Mazda CX-30
Car comparison
Mazda CX-30 2.0 Skyactiv-XvsSkoda Kodiaq I 2.0 TDI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonSkoda Kodiaq I
2.0 TDI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Skoda Kodiaq I 2.0 TDI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.8 s
- Highest torque380 Nm280 lb-ft
- Best overall score58/100
- Best performance score44/100
- Best practicality score89/100
Mazda CX-30 2.0 Skyactiv-X
- Fastest top speed204 km/h127 mph
- Most powerful180 hp134 kW
- Lightest1,538 kg3,391 lb
- Best power-to-weight117 hp/t87 kW/t8.5 kg/hp
- Best economy score94/100
Specification comparison
| Model | MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X | SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 180hp134kW | 177hp132kW |
| Torque | 224Nm165lb-ft | 380Nm280lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,538kg3,391lb | 1,750kg3,858lb |
| Gross weight | 2,042kg4,502lb | - |
| Top speed | 204 km/h 127 mph | 203 km/h 126 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 81.1s99% target: 202 km/h / 125 mph Calculated | 90.8s99% target: 201 km/h / 125 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.9s | 8.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 67.6s Calculated | 81.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.4s Calculated | 8.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.5L/100 km52.3mpg US62.8mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 16.5s Calculated | 16.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 117hp/t87kW/t53hp/1000 lb Calculated | 101hp/t75kW/t46hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 146Nm/t97lb-ft/ton Calculated | 217Nm/t145lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 980km609mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 1,998cc122cu in | 1,968cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,395mm173in | 4,697mm185in |
| Width | 1,795mm71in | 1,882mm74in |
| Height | 1,540mm61in | 1,659mm65in |
| Wheelbase | 2,655mm105in | 2,791mm110in |
| Front track | 1,565mm62in | 1,586mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,565mm62in | 1,576mm62in |
| Ground clearance | 175mm7in | 192mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 430L | - |
| Max trunk volume | 1,406L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 7 |
| Fuel tank | 48L | 60L |
| CO2 emissions | 111g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mazda CX-30 2.0 Skyactiv-X: Power / Torque
- Skoda Kodiaq I 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X | 6,000 rpm | 3,000 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TDI | 3,500-4,000 rpm | 1,750-3,000 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X | SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.4 s | 8.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.9 s | 8.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 67.6 s | 81.5 s |
| Top speed | 204 km/h 127 mph | 203 km/h 126 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.2 s | 7.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.8 s | 10.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.9 s | 13.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.5 s | 16.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 140 km/h 87 mph | 137 km/h 85 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X | 180 hp 134 kW |
| SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TDI | 177 hp 132 kW |
Mazda CX-30 2.0 Skyactiv-X has 3 hp more than Skoda Kodiaq I 2.0 TDI.
The biggest power difference is between Skoda Kodiaq I 2.0 TDI and Mazda CX-30 2.0 Skyactiv-X: 3 hp (2 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X | 224 Nm 165 lb-ft |
| SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TDI | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X | 1,538 kg 3,391 lb |
| SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TDI | 1,750 kg 3,858 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X | 204 km/h 127 mph |
| SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TDI | 203 km/h 126 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X | 8.9 s |
| SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TDI | 8.8 s |
Although Mazda CX-30 2.0 Skyactiv-X has more power, Skoda Kodiaq I 2.0 TDI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Skoda Kodiaq I 2.0 TDI and Mazda CX-30 2.0 Skyactiv-X: 0.1 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X | 117 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp |
| SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TDI | 101 hp/t 75 kW/t 9.9 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X | 180 hp 134 kW | 8.9 s | 204 km/h 127 mph |
| SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TDI | 177 hp 132 kW | 8.8 s | 203 km/h 126 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X | SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TDI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 180 hp 134 kW | 177 hp 132 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 224 Nm 165 lb-ft | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.9 s | 8.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 204 km/h 127 mph | 203 km/h 126 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,538 kg 3,391 lb | 1,750 kg 3,858 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 980 km 609 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 111 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 430 L 15.2 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 117 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp | 101 hp/t 75 kW/t 9.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mazda CX-30 2.0 Skyactiv-X |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 4.9 L/100 km48 mpg US57.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 8.58 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 13.80 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 735 L194 US gal162 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,286 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mazda CX-30 2.0 Skyactiv-X
- Has 3 hp more
- Is 212 kg lighter
- Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Has 16 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
Skoda Kodiaq I 2.0 TDI
- Has 156 Nm more
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest torque
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























