Car comparison

AUDI Q5 II (FY) · Facelift 2020 35 TDIvsFord Puma 1.0 EcoBoost

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

AUDI Q5 II (FY) · Facelift 2020

35 TDI

163 hp1968 ccDieselFWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2020-2024
VS

Ford Puma

1.0 EcoBoost

155 hp999 ccGasolineFWDManualTurbochargedSUV2020-2024

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

AUDI Q5 II (FY) Facelift 2020 35 TDI

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    9.0 s
  • Fastest top speed
    213 km/h
    132 mph
  • Most powerful
    163 hp
    122 kW
  • Highest torque
    370 Nm
    273 lb-ft
  • Largest trunk
    520 L
  • Best overall score
    56/100
  • Best performance score
    43/100
  • Best practicality score
    85/100

Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost

  • Lightest
    1,280 kg
    2,822 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    121 hp/t
    90 kW/t
    8.3 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    4.5 L/100 km
    52.3 mpg US
    62.8 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    5.3 L/100 km
    44.4 mpg US
    53.3 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    4.0 L/100 km
    58.8 mpg US
    70.6 mpg UK
  • Best economy score
    95/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelAUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202035 TDIFordPuma1.0 EcoBoost
Power
163hp122kW
155hp116kW
Torque
370Nm273lb-ft
240Nm177lb-ft
Curb weight
1,740kg3,836lb
1,280kg2,822lb
Gross weight
2,420kg5,335lb
1,765kg3,891lb
Top speed
213 km/h
132 mph
205 km/h
127 mph
To 99% top speed
95.8s99% target: 211 km/h / 131 mph
Calculated
80.2s99% target: 203 km/h / 126 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
9.0s
9.0s
0-200 km/h
52.9s
Calculated
62.9s
Calculated
0-60 mph
8.5s
Calculated
8.5s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK
4.5L/100 km52.3mpg US62.8mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK
5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
4.4L/100 km53.5mpg US64.2mpg UK
4L/100 km58.8mpg US70.6mpg UK
Quarter mile
16.5s
Calculated
16.6s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
94hp/t70kW/t42hp/1000 lb
Calculated
121hp/t90kW/t55hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
213Nm/t142lb-ft/ton
Calculated
188Nm/t125lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,354km841mi
Calculated
-
Displacement
1,968cc120cu in
999cc61cu in
Length
4,682mm184in
4,207mm166in
Width
1,893mm75in
1,805mm71in
Height
1,637mm64in
1,536mm60in
Wheelbase
2,819mm111in
2,588mm102in
Front track
1,623mm64in
-
Rear track
1,611mm63in
-
Ground clearance-
166mm7in
Trunk volume
520L
456L
Max trunk volume
1,520L
1,216L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
65L
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

AUDI Q5 II (FY) Facelift 2020 35 TDIFord Puma 1.0 EcoBoostPowerTorque
  • AUDI Q5 II (FY) Facelift 2020 35 TDI: Power / Torque
  • Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202035 TDI3,250-4,200 rpm1,500-3,000 rpm4,450 rpm
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoost6,000 rpm2,500 rpm6,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricAUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202035 TDIFordPuma1.0 EcoBoost
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
8.5 s
8.5 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
9.0 s
9.0 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
52.9 s
62.9 s
Top speed
213 km/h
132 mph
205 km/h
127 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.7 s
2.8 s
330 ft
101 m
7.1 s
7.2 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.8 s
10.8 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.9 s
13.9 s
1/4 mile
402 m
16.5 s
16.6 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
139 km/h
86 mph
140 km/h
87 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202035 TDI
163 hp
122 kW
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoost
155 hp
116 kW

AUDI Q5 II (FY) Facelift 2020 35 TDI has 8 hp more than Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost.

The biggest power difference is between Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost and AUDI Q5 II (FY) Facelift 2020 35 TDI: 8 hp (6 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202035 TDI
370 Nm
273 lb-ft
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoost
240 Nm
177 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202035 TDI
1,740 kg
3,836 lb
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoost
1,280 kg
2,822 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202035 TDI
213 km/h
132 mph
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoost
205 km/h
127 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202035 TDI9.0 s
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoost9.0 s

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202035 TDI
4.8 L/100 km
49.0 mpg US
58.9 mpg UK
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoost
4.5 L/100 km
52.3 mpg US
62.8 mpg UK

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202035 TDI
94 hp/t
70 kW/t
10.7 kg/hp
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoost
121 hp/t
90 kW/t
8.3 kg/hp

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202035 TDI
163 hp
122 kW
9.0 s
213 km/h
132 mph
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoost
155 hp
116 kW
9.0 s
205 km/h
127 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202035 TDI
Power
163 hp
122 kW
0-100 km/h9.0 s
Top speed
213 km/h
132 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
520 L
18.4 cu ft
Length
4,682 mm
184.3 in
Height
1,637 mm
64.4 in
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoost
Power
155 hp
116 kW
0-100 km/h9.0 s
Top speed
205 km/h
127 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
456 L
16.1 cu ft
Length
4,207 mm
165.6 in
Height
1,536 mm
60.5 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202035 TDI
Power
163 hp
122 kW
0-100 km/h9.0 s
Top speed
213 km/h
132 mph
4.8 L/100 km
49.0 mpg US
58.9 mpg UK
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoost
Power
155 hp
116 kW
0-100 km/h9.0 s
Top speed
205 km/h
127 mph
4.5 L/100 km
52.3 mpg US
62.8 mpg UK

AUDI Q5 II (FY) Facelift 2020 35 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202035 TDI
4.8 L/100 km
49.0 mpg US
58.9 mpg UK
9.0 s
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoost
4.5 L/100 km
52.3 mpg US
62.8 mpg UK
9.0 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202035 TDI
94 hp/t
70 kW/t
10.7 kg/hp
4.8 L/100 km
49.0 mpg US
58.9 mpg UK
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoost
121 hp/t
90 kW/t
8.3 kg/hp
4.5 L/100 km
52.3 mpg US
62.8 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleAUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202035 TDIFordPuma1.0 EcoBoost
Power
163 hp
122 kW
155 hp
116 kW
Torque
370 Nm
273 lb-ft
240 Nm
177 lb-ft
Acceleration
9.0 s
9.0 s
Top speed
213 km/h
132 mph
205 km/h
127 mph
Lightness
1,740 kg
3,836 lb
1,280 kg
2,822 lb
Fuel consumption
4.8 L/100 km
49.0 mpg US
58.9 mpg UK
4.5 L/100 km
52.3 mpg US
62.8 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
520 L
18.4 cu ft
Length
4,682 mm
184.3 in
Height
1,637 mm
64.4 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
456 L
16.1 cu ft
Length
4,207 mm
165.6 in
Height
1,536 mm
60.5 in
Range score
1,354 km
841 mi
-
Trunk score
520 L
18.4 cu ft
456 L
16.1 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
94 hp/t
70 kW/t
10.7 kg/hp
121 hp/t
90 kW/t
8.3 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleAUDI Q5 II (FY) Facelift 2020 35 TDIFord Puma 1.0 EcoBoost
Consumption4.8 L/100 km49 mpg US58.9 mpg UK4.5 L/100 km52.3 mpg US62.8 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km8.40 LC100 km7.88 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi13.52 LC100 mi12.67 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used720 L190 US gal158 UK gal675 L178 US gal148 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,260 LC/year1,181 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

AUDI Q5 II (FY) Facelift 2020 35 TDI

  • Has 8 hp more
  • Has 130 Nm more
  • Has 8 km/h (5 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 64 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest

Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost

  • Is 460 kg lighter
  • Uses 0.3 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 27 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
AUDI Q5 II (FY) 35 TDI
Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

35 TDI
40 TDI
VS
AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202035 TDIvsAUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI
1.0 EcoBoost
1.0 EcoBoost
VS
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoostvsFordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost
35 TDI
2.0 TFSI
VS
AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202035 TDIvsAUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI
1.0 EcoBoost
1.5 TSI
VS
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoostvsCupraFormentor1.5 TSI
35 TDI
2.0 TFSI
VS
AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202035 TDIvsAUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TFSI
1.0 EcoBoost
1.3 DIG-T
VS
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoostvsNissanQashqai III (J12)1.3 DIG-T
35 TDI
2.0 TFSI
VS
AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202035 TDIvsAUDIQ5 I (8R)2.0 TFSI
1.0 EcoBoost
GLA 200d
VS
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoostvsMercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 200d
35 TDI
40 TFSI
VS
AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202035 TDIvsAUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TFSI
1.0 EcoBoost
Cooper D 2.0
VS
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoostvsMiniCountryman (F60)Facelift 2020Cooper D 2.0
35 TDI
35 TFSI
VS
AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202035 TDIvsAUDIQ2LFacelift 202135 TFSI
1.0 EcoBoost
1.5 TSI
VS
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoostvsVolkswagenT-Cross1.5 TSI
AUDI Q5 II (FY) · Facelift 2020 35 TDI vs Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost - car comparison - FastVsFaster