Cupra Formentor
Car comparison
Cupra Formentor 1.5 TSIvsMercedes-Benz GLB (X247) GLB 200d
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz GLB (X247)
GLB 200d
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) GLB 200d
- Highest torque320 Nm236 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.0 L/100 km47.0 mpg US56.5 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,040 km646 mi
- Largest trunk570 L
- Best overall score56/100
- Best performance score42/100
- Best economy score93/100
- Best practicality score87/100
Cupra Formentor 1.5 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.9 s
- Fastest top speed204 km/h127 mph
- Most powerful150 hp112 kW
- Lightest1,362 kg3,003 lb
- Best power-to-weight110 hp/t82 kW/t9.1 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | CupraFormentor1.5 TSI | Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 200d |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 150hp112kW | 150hp112kW |
| Torque | 250Nm184lb-ft | 320Nm236lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,362kg3,003lb | 1,605kg3,538lb |
| Gross weight | 1,960kg4,321lb | 2,195kg4,839lb |
| Top speed | 204 km/h 127 mph | 204 km/h 127 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 81.2s99% target: 202 km/h / 125 mph Calculated | 85.0s99% target: 202 km/h / 125 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.9s | 9.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 67.7s Calculated | 70.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.4s Calculated | 8.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK | 5L/100 km47mpg US56.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 4.5L/100 km52.3mpg US62.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.5s Calculated | 16.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 110hp/t82kW/t50hp/1000 lb Calculated | 93hp/t70kW/t42hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 184Nm/t123lb-ft/ton Calculated | 199Nm/t133lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 746km464mi Calculated | 1,040km646mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,498cc91cu in | 1,951cc119cu in |
| Length | 4,450mm175in | 4,634mm182in |
| Width | 1,839mm72in | 1,834mm72in |
| Height | 1,528mm60in | 1,662mm65in |
| Wheelbase | 2,680mm106in | 2,829mm111in |
| Front track | 1,585mm62in | 1,605mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,559mm61in | 1,606mm63in |
| Ground clearance | - | 135mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 450L | 570L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,805L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 50L | 52L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 133g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Cupra Formentor 1.5 TSI: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) GLB 200d: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| CupraFormentor1.5 TSI | 5,000-6,000 rpm | 1,500-3,500 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 200d | 3,400-4,440 rpm | 1,400-2,600 rpm | 4,690 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | CupraFormentor1.5 TSI | Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 200d |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.4 s | 8.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.9 s | 9.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 67.7 s | 70.7 s |
| Top speed | 204 km/h 127 mph | 204 km/h 127 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.2 s | 7.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.8 s | 10.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.9 s | 13.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.5 s | 16.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 139 km/h 87 mph | 138 km/h 86 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraFormentor1.5 TSI | 150 hp 112 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 200d | 150 hp 112 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraFormentor1.5 TSI | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 200d | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraFormentor1.5 TSI | 1,362 kg 3,003 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 200d | 1,605 kg 3,538 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraFormentor1.5 TSI | 204 km/h 127 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 200d | 204 km/h 127 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraFormentor1.5 TSI | 8.9 s |
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 200d | 9.0 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Cupra Formentor 1.5 TSI and Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) GLB 200d: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraFormentor1.5 TSI | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 200d | 5.0 L/100 km 47.0 mpg US 56.5 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) GLB 200d and Cupra Formentor 1.5 TSI: 1.7 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraFormentor1.5 TSI | 110 hp/t 82 kW/t 9.1 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 200d | 93 hp/t 70 kW/t 10.7 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraFormentor1.5 TSI | 746 km 464 mi |
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 200d | 1,040 km 646 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| CupraFormentor1.5 TSI | 150 hp 112 kW | 8.9 s | 204 km/h 127 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 200d | 150 hp 112 kW | 9.0 s | 204 km/h 127 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CupraFormentor1.5 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 200d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CupraFormentor1.5 TSI |
| 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 200d |
| 5.0 L/100 km 47.0 mpg US 56.5 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) GLB 200d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| CupraFormentor1.5 TSI | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | 8.9 s |
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 200d | 5.0 L/100 km 47.0 mpg US 56.5 mpg UK | 9.0 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| CupraFormentor1.5 TSI | 110 hp/t 82 kW/t 9.1 kg/hp | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 200d | 93 hp/t 70 kW/t 10.7 kg/hp | 5.0 L/100 km 47.0 mpg US 56.5 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | CupraFormentor1.5 TSI | Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 200d | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 150 hp 112 kW | 150 hp 112 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.9 s | 9.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 204 km/h 127 mph | 204 km/h 127 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,362 kg 3,003 lb | 1,605 kg 3,538 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | 5.0 L/100 km 47.0 mpg US 56.5 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 746 km 464 mi | 1,040 km 646 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 133 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 450 L 15.9 cu ft | 570 L 20.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 110 hp/t 82 kW/t 9.1 kg/hp | 93 hp/t 70 kW/t 10.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Cupra Formentor 1.5 TSI | Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) GLB 200d |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.7 L/100 km35.1 mpg US42.2 mpg UK | 5 L/100 km47 mpg US56.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.73 LC100 km | 8.75 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 18.87 LC100 mi | 14.08 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,005 L265 US gal221 UK gal | 750 L198 US gal165 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,759 LC/year | 1,313 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Cupra Formentor 1.5 TSI
- Is 243 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 17 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) GLB 200d
- Has 70 Nm more
- Uses 1.7 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 294 km (183 mi) more estimated range
- Has 120 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























