Car comparison

Mazda CX-30 2.0 Skyactiv-XvsSkoda Kodiaq I 2.0 TDI

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Mazda CX-30

2.0 Skyactiv-X

180 hp1998 ccGasolineAWDManualNaturally aspiratedSUV2019-2021
VS

Skoda Kodiaq I

2.0 TDI

177 hp1968 ccDieselAWDDual-clutchTurbochargedSUV2018-2021

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Skoda Kodiaq I 2.0 TDI

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    8.8 s
  • Highest torque
    380 Nm
    280 lb-ft
  • Best overall score
    58/100
  • Best performance score
    44/100
  • Best practicality score
    89/100

Mazda CX-30 2.0 Skyactiv-X

  • Fastest top speed
    204 km/h
    127 mph
  • Most powerful
    180 hp
    134 kW
  • Lightest
    1,538 kg
    3,391 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    117 hp/t
    87 kW/t
    8.5 kg/hp
  • Best economy score
    94/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelMazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-XSkodaKodiaq I2.0 TDI
Power
180hp134kW
177hp132kW
Torque
224Nm165lb-ft
380Nm280lb-ft
Curb weight
1,538kg3,391lb
1,750kg3,858lb
Gross weight
2,042kg4,502lb
-
Top speed
204 km/h
127 mph
203 km/h
126 mph
To 99% top speed
81.1s99% target: 202 km/h / 125 mph
Calculated
90.8s99% target: 201 km/h / 125 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
8.9s
8.8s
0-200 km/h
67.6s
Calculated
81.5s
Calculated
0-60 mph
8.4s
Calculated
8.3s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption city
5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption highway
4.5L/100 km52.3mpg US62.8mpg UK
-
Quarter mile
16.5s
Calculated
16.4s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
117hp/t87kW/t53hp/1000 lb
Calculated
101hp/t75kW/t46hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
146Nm/t97lb-ft/ton
Calculated
217Nm/t145lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
980km609mi
Calculated
-
Displacement
1,998cc122cu in
1,968cc120cu in
Length
4,395mm173in
4,697mm185in
Width
1,795mm71in
1,882mm74in
Height
1,540mm61in
1,659mm65in
Wheelbase
2,655mm105in
2,791mm110in
Front track
1,565mm62in
1,586mm62in
Rear track
1,565mm62in
1,576mm62in
Ground clearance
175mm7in
192mm8in
Trunk volume
430L
-
Max trunk volume
1,406L
-
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
7
Fuel tank
48L
60L
CO2 emissions
111g/km
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Mazda CX-30 2.0 Skyactiv-XSkoda Kodiaq I 2.0 TDIPowerTorque
  • Mazda CX-30 2.0 Skyactiv-X: Power / Torque
  • Skoda Kodiaq I 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X6,000 rpm3,000 rpm6,250 rpm
SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TDI3,500-4,000 rpm1,750-3,000 rpm4,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricMazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-XSkodaKodiaq I2.0 TDI
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
8.4 s
8.3 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
8.9 s
8.8 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
67.6 s
81.5 s
Top speed
204 km/h
127 mph
203 km/h
126 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.7 s
2.6 s
330 ft
101 m
7.2 s
7.0 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.8 s
10.6 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.9 s
13.7 s
1/4 mile
402 m
16.5 s
16.4 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
140 km/h
87 mph
137 km/h
85 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X
180 hp
134 kW
SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TDI
177 hp
132 kW

Mazda CX-30 2.0 Skyactiv-X has 3 hp more than Skoda Kodiaq I 2.0 TDI.

The biggest power difference is between Skoda Kodiaq I 2.0 TDI and Mazda CX-30 2.0 Skyactiv-X: 3 hp (2 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X
224 Nm
165 lb-ft
SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TDI
380 Nm
280 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X
1,538 kg
3,391 lb
SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TDI
1,750 kg
3,858 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X
204 km/h
127 mph
SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TDI
203 km/h
126 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X8.9 s
SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TDI8.8 s

Although Mazda CX-30 2.0 Skyactiv-X has more power, Skoda Kodiaq I 2.0 TDI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Skoda Kodiaq I 2.0 TDI and Mazda CX-30 2.0 Skyactiv-X: 0.1 s.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X
117 hp/t
87 kW/t
8.5 kg/hp
SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TDI
101 hp/t
75 kW/t
9.9 kg/hp

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X
180 hp
134 kW
8.9 s
204 km/h
127 mph
SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TDI
177 hp
132 kW
8.8 s
203 km/h
126 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X
Power
180 hp
134 kW
0-100 km/h8.9 s
Top speed
204 km/h
127 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
430 L
15.2 cu ft
Length
4,395 mm
173.0 in
Height
1,540 mm
60.6 in
SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TDI
Power
177 hp
132 kW
0-100 km/h8.8 s
Top speed
203 km/h
126 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
7 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,697 mm
184.9 in
Height
1,659 mm
65.3 in

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleMazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-XSkodaKodiaq I2.0 TDI
Power
180 hp
134 kW
177 hp
132 kW
Torque
224 Nm
165 lb-ft
380 Nm
280 lb-ft
Acceleration
8.9 s
8.8 s
Top speed
204 km/h
127 mph
203 km/h
126 mph
Lightness
1,538 kg
3,391 lb
1,750 kg
3,858 lb
Fuel consumption
4.9 L/100 km
48.0 mpg US
57.6 mpg UK
-
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
430 L
15.2 cu ft
Length
4,395 mm
173.0 in
Height
1,540 mm
60.6 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
7 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,697 mm
184.9 in
Height
1,659 mm
65.3 in
Range score
980 km
609 mi
-
CO2 score
111 g/km
-
Trunk score
430 L
15.2 cu ft
-
Power-to-weight score
117 hp/t
87 kW/t
8.5 kg/hp
101 hp/t
75 kW/t
9.9 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleMazda CX-30 2.0 Skyactiv-X
Consumption4.9 L/100 km48 mpg US57.6 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km8.58 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi13.80 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used735 L194 US gal162 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,286 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Mazda CX-30 2.0 Skyactiv-X

  • Has 3 hp more
  • Is 212 kg lighter
  • Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 16 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h

Skoda Kodiaq I 2.0 TDI

  • Has 156 Nm more
  • Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest torque

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Mazda CX-30 2.0 Skyactiv-X
Skoda Kodiaq I 2.0 TDI
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Mazda CX-30 2.0 Skyactiv-X vs Skoda Kodiaq I 2.0 TDI - car comparison - FastVsFaster