Car comparison

Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoostvsCupra Formentor 1.5 TSI

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Ford Puma

1.0 EcoBoost

155 hp999 ccGasolineFWDManualTurbochargedSUV2020-2024
VS

Cupra Formentor

1.5 TSI

150 hp1498 ccGasolineFWDManualTurbochargedSUV2020-2024

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost

  • Fastest top speed
    205 km/h
    127 mph
  • Most powerful
    155 hp
    116 kW
  • Lightest
    1,280 kg
    2,822 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    121 hp/t
    90 kW/t
    8.3 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    4.5 L/100 km
    52.3 mpg US
    62.8 mpg UK
  • Largest trunk
    456 L
  • Best overall score
    54/100
  • Best performance score
    42/100
  • Best economy score
    95/100
  • Best practicality score
    81/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelFordPuma1.0 EcoBoostCupraFormentor1.5 TSI
Power
155hp116kW
150hp112kW
Torque
240Nm177lb-ft
250Nm184lb-ft
Curb weight
1,280kg2,822lb
1,362kg3,003lb
Gross weight
1,765kg3,891lb
1,960kg4,321lb
Top speed
205 km/h
127 mph
204 km/h
127 mph
To 99% top speed
80.2s99% target: 203 km/h / 126 mph
Calculated
81.2s99% target: 202 km/h / 125 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
9.0s
8.9s
0-200 km/h
62.9s
Calculated
67.7s
Calculated
0-60 mph
8.5s
Calculated
8.4s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
4.5L/100 km52.3mpg US62.8mpg UK
6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption highway
4L/100 km58.8mpg US70.6mpg UK
-
Quarter mile
16.6s
Calculated
16.5s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
121hp/t90kW/t55hp/1000 lb
Calculated
110hp/t82kW/t50hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
188Nm/t125lb-ft/ton
Calculated
184Nm/t123lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range-
746km464mi
Calculated
Displacement
999cc61cu in
1,498cc91cu in
Length
4,207mm166in
4,450mm175in
Width
1,805mm71in
1,839mm72in
Height
1,536mm60in
1,528mm60in
Wheelbase
2,588mm102in
2,680mm106in
Front track-
1,585mm62in
Rear track-
1,559mm61in
Ground clearance
166mm7in
-
Trunk volume
456L
450L
Max trunk volume
1,216L
-
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank-
50L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoostCupra Formentor 1.5 TSIPowerTorque
  • Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost: Power / Torque
  • Cupra Formentor 1.5 TSI: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoost6,000 rpm2,500 rpm6,250 rpm
CupraFormentor1.5 TSI5,000-6,000 rpm1,500-3,500 rpm6,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricFordPuma1.0 EcoBoostCupraFormentor1.5 TSI
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
8.5 s
8.4 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
9.0 s
8.9 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
62.9 s
67.7 s
Top speed
205 km/h
127 mph
204 km/h
127 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.8 s
2.7 s
330 ft
101 m
7.2 s
7.2 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.8 s
10.8 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.9 s
13.9 s
1/4 mile
402 m
16.6 s
16.5 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
140 km/h
87 mph
139 km/h
87 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoost
155 hp
116 kW
CupraFormentor1.5 TSI
150 hp
112 kW

Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost has 5 hp more than Cupra Formentor 1.5 TSI.

The biggest power difference is between Cupra Formentor 1.5 TSI and Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost: 5 hp (4 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoost
240 Nm
177 lb-ft
CupraFormentor1.5 TSI
250 Nm
184 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoost
1,280 kg
2,822 lb
CupraFormentor1.5 TSI
1,362 kg
3,003 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoost
205 km/h
127 mph
CupraFormentor1.5 TSI
204 km/h
127 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoost9.0 s
CupraFormentor1.5 TSI8.9 s

Although Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost has more power, Cupra Formentor 1.5 TSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Cupra Formentor 1.5 TSI and Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost: 0.1 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoost
4.5 L/100 km
52.3 mpg US
62.8 mpg UK
CupraFormentor1.5 TSI
6.7 L/100 km
35.1 mpg US
42.2 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost and Cupra Formentor 1.5 TSI: 2.2 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoost
121 hp/t
90 kW/t
8.3 kg/hp
CupraFormentor1.5 TSI
110 hp/t
82 kW/t
9.1 kg/hp

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoost
155 hp
116 kW
9.0 s
205 km/h
127 mph
CupraFormentor1.5 TSI
150 hp
112 kW
8.9 s
204 km/h
127 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoost
Power
155 hp
116 kW
0-100 km/h9.0 s
Top speed
205 km/h
127 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
456 L
16.1 cu ft
Length
4,207 mm
165.6 in
Height
1,536 mm
60.5 in
CupraFormentor1.5 TSI
Power
150 hp
112 kW
0-100 km/h8.9 s
Top speed
204 km/h
127 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
450 L
15.9 cu ft
Length
4,450 mm
175.2 in
Height
1,528 mm
60.2 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoost
Power
155 hp
116 kW
0-100 km/h9.0 s
Top speed
205 km/h
127 mph
4.5 L/100 km
52.3 mpg US
62.8 mpg UK
CupraFormentor1.5 TSI
Power
150 hp
112 kW
0-100 km/h8.9 s
Top speed
204 km/h
127 mph
6.7 L/100 km
35.1 mpg US
42.2 mpg UK

Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoost
4.5 L/100 km
52.3 mpg US
62.8 mpg UK
9.0 s
CupraFormentor1.5 TSI
6.7 L/100 km
35.1 mpg US
42.2 mpg UK
8.9 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoost
121 hp/t
90 kW/t
8.3 kg/hp
4.5 L/100 km
52.3 mpg US
62.8 mpg UK
CupraFormentor1.5 TSI
110 hp/t
82 kW/t
9.1 kg/hp
6.7 L/100 km
35.1 mpg US
42.2 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleFordPuma1.0 EcoBoostCupraFormentor1.5 TSI
Power
155 hp
116 kW
150 hp
112 kW
Torque
240 Nm
177 lb-ft
250 Nm
184 lb-ft
Acceleration
9.0 s
8.9 s
Top speed
205 km/h
127 mph
204 km/h
127 mph
Lightness
1,280 kg
2,822 lb
1,362 kg
3,003 lb
Fuel consumption
4.5 L/100 km
52.3 mpg US
62.8 mpg UK
6.7 L/100 km
35.1 mpg US
42.2 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
456 L
16.1 cu ft
Length
4,207 mm
165.6 in
Height
1,536 mm
60.5 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
450 L
15.9 cu ft
Length
4,450 mm
175.2 in
Height
1,528 mm
60.2 in
Range score
-
746 km
464 mi
Trunk score
456 L
16.1 cu ft
450 L
15.9 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
121 hp/t
90 kW/t
8.3 kg/hp
110 hp/t
82 kW/t
9.1 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleFord Puma 1.0 EcoBoostCupra Formentor 1.5 TSI
Consumption4.5 L/100 km52.3 mpg US62.8 mpg UK6.7 L/100 km35.1 mpg US42.2 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km7.88 LC100 km11.73 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi12.67 LC100 mi18.87 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used675 L178 US gal148 UK gal1,005 L265 US gal221 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,181 LC/year1,759 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost

  • Has 5 hp more
  • Is 82 kg lighter
  • Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 2.2 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 11 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 6 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h

Cupra Formentor 1.5 TSI

  • Has 10 Nm more
  • Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest torque

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost
Cupra Formentor 1.5 TSI
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

1.0 EcoBoost
1.0 EcoBoost
VS
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoostvsFordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost
1.5 TSI
1.5 TSI
VS
CupraFormentor1.5 TSIvsCupraFormentorFacelift 20241.5 TSI
1.0 EcoBoost
1.5 TSI
VS
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoostvsCupraFormentor1.5 TSI
1.5 TSI
1.5 TSI
VS
CupraFormentor1.5 TSIvsCupraTerramar1.5 TSI
1.0 EcoBoost
1.3 DIG-T
VS
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoostvsNissanQashqai III (J12)1.3 DIG-T
1.5 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
CupraFormentor1.5 TSIvsCupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI
1.0 EcoBoost
35 TDI
VS
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoostvsAUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202035 TDI
1.5 TSI
GLA 200d
VS
CupraFormentor1.5 TSIvsMercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 200d
1.5 TSI
Cooper D 2.0
VS
CupraFormentor1.5 TSIvsMiniCountryman (F60)Facelift 2020Cooper D 2.0
1.5 TSI
GLB 200d
VS
CupraFormentor1.5 TSIvsMercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 200d
1.0 EcoBoost
1.5 TSI
VS
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoostvsVolkswagenT-Cross1.5 TSI
1.0 EcoBoost
35 TFSI
VS
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoostvsAUDIQ2LFacelift 202135 TFSI
Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost vs Cupra Formentor 1.5 TSI - car comparison - FastVsFaster