Mazda CX-30
Car comparison
Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv XvsLexus UX 200
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonLexus UX
200
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv X
- Quickest 0-100 km/h9.0 s
- Fastest top speed204 km/h127 mph
- Most powerful186 hp139 kW
- Highest torque240 Nm177 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight120 hp/t89 kW/t8.4 kg/hp
- Best overall score54/100
- Best performance score42/100
Lexus UX 200
- Lightest1,540 kg3,395 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK
- Best estimated range810 km504 mi
- Best economy score91/100
- Best practicality score88/100
Specification comparison
| Model | MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X | LexusUX200 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 186hp139kW | 171hp128kW |
| Torque | 240Nm177lb-ft | 205Nm151lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,554kg3,426lb | 1,540kg3,395lb |
| Gross weight | 2,070kg4,564lb | 1,980kg4,365lb |
| Top speed | 204 km/h 127 mph | 190 km/h 118 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 81.4s99% target: 202 km/h / 125 mph Calculated | 77.1s99% target: 188 km/h / 117 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 9.0s | 9.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 67.9s Calculated | - |
| 0-60 mph | 8.5s Calculated | 8.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK | 5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.5s Calculated | 16.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 120hp/t89kW/t54hp/1000 lb Calculated | 111hp/t83kW/t50hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 154Nm/t103lb-ft/ton Calculated | 133Nm/t89lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 727km452mi Calculated | 810km504mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,998cc122cu in | 1,987cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,395mm173in | 4,495mm177in |
| Width | 1,795mm71in | 1,840mm72in |
| Height | 1,540mm61in | 1,540mm61in |
| Wheelbase | 2,655mm105in | 2,640mm104in |
| Front track | 1,565mm62in | 1,560mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,565mm62in | 1,560mm61in |
| Ground clearance | 180mm7in | 160mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 430L | - |
| Max trunk volume | 1,406L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 48L | 47L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 138g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv X: Power / Torque
- Lexus UX 200: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X | 6,000 rpm | 4,000 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| LexusUX200 | 6,600 rpm | 4,800 rpm | 6,850 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X | LexusUX200 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.5 s | 8.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 9.0 s | 9.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 67.9 s | - |
| Top speed | 204 km/h 127 mph | 190 km/h 118 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.2 s | 7.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.8 s | 10.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.9 s | 14.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.5 s | 16.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 139 km/h 86 mph | 135 km/h 84 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X | 186 hp 139 kW |
| LexusUX200 | 171 hp 128 kW |
Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv X has 15 hp more than Lexus UX 200.
The biggest power difference is between Lexus UX 200 and Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv X: 15 hp (11 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X | 240 Nm 177 lb-ft |
| LexusUX200 | 205 Nm 151 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X | 1,554 kg 3,426 lb |
| LexusUX200 | 1,540 kg 3,395 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X | 204 km/h 127 mph |
| LexusUX200 | 190 km/h 118 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X | 9.0 s |
| LexusUX200 | 9.2 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv X and Lexus UX 200: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK |
| LexusUX200 | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Lexus UX 200 and Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv X: 0.8 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X | 120 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp |
| LexusUX200 | 111 hp/t 83 kW/t 9.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X | 727 km 452 mi |
| LexusUX200 | 810 km 504 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X | 186 hp 139 kW | 9.0 s | 204 km/h 127 mph |
| LexusUX200 | 171 hp 128 kW | 9.2 s | 190 km/h 118 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| LexusUX200 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X |
| 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| LexusUX200 |
| 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv X is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | 9.0 s |
| LexusUX200 | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | 9.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X | 120 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK |
| LexusUX200 | 111 hp/t 83 kW/t 9.0 kg/hp | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X | LexusUX200 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 186 hp 139 kW | 171 hp 128 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 240 Nm 177 lb-ft | 205 Nm 151 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 9.0 s | 9.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 204 km/h 127 mph | 190 km/h 118 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,554 kg 3,426 lb | 1,540 kg 3,395 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 727 km 452 mi | 810 km 504 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 138 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 430 L 15.2 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 120 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp | 111 hp/t 83 kW/t 9.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv X | Lexus UX 200 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.6 L/100 km35.6 mpg US42.8 mpg UK | 5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.55 LC100 km | 10.15 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 18.59 LC100 mi | 16.33 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 990 L262 US gal218 UK gal | 870 L230 US gal191 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,733 LC/year | 1,523 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv X
- Has 15 hp more
- Has 35 Nm more
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 14 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
- Has 9 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Lexus UX 200
- Is 14 kg lighter
- Uses 0.8 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 83 km (52 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























