Car comparison

Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoostvsLexus UX 200

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Ford Puma

1.0 EcoBoost

155 hp999 ccGasolineFWDManualTurbochargedSUV2020-2024
VS

Lexus UX

200

171 hp1987 ccGasolineFWDCVTNaturally aspiratedSUV2019-2023

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    9.0 s
  • Fastest top speed
    205 km/h
    127 mph
  • Highest torque
    240 Nm
    177 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,280 kg
    2,822 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    121 hp/t
    90 kW/t
    8.3 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    4.5 L/100 km
    52.3 mpg US
    62.8 mpg UK
  • Best overall score
    54/100
  • Best performance score
    42/100
  • Best economy score
    95/100

Lexus UX 200

  • Most powerful
    171 hp
    128 kW
  • Best practicality score
    88/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelFordPuma1.0 EcoBoostLexusUX200
Power
155hp116kW
171hp128kW
Torque
240Nm177lb-ft
205Nm151lb-ft
Curb weight
1,280kg2,822lb
1,540kg3,395lb
Gross weight
1,765kg3,891lb
1,980kg4,365lb
Top speed
205 km/h
127 mph
190 km/h
118 mph
To 99% top speed
80.2s99% target: 203 km/h / 126 mph
Calculated
77.1s99% target: 188 km/h / 117 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
9.0s
9.2s
0-200 km/h
62.9s
Calculated
-
0-60 mph
8.5s
Calculated
8.7s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
4.5L/100 km52.3mpg US62.8mpg UK
5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption highway
4L/100 km58.8mpg US70.6mpg UK
-
Quarter mile
16.6s
Calculated
16.7s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
121hp/t90kW/t55hp/1000 lb
Calculated
111hp/t83kW/t50hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
188Nm/t125lb-ft/ton
Calculated
133Nm/t89lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range-
810km504mi
Calculated
Displacement
999cc61cu in
1,987cc121cu in
Length
4,207mm166in
4,495mm177in
Width
1,805mm71in
1,840mm72in
Height
1,536mm60in
1,540mm61in
Wheelbase
2,588mm102in
2,640mm104in
Front track-
1,560mm61in
Rear track-
1,560mm61in
Ground clearance
166mm7in
160mm6in
Trunk volume
456L
-
Max trunk volume
1,216L
-
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank-
47L
CO2 emissions-
138g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoostLexus UX 200PowerTorque
  • Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost: Power / Torque
  • Lexus UX 200: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoost6,000 rpm2,500 rpm6,250 rpm
LexusUX2006,600 rpm4,800 rpm6,850 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricFordPuma1.0 EcoBoostLexusUX200
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
8.5 s
8.7 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
9.0 s
9.2 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
62.9 s
-
Top speed
205 km/h
127 mph
190 km/h
118 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.8 s
2.7 s
330 ft
101 m
7.2 s
7.2 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.8 s
10.8 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.9 s
14.0 s
1/4 mile
402 m
16.6 s
16.7 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
140 km/h
87 mph
135 km/h
84 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoost
155 hp
116 kW
LexusUX200
171 hp
128 kW

Lexus UX 200 has 16 hp more than Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost.

The biggest power difference is between Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost and Lexus UX 200: 16 hp (12 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoost
240 Nm
177 lb-ft
LexusUX200
205 Nm
151 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoost
1,280 kg
2,822 lb
LexusUX200
1,540 kg
3,395 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoost
205 km/h
127 mph
LexusUX200
190 km/h
118 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoost9.0 s
LexusUX2009.2 s

Although Lexus UX 200 has more power, Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost and Lexus UX 200: 0.2 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoost
4.5 L/100 km
52.3 mpg US
62.8 mpg UK
LexusUX200
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost and Lexus UX 200: 1.3 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoost
121 hp/t
90 kW/t
8.3 kg/hp
LexusUX200
111 hp/t
83 kW/t
9.0 kg/hp

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoost
155 hp
116 kW
9.0 s
205 km/h
127 mph
LexusUX200
171 hp
128 kW
9.2 s
190 km/h
118 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoost
Power
155 hp
116 kW
0-100 km/h9.0 s
Top speed
205 km/h
127 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
456 L
16.1 cu ft
Length
4,207 mm
165.6 in
Height
1,536 mm
60.5 in
LexusUX200
Power
171 hp
128 kW
0-100 km/h9.2 s
Top speed
190 km/h
118 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,495 mm
177.0 in
Height
1,540 mm
60.6 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoost
Power
155 hp
116 kW
0-100 km/h9.0 s
Top speed
205 km/h
127 mph
4.5 L/100 km
52.3 mpg US
62.8 mpg UK
LexusUX200
Power
171 hp
128 kW
0-100 km/h9.2 s
Top speed
190 km/h
118 mph
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK

Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoost
4.5 L/100 km
52.3 mpg US
62.8 mpg UK
9.0 s
LexusUX200
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK
9.2 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoost
121 hp/t
90 kW/t
8.3 kg/hp
4.5 L/100 km
52.3 mpg US
62.8 mpg UK
LexusUX200
111 hp/t
83 kW/t
9.0 kg/hp
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleFordPuma1.0 EcoBoostLexusUX200
Power
155 hp
116 kW
171 hp
128 kW
Torque
240 Nm
177 lb-ft
205 Nm
151 lb-ft
Acceleration
9.0 s
9.2 s
Top speed
205 km/h
127 mph
190 km/h
118 mph
Lightness
1,280 kg
2,822 lb
1,540 kg
3,395 lb
Fuel consumption
4.5 L/100 km
52.3 mpg US
62.8 mpg UK
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
456 L
16.1 cu ft
Length
4,207 mm
165.6 in
Height
1,536 mm
60.5 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,495 mm
177.0 in
Height
1,540 mm
60.6 in
Range score
-
810 km
504 mi
CO2 score
-
138 g/km
Trunk score
456 L
16.1 cu ft
-
Power-to-weight score
121 hp/t
90 kW/t
8.3 kg/hp
111 hp/t
83 kW/t
9.0 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleFord Puma 1.0 EcoBoostLexus UX 200
Consumption4.5 L/100 km52.3 mpg US62.8 mpg UK5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km7.88 LC100 km10.15 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi12.67 LC100 mi16.33 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used675 L178 US gal148 UK gal870 L230 US gal191 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,181 LC/year1,523 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost

  • Has 35 Nm more
  • Is 260 kg lighter
  • Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 15 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 1.3 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 10 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Lowest power

Lexus UX 200

  • Has 16 hp more

Pros

  • Most powerful

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost
Lexus UX 200
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

1.0 EcoBoost
1.0 EcoBoost
VS
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoostvsFordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost
200
350h
VS
LexusUX200vsLexusNX II (AZ20)350h
1.0 EcoBoost
1.5 TSI
VS
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoostvsCupraFormentor1.5 TSI
200
GLB 200
VS
LexusUX200vsMercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 200
1.0 EcoBoost
1.3 DIG-T
VS
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoostvsNissanQashqai III (J12)1.3 DIG-T
200
2.0 e-Skyactiv X
VS
LexusUX200vsMazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X
1.0 EcoBoost
35 TDI
VS
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoostvsAUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202035 TDI
200
GLA 200
VS
LexusUX200vsMercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 200
1.0 EcoBoost
Cooper D 2.0
VS
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoostvsMiniCountryman (F60)Facelift 2020Cooper D 2.0
200
40 TFSI
VS
LexusUX200vsAUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TFSI
1.0 EcoBoost
1.5 TSI
VS
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoostvsVolkswagenT-Cross1.5 TSI
200
300
VS
LexusUX200vsLexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300
Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost vs Lexus UX 200 - car comparison - FastVsFaster