Car comparison

Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoostvsSkoda Kodiaq I 2.0 TDI

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Ford Puma

1.0 EcoBoost

155 hpGasolineFWDManualTurbochargedSUV2019-2020
VS

Skoda Kodiaq I

2.0 TDI

177 hp1968 ccDieselAWDDual-clutchTurbochargedSUV2018-2021

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Skoda Kodiaq I 2.0 TDI

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    8.8 s
  • Most powerful
    177 hp
    132 kW
  • Highest torque
    380 Nm
    280 lb-ft
  • Best overall score
    58/100
  • Best performance score
    44/100
  • Best practicality score
    89/100

Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost

  • Fastest top speed
    210 km/h
    130 mph Unrestricted
    200 km/h
    124 mph Restricted
  • Lightest
    1,205 kg
    2,657 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    129 hp/t
    96 kW/t
    7.8 kg/hp
  • Best economy score
    95/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelFordPuma1.0 EcoBoostSkodaKodiaq I2.0 TDI
Power
155hp116kW
177hp132kW
Torque
240Nm177lb-ft
380Nm280lb-ft
Curb weight
1,205kg2,657lb
1,750kg3,858lb
Gross weight
1,765kg3,891lb
-
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Calculated
203 km/h
126 mph
To 99% top speed
82.4s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph
Calculated
90.8s99% target: 201 km/h / 125 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
9.0s
8.8s
0-200 km/h
51.7s
Calculated
81.5s
Calculated
0-60 mph
8.5s
Calculated
8.3s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
4.5L/100 km52.3mpg US62.8mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption city
5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption highway
4.1L/100 km57.4mpg US68.9mpg UK
-
Quarter mile
16.5s
Calculated
16.4s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
129hp/t96kW/t58hp/1000 lb
Calculated
101hp/t75kW/t46hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
199Nm/t133lb-ft/ton
Calculated
217Nm/t145lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
933km580mi
Calculated
-
Displacement-
1,968cc120cu in
Length
4,207mm166in
4,697mm185in
Width
1,805mm71in
1,882mm74in
Height
1,538mm61in
1,659mm65in
Wheelbase
2,588mm102in
2,791mm110in
Front track-
1,586mm62in
Rear track-
1,576mm62in
Ground clearance-
192mm8in
Trunk volume
468L
-
Max trunk volume
1,161L
-
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
7
Fuel tank
42L
60L
CO2 emissions
101g/km
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoostSkoda Kodiaq I 2.0 TDIPowerTorque
  • Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost: Power / Torque
  • Skoda Kodiaq I 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoost6,000 rpm1,750 rpm6,250 rpm
SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TDI3,500-4,000 rpm1,750-3,000 rpm4,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricFordPuma1.0 EcoBoostSkodaKodiaq I2.0 TDI
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
8.5 s
8.3 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
9.0 s
8.8 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
51.7 s
81.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Likely limited
203 km/h
126 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.8 s
2.6 s
330 ft
101 m
7.3 s
7.0 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.9 s
10.6 s
1000 ft
305 m
14.0 s
13.7 s
1/4 mile
402 m
16.5 s
16.4 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
141 km/h
87 mph
137 km/h
85 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoost
155 hp
116 kW
SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TDI
177 hp
132 kW

Skoda Kodiaq I 2.0 TDI has 22 hp more than Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost.

The biggest power difference is between Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost and Skoda Kodiaq I 2.0 TDI: 22 hp (16 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoost
240 Nm
177 lb-ft
SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TDI
380 Nm
280 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoost
1,205 kg
2,657 lb
SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TDI
1,750 kg
3,858 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoost
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TDI
203 km/h
126 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoost9.0 s
SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TDI8.8 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Skoda Kodiaq I 2.0 TDI and Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost: 0.2 s.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoost
129 hp/t
96 kW/t
7.8 kg/hp
SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TDI
101 hp/t
75 kW/t
9.9 kg/hp

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoost
155 hp
116 kW
9.0 s
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TDI
177 hp
132 kW
8.8 s
203 km/h
126 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoost
Power
155 hp
116 kW
0-100 km/h9.0 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
468 L
16.5 cu ft
Length
4,207 mm
165.6 in
Height
1,538 mm
60.6 in
SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TDI
Power
177 hp
132 kW
0-100 km/h8.8 s
Top speed
203 km/h
126 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
7 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,697 mm
184.9 in
Height
1,659 mm
65.3 in

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleFordPuma1.0 EcoBoostSkodaKodiaq I2.0 TDI
Power
155 hp
116 kW
177 hp
132 kW
Torque
240 Nm
177 lb-ft
380 Nm
280 lb-ft
Acceleration
9.0 s
8.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
203 km/h
126 mph
Lightness
1,205 kg
2,657 lb
1,750 kg
3,858 lb
Fuel consumption
4.5 L/100 km
52.3 mpg US
62.8 mpg UK
-
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
468 L
16.5 cu ft
Length
4,207 mm
165.6 in
Height
1,538 mm
60.6 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
7 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,697 mm
184.9 in
Height
1,659 mm
65.3 in
Range score
933 km
580 mi
-
CO2 score
101 g/km
-
Trunk score
468 L
16.5 cu ft
-
Power-to-weight score
129 hp/t
96 kW/t
7.8 kg/hp
101 hp/t
75 kW/t
9.9 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleFord Puma 1.0 EcoBoost
Consumption4.5 L/100 km52.3 mpg US62.8 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km7.88 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi12.67 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used675 L178 US gal148 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,181 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost

  • Is 545 kg lighter
  • Has 7 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 27 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power

Skoda Kodiaq I 2.0 TDI

  • Has 22 hp more
  • Has 140 Nm more
  • Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque

Cons

  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost
Skoda Kodiaq I 2.0 TDI
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

1.0 EcoBoost
1.0 EcoBoost
VS
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoostvsFordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost
2.0 TDI
20d
VS
SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TDIvsJaguarF-Pace20d
1.0 EcoBoost
1.5 TSI
VS
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoostvsVolkswagenT-Cross1.5 TSI
2.0 TDI
2.0 D4
VS
SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TDIvsVolvoXC60 II2.0 D4
1.0 EcoBoost
35 TFSI
VS
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoostvsAUDIQ2L35 TFSI
2.0 TDI
2.0 Skyactiv-X
VS
SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TDIvsMazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X
2.0 TDI
330TSI
VS
SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TDIvsVolkswagenTayron I330TSI
1.0 EcoBoost
Cooper D 2.0
VS
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoostvsMiniCountryman (F60)Cooper D 2.0
2.0 TDI
2.0 TSI
VS
SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TDIvsSeatTarraco2.0 TSI
1.0 EcoBoost
1.2 PureTech
VS
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoostvsPeugeot2008 II1.2 PureTech
2.0 TDI
2.0 T4
VS
SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TDIvsVolvoXC402.0 T4
1.0 EcoBoost
35 TFSI
VS
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoostvsAUDIQ235 TFSI
Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost vs Skoda Kodiaq I 2.0 TDI - car comparison - FastVsFaster