Car comparison

Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoostvsSkoda Karoq 1.5 TSI

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Ford Puma

1.0 EcoBoost

155 hpGasolineFWDManualTurbochargedSUV2019-2020
VS

Skoda Karoq

1.5 TSI

150 hp1498 ccGasolineFWDManualTurbochargedSUV2017-2021

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost

  • Fastest top speed
    210 km/h
    130 mph Unrestricted
    200 km/h
    124 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    155 hp
    116 kW
  • Lightest
    1,205 kg
    2,657 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    129 hp/t
    96 kW/t
    7.8 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    4.5 L/100 km
    52.3 mpg US
    62.8 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    5.1 L/100 km
    46.1 mpg US
    55.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    4.1 L/100 km
    57.4 mpg US
    68.9 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    101 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    933 km
    580 mi
  • Best overall score
    55/100
  • Best performance score
    42/100
  • Best economy score
    95/100

Skoda Karoq 1.5 TSI

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    8.4 s
  • Highest torque
    250 Nm
    184 lb-ft
  • Largest trunk
    521 L
  • Best practicality score
    84/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelFordPuma1.0 EcoBoostSkodaKaroq1.5 TSI
Power
155hp116kW
150hp112kW
Torque
240Nm177lb-ft
250Nm184lb-ft
Curb weight
1,205kg2,657lb
1,303kg2,873lb
Gross weight
1,765kg3,891lb
1,915kg4,222lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Calculated
204 km/h
127 mph
To 99% top speed
82.3s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph
Calculated
79.8s99% target: 202 km/h / 125 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
9.0s
8.4s
0-200 km/h
51.6s
Calculated
66.4s
Calculated
0-60 mph
8.5s
Calculated
7.9s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
4.5L/100 km52.3mpg US62.8mpg UK
5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK
6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
4.1L/100 km57.4mpg US68.9mpg UK
4.7L/100 km50mpg US60.1mpg UK
Quarter mile
16.5s
Calculated
16.1s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
129hp/t96kW/t58hp/1000 lb
Calculated
115hp/t86kW/t52hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
199Nm/t133lb-ft/ton
Calculated
192Nm/t128lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
933km580mi
Calculated
926km575mi
Calculated
Displacement-
1,498cc91cu in
Length
4,207mm166in
4,382mm173in
Width
1,805mm71in
1,841mm72in
Height
1,538mm61in
1,603mm63in
Wheelbase
2,588mm102in
2,638mm104in
Front track-
1,576mm62in
Rear track-
1,541mm61in
Trunk volume
468L
521L
Max trunk volume
1,161L
1,630L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
42L
50L
CO2 emissions
101g/km
123g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoostSkoda Karoq 1.5 TSIPowerTorque
  • Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost: Power / Torque
  • Skoda Karoq 1.5 TSI: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoost6,000 rpm1,750 rpm6,250 rpm
SkodaKaroq1.5 TSI5,000-6,000 rpm1,500-3,500 rpm6,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricFordPuma1.0 EcoBoostSkodaKaroq1.5 TSI
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
8.5 s
7.9 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
9.0 s
8.4 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
51.6 s
66.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Likely limited
204 km/h
127 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.8 s
2.6 s
330 ft
101 m
7.3 s
6.9 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.9 s
10.5 s
1000 ft
305 m
14.0 s
13.5 s
1/4 mile
402 m
16.5 s
16.1 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
141 km/h
87 mph
141 km/h
88 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoost
155 hp
116 kW
SkodaKaroq1.5 TSI
150 hp
112 kW

Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost has 5 hp more than Skoda Karoq 1.5 TSI.

The biggest power difference is between Skoda Karoq 1.5 TSI and Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost: 5 hp (4 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoost
240 Nm
177 lb-ft
SkodaKaroq1.5 TSI
250 Nm
184 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoost
1,205 kg
2,657 lb
SkodaKaroq1.5 TSI
1,303 kg
2,873 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoost
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
SkodaKaroq1.5 TSI
204 km/h
127 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoost9.0 s
SkodaKaroq1.5 TSI8.4 s

Although Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost has more power, Skoda Karoq 1.5 TSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Skoda Karoq 1.5 TSI and Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost: 0.6 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoost
4.5 L/100 km
52.3 mpg US
62.8 mpg UK
SkodaKaroq1.5 TSI
5.4 L/100 km
43.6 mpg US
52.3 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost and Skoda Karoq 1.5 TSI: 0.9 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoost
129 hp/t
96 kW/t
7.8 kg/hp
SkodaKaroq1.5 TSI
115 hp/t
86 kW/t
8.7 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoost
933 km
580 mi
SkodaKaroq1.5 TSI
926 km
575 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoost
155 hp
116 kW
9.0 s
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
SkodaKaroq1.5 TSI
150 hp
112 kW
8.4 s
204 km/h
127 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoost
Power
155 hp
116 kW
0-100 km/h9.0 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
468 L
16.5 cu ft
Length
4,207 mm
165.6 in
Height
1,538 mm
60.6 in
SkodaKaroq1.5 TSI
Power
150 hp
112 kW
0-100 km/h8.4 s
Top speed
204 km/h
127 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
521 L
18.4 cu ft
Length
4,382 mm
172.5 in
Height
1,603 mm
63.1 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoost
Power
155 hp
116 kW
0-100 km/h9.0 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
4.5 L/100 km
52.3 mpg US
62.8 mpg UK
SkodaKaroq1.5 TSI
Power
150 hp
112 kW
0-100 km/h8.4 s
Top speed
204 km/h
127 mph
5.4 L/100 km
43.6 mpg US
52.3 mpg UK

Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoost
4.5 L/100 km
52.3 mpg US
62.8 mpg UK
9.0 s
SkodaKaroq1.5 TSI
5.4 L/100 km
43.6 mpg US
52.3 mpg UK
8.4 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoost
129 hp/t
96 kW/t
7.8 kg/hp
4.5 L/100 km
52.3 mpg US
62.8 mpg UK
SkodaKaroq1.5 TSI
115 hp/t
86 kW/t
8.7 kg/hp
5.4 L/100 km
43.6 mpg US
52.3 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleFordPuma1.0 EcoBoostSkodaKaroq1.5 TSI
Power
155 hp
116 kW
150 hp
112 kW
Torque
240 Nm
177 lb-ft
250 Nm
184 lb-ft
Acceleration
9.0 s
8.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
204 km/h
127 mph
Lightness
1,205 kg
2,657 lb
1,303 kg
2,873 lb
Fuel consumption
4.5 L/100 km
52.3 mpg US
62.8 mpg UK
5.4 L/100 km
43.6 mpg US
52.3 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
468 L
16.5 cu ft
Length
4,207 mm
165.6 in
Height
1,538 mm
60.6 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
521 L
18.4 cu ft
Length
4,382 mm
172.5 in
Height
1,603 mm
63.1 in
Range score
933 km
580 mi
926 km
575 mi
CO2 score
101 g/km
123 g/km
Trunk score
468 L
16.5 cu ft
521 L
18.4 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
129 hp/t
96 kW/t
7.8 kg/hp
115 hp/t
86 kW/t
8.7 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleFord Puma 1.0 EcoBoostSkoda Karoq 1.5 TSI
Consumption4.5 L/100 km52.3 mpg US62.8 mpg UK5.4 L/100 km43.6 mpg US52.3 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km7.88 LC100 km9.45 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi12.67 LC100 mi15.21 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used675 L178 US gal148 UK gal810 L214 US gal178 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,181 LC/year1,418 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost

  • Has 5 hp more
  • Is 98 kg lighter
  • Has 6 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 0.9 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 14 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 7 km (5 mi) more estimated range
  • Emits 22 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Smallest trunk

Skoda Karoq 1.5 TSI

  • Has 10 Nm more
  • Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 53 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest torque
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost
Skoda Karoq 1.5 TSI
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

1.0 EcoBoost
1.0 EcoBoost
VS
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoostvsFordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost
1.5 TSI
35 TFSI
VS
SkodaKaroq1.5 TSIvsAUDIQ235 TFSI
1.0 EcoBoost
1.5 TSI
VS
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoostvsVolkswagenT-Cross1.5 TSI
1.5 TSI
280TSI
VS
SkodaKaroq1.5 TSIvsVolkswagenTacqua280TSI
1.0 EcoBoost
35 TFSI
VS
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoostvsAUDIQ2L35 TFSI
1.5 TSI
1.5 TSI
VS
SkodaKaroq1.5 TSIvsVolkswagenT-Roc I1.5 TSI
1.0 EcoBoost
2.0 e-Skyactiv G
VS
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoostvsMazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G
1.0 EcoBoost
Cooper D 2.0
VS
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoostvsMiniCountryman (F60)Cooper D 2.0
1.0 EcoBoost
1.2 PureTech
VS
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoostvsPeugeot2008 II1.2 PureTech
1.5 TSI
2.0 SKYACTIV-G
VS
SkodaKaroq1.5 TSIvsMazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-G
1.5 TSI
35 TFSI
VS
SkodaKaroq1.5 TSIvsAUDIQ2Facelift 202035 TFSI
1.5 TSI
GLA 200
VS
SkodaKaroq1.5 TSIvsMercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 200
Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost vs Skoda Karoq 1.5 TSI - car comparison - FastVsFaster