Car comparison

Ford Puma · Facelift 2024 1.0 EcoBoostvsVolkswagen Tiguan III 1.4 TSI

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Ford Puma · Facelift 2024

1.0 EcoBoost

155 hp999 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2024-present
VS

Volkswagen Tiguan III

1.4 TSI

150 hp1395 ccGasolineFWDDual-clutchTurbochargedSUV2024-present

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Ford Puma Facelift 2024 1.0 EcoBoost

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    8.7 s
  • Fastest top speed
    210 km/h
    130 mph Unrestricted
    200 km/h
    124 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    155 hp
    116 kW
  • Lightest
    1,293 kg
    2,851 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    120 hp/t
    89 kW/t
    8.3 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    6.3 L/100 km
    37.3 mpg US
    44.8 mpg UK
  • Best performance score
    43/100
  • Best economy score
    90/100

Volkswagen Tiguan III 1.4 TSI

  • Highest torque
    250 Nm
    184 lb-ft
  • Best estimated range
    724 km
    450 mi
  • Largest trunk
    652 L
  • Best overall score
    56/100
  • Best practicality score
    90/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelFordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoostVolkswagenTiguan III1.4 TSI
Power
155hp116kW
150hp112kW
Torque
240Nm177lb-ft
250Nm184lb-ft
Curb weight
1,293kg2,851lb
1,605kg3,538lb
Gross weight
1,835kg4,045lb
2,140kg4,718lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Calculated
207 km/h
129 mph
To 99% top speed
80.9s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph
Calculated
89.1s99% target: 205 km/h / 127 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
8.7s
9.2s
0-200 km/h
50.6s
Calculated
62.2s
Calculated
0-60 mph
8.2s
Calculated
8.7s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK
7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption city-
9.8L/100 km24mpg US28.8mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway-
6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK
Quarter mile
16.3s
Calculated
16.7s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
120hp/t89kW/t54hp/1000 lb
Calculated
93hp/t70kW/t42hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
186Nm/t124lb-ft/ton
Calculated
156Nm/t104lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
667km414mi
Calculated
724km450mi
Calculated
Displacement
999cc61cu in
1,395cc85cu in
Length
4,186mm165in
4,539mm179in
Width
1,805mm71in
1,842mm73in
Height
1,550mm61in
1,658mm65in
Wheelbase
2,588mm102in
2,676mm105in
Front track
1,567mm62in
1,590mm63in
Rear track
1,526mm60in
1,582mm62in
Ground clearance
163mm6in
191mm8in
Trunk volume
456L
652L
Max trunk volume
1,216L
1,650L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
42L
55L
CO2 emissions-
173g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Ford Puma Facelift 2024 1.0 EcoBoostVolkswagen Tiguan III 1.4 TSIPowerTorque
  • Ford Puma Facelift 2024 1.0 EcoBoost: Power / Torque
  • Volkswagen Tiguan III 1.4 TSI: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost6,000 rpm2,500 rpm6,250 rpm
VolkswagenTiguan III1.4 TSI5,000-6,000 rpm1,500-3,500 rpm6,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricFordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoostVolkswagenTiguan III1.4 TSI
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
8.2 s
8.7 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
8.7 s
9.2 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
50.6 s
62.2 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Likely limited
207 km/h
129 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.7 s
2.7 s
330 ft
101 m
7.1 s
7.2 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.7 s
10.9 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.8 s
14.0 s
1/4 mile
402 m
16.3 s
16.7 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
142 km/h
88 mph
138 km/h
86 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost
155 hp
116 kW
VolkswagenTiguan III1.4 TSI
150 hp
112 kW

Ford Puma Facelift 2024 1.0 EcoBoost has 5 hp more than Volkswagen Tiguan III 1.4 TSI.

The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen Tiguan III 1.4 TSI and Ford Puma Facelift 2024 1.0 EcoBoost: 5 hp (4 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost
240 Nm
177 lb-ft
VolkswagenTiguan III1.4 TSI
250 Nm
184 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost
1,293 kg
2,851 lb
VolkswagenTiguan III1.4 TSI
1,605 kg
3,538 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
VolkswagenTiguan III1.4 TSI
207 km/h
129 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost8.7 s
VolkswagenTiguan III1.4 TSI9.2 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Ford Puma Facelift 2024 1.0 EcoBoost and Volkswagen Tiguan III 1.4 TSI: 0.5 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost
6.3 L/100 km
37.3 mpg US
44.8 mpg UK
VolkswagenTiguan III1.4 TSI
7.6 L/100 km
30.9 mpg US
37.2 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Ford Puma Facelift 2024 1.0 EcoBoost and Volkswagen Tiguan III 1.4 TSI: 1.3 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost
120 hp/t
89 kW/t
8.3 kg/hp
VolkswagenTiguan III1.4 TSI
93 hp/t
70 kW/t
10.7 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost
667 km
414 mi
VolkswagenTiguan III1.4 TSI
724 km
450 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost
155 hp
116 kW
8.7 s
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
VolkswagenTiguan III1.4 TSI
150 hp
112 kW
9.2 s
207 km/h
129 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost
Power
155 hp
116 kW
0-100 km/h8.7 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
456 L
16.1 cu ft
Length
4,186 mm
164.8 in
Height
1,550 mm
61.0 in
VolkswagenTiguan III1.4 TSI
Power
150 hp
112 kW
0-100 km/h9.2 s
Top speed
207 km/h
129 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
652 L
23.0 cu ft
Length
4,539 mm
178.7 in
Height
1,658 mm
65.3 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost
Power
155 hp
116 kW
0-100 km/h8.7 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
6.3 L/100 km
37.3 mpg US
44.8 mpg UK
VolkswagenTiguan III1.4 TSI
Power
150 hp
112 kW
0-100 km/h9.2 s
Top speed
207 km/h
129 mph
7.6 L/100 km
30.9 mpg US
37.2 mpg UK

Ford Puma Facelift 2024 1.0 EcoBoost is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost
6.3 L/100 km
37.3 mpg US
44.8 mpg UK
8.7 s
VolkswagenTiguan III1.4 TSI
7.6 L/100 km
30.9 mpg US
37.2 mpg UK
9.2 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost
120 hp/t
89 kW/t
8.3 kg/hp
6.3 L/100 km
37.3 mpg US
44.8 mpg UK
VolkswagenTiguan III1.4 TSI
93 hp/t
70 kW/t
10.7 kg/hp
7.6 L/100 km
30.9 mpg US
37.2 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleFordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoostVolkswagenTiguan III1.4 TSI
Power
155 hp
116 kW
150 hp
112 kW
Torque
240 Nm
177 lb-ft
250 Nm
184 lb-ft
Acceleration
8.7 s
9.2 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
207 km/h
129 mph
Lightness
1,293 kg
2,851 lb
1,605 kg
3,538 lb
Fuel consumption
6.3 L/100 km
37.3 mpg US
44.8 mpg UK
7.6 L/100 km
30.9 mpg US
37.2 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
456 L
16.1 cu ft
Length
4,186 mm
164.8 in
Height
1,550 mm
61.0 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
652 L
23.0 cu ft
Length
4,539 mm
178.7 in
Height
1,658 mm
65.3 in
Range score
667 km
414 mi
724 km
450 mi
CO2 score
-
173 g/km
Trunk score
456 L
16.1 cu ft
652 L
23.0 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
120 hp/t
89 kW/t
8.3 kg/hp
93 hp/t
70 kW/t
10.7 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleFord Puma Facelift 2024 1.0 EcoBoostVolkswagen Tiguan III 1.4 TSI
Consumption6.3 L/100 km37.3 mpg US44.8 mpg UK7.6 L/100 km30.9 mpg US37.2 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km11.03 LC100 km13.30 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi17.74 LC100 mi21.40 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used945 L250 US gal208 UK gal1,140 L301 US gal251 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,654 LC/year1,995 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Ford Puma Facelift 2024 1.0 EcoBoost

  • Has 5 hp more
  • Is 312 kg lighter
  • Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 1.3 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 26 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Smallest trunk

Volkswagen Tiguan III 1.4 TSI

  • Has 10 Nm more
  • Has 57 km (35 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 196 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Highest torque
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost
Volkswagen Tiguan III 1.4 TSI
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

1.0 EcoBoost
1.0 EcoBoost
VS
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoostvsFordPuma1.0 EcoBoost
1.4 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
VolkswagenTiguan III1.4 TSIvsVolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TSI
1.0 EcoBoost
1.3 Turbo
VS
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoostvsMitsubishiASX II1.3 Turbo
1.4 TSI
2.0 TDI
VS
VolkswagenTiguan III1.4 TSIvsVolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TDI
1.0 EcoBoost
1.5 TSI
VS
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoostvsCupraFormentorFacelift 20241.5 TSI
1.4 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
VolkswagenTiguan III1.4 TSIvsVolkswagenTiguan I2.0 TSI
1.0 EcoBoost
1.3 DIG-T
VS
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoostvsNissanQashqai III (J12)Facelift 20241.3 DIG-T
1.4 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
VolkswagenTiguan III1.4 TSIvsVolkswagenTiguan IFacelift 20112.0 TSI
1.0 EcoBoost
1.5 TSI
VS
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoostvsVolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20221.5 TSI
1.0 EcoBoost
1.3 TCe
VS
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoostvsRenaultDuster IIFacelift 20241.3 TCe
1.4 TSI
1.5 eTSI
VS
VolkswagenTiguan III1.4 TSIvsVolkswagenT-Roc II1.5 eTSI
1.0 EcoBoost
D 2.0
VS
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoostvsMiniCountryman (U25)D 2.0
Ford Puma · Facelift 2024 1.0 EcoBoost vs Volkswagen Tiguan III 1.4 TSI - car comparison - FastVsFaster