Car comparison

Ford Puma · Facelift 2024 ST 1.0 EcoBoostvsGeely Coolray · Facelift 2023 1.5T

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Ford Puma · Facelift 2024

ST 1.0 EcoBoost

170 hp999 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2024-present
VS

Geely Coolray · Facelift 2023

1.5T

181 hp1499 ccGasolineFWDDual-clutchTurbochargedSUV2024-present

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Geely Coolray Facelift 2023 1.5T

  • Most powerful
    181 hp
    135 kW
  • Highest torque
    290 Nm
    214 lb-ft
  • Best power-to-weight
    134 hp/t
    100 kW/t
    7.5 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    6.4 L/100 km
    37.0 mpg US
    44.5 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    709 km
    440 mi
  • Best overall score
    61/100
  • Best performance score
    48/100
  • Best economy score
    90/100
  • Best practicality score
    88/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelFordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoostGeelyCoolrayFacelift 20231.5T
Power
170hp127kW
181hp135kW
Torque
248Nm183lb-ft
290Nm214lb-ft
Curb weight
1,315kg2,899lb
1,350kg2,976lb
Gross weight
1,850kg4,079lb
1,725kg3,803lb
Top speed
210 km/h
130 mph
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
72.8s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph
Calculated
70.2s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.4s
7.6s
0-200 km/h
45.0s
Calculated
44.0s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.0s
Calculated
7.2s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK
6.4L/100 km37mpg US44.5mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.4s
Calculated
15.5s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
129hp/t96kW/t59hp/1000 lb
Calculated
134hp/t100kW/t61hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
189Nm/t126lb-ft/ton
Calculated
215Nm/t144lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
646km402mi
Calculated
709km440mi
Calculated
Displacement
999cc61cu in
1,499cc91cu in
Length
4,226mm166in
4,380mm172in
Width-
1,800mm71in
Height
1,533mm60in
1,609mm63in
Wheelbase
2,588mm102in
2,600mm102in
Front track
1,567mm62in
1,546mm61in
Rear track
1,523mm60in
1,557mm61in
Ground clearance
152mm6in
-
Trunk volume
456L
-
Max trunk volume
1,216L
-
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
42L
45L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Ford Puma Facelift 2024 ST 1.0 EcoBoostGeely Coolray Facelift 2023 1.5TPowerTorque
  • Ford Puma Facelift 2024 ST 1.0 EcoBoost: Power / Torque
  • Geely Coolray Facelift 2023 1.5T: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost5,750 rpm3,000 rpm6,000 rpm
GeelyCoolrayFacelift 20231.5T5,500 rpm2,000-3,500 rpm5,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricFordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoostGeelyCoolrayFacelift 20231.5T
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.0 s
7.2 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.4 s
7.6 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
45.0 s
44.0 s
Top speed
210 km/h
130 mph
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.6 s
330 ft
101 m
6.6 s
6.7 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.0 s
10.1 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.9 s
13.1 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.4 s
15.5 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
148 km/h
92 mph
148 km/h
92 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost
170 hp
127 kW
GeelyCoolrayFacelift 20231.5T
181 hp
135 kW

Geely Coolray Facelift 2023 1.5T has 11 hp more than Ford Puma Facelift 2024 ST 1.0 EcoBoost.

The biggest power difference is between Ford Puma Facelift 2024 ST 1.0 EcoBoost and Geely Coolray Facelift 2023 1.5T: 11 hp (8 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost
248 Nm
183 lb-ft
GeelyCoolrayFacelift 20231.5T
290 Nm
214 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost
1,315 kg
2,899 lb
GeelyCoolrayFacelift 20231.5T
1,350 kg
2,976 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost
210 km/h
130 mph
GeelyCoolrayFacelift 20231.5T
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost7.4 s
GeelyCoolrayFacelift 20231.5T7.6 s

Although Geely Coolray Facelift 2023 1.5T has more power, Ford Puma Facelift 2024 ST 1.0 EcoBoost is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Ford Puma Facelift 2024 ST 1.0 EcoBoost and Geely Coolray Facelift 2023 1.5T: 0.2 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost
6.5 L/100 km
36.2 mpg US
43.5 mpg UK
GeelyCoolrayFacelift 20231.5T
6.4 L/100 km
37.0 mpg US
44.5 mpg UK

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost
129 hp/t
96 kW/t
7.7 kg/hp
GeelyCoolrayFacelift 20231.5T
134 hp/t
100 kW/t
7.5 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost
646 km
402 mi
GeelyCoolrayFacelift 20231.5T
709 km
440 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost
170 hp
127 kW
7.4 s
210 km/h
130 mph
GeelyCoolrayFacelift 20231.5T
181 hp
135 kW
7.6 s
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost
Power
170 hp
127 kW
0-100 km/h7.4 s
Top speed
210 km/h
130 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
456 L
16.1 cu ft
Length
4,226 mm
166.4 in
Height
1,533 mm
60.4 in
GeelyCoolrayFacelift 20231.5T
Power
181 hp
135 kW
0-100 km/h7.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,380 mm
172.4 in
Height
1,609 mm
63.3 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost
Power
170 hp
127 kW
0-100 km/h7.4 s
Top speed
210 km/h
130 mph
6.5 L/100 km
36.2 mpg US
43.5 mpg UK
GeelyCoolrayFacelift 20231.5T
Power
181 hp
135 kW
0-100 km/h7.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
6.4 L/100 km
37.0 mpg US
44.5 mpg UK

Geely Coolray Facelift 2023 1.5T is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost
6.5 L/100 km
36.2 mpg US
43.5 mpg UK
7.4 s
GeelyCoolrayFacelift 20231.5T
6.4 L/100 km
37.0 mpg US
44.5 mpg UK
7.6 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost
129 hp/t
96 kW/t
7.7 kg/hp
6.5 L/100 km
36.2 mpg US
43.5 mpg UK
GeelyCoolrayFacelift 20231.5T
134 hp/t
100 kW/t
7.5 kg/hp
6.4 L/100 km
37.0 mpg US
44.5 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleFordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoostGeelyCoolrayFacelift 20231.5T
Power
170 hp
127 kW
181 hp
135 kW
Torque
248 Nm
183 lb-ft
290 Nm
214 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.4 s
7.6 s
Top speed
210 km/h
130 mph
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Lightness
1,315 kg
2,899 lb
1,350 kg
2,976 lb
Fuel consumption
6.5 L/100 km
36.2 mpg US
43.5 mpg UK
6.4 L/100 km
37.0 mpg US
44.5 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
456 L
16.1 cu ft
Length
4,226 mm
166.4 in
Height
1,533 mm
60.4 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,380 mm
172.4 in
Height
1,609 mm
63.3 in
Range score
646 km
402 mi
709 km
440 mi
Trunk score
456 L
16.1 cu ft
-
Power-to-weight score
129 hp/t
96 kW/t
7.7 kg/hp
134 hp/t
100 kW/t
7.5 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleFord Puma Facelift 2024 ST 1.0 EcoBoostGeely Coolray Facelift 2023 1.5T
Consumption6.5 L/100 km36.2 mpg US43.5 mpg UK6.4 L/100 km37 mpg US44.5 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km11.38 LC100 km11.11 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi18.31 LC100 mi17.88 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used975 L258 US gal214 UK gal953 L252 US gal210 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,706 LC/year1,667 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Ford Puma Facelift 2024 ST 1.0 EcoBoost

  • Is 35 kg lighter
  • Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Lightest

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption

Geely Coolray Facelift 2023 1.5T

  • Has 11 hp more
  • Has 42 Nm more
  • Uses 0.2 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 5 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 63 km (39 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Heaviest

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Ford Puma ST 1.0 EcoBoost
Geely Coolray 1.5T
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

ST 1.0 EcoBoost
1.0 EcoBoost
VS
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoostvsFordPuma1.0 EcoBoost
1.5T
GLB 220
VS
GeelyCoolrayFacelift 20231.5TvsMercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 220
ST 1.0 EcoBoost
1.5 TSI
VS
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoostvsCupraTerramar1.5 TSI
ST 1.0 EcoBoost
1.5 TSI
VS
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoostvsVolkswagenTayron II1.5 TSI
ST 1.0 EcoBoost
1.6 T-GDI
VS
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoostvsHyundaiKona II1.6 T-GDI
ST 1.0 EcoBoost
1.5 TSI
VS
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoostvsVolkswagenTiguan III1.5 TSI
1.5T
40 TDI
VS
GeelyCoolrayFacelift 20231.5TvsAUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TDI
ST 1.0 EcoBoost
GLA 250e
VS
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoostvsMercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 250e
1.5T
2.0 TSI
VS
GeelyCoolrayFacelift 20231.5TvsVolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TSI
ST 1.0 EcoBoost
2.0 TSI
VS
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoostvsCupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI
1.5T
1.5T
VS
GeelyCoolrayFacelift 20231.5TvsChevroletSeeker1.5T
ST 1.0 EcoBoost
1.3 Turbo
VS
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoostvsMitsubishiASX II1.3 Turbo
Ford Puma · Facelift 2024 ST 1.0 EcoBoost vs Geely Coolray · Facelift 2023 1.5T - car comparison - FastVsFaster