Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247)
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) GLA 200dvsFord Puma 1.0 EcoBoost
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonFord Puma
1.0 EcoBoost
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost
- Most powerful155 hp116 kW
- Lightest1,280 kg2,822 lb
- Best power-to-weight121 hp/t90 kW/t8.3 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.5 L/100 km52.3 mpg US62.8 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.3 L/100 km44.4 mpg US53.3 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.0 L/100 km58.8 mpg US70.6 mpg UK
- Largest trunk456 L
- Best economy score95/100
Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) GLA 200d
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.9 s
- Fastest top speed205 km/h127 mph
- Highest torque320 Nm236 lb-ft
- Best overall score54/100
- Best performance score42/100
- Best practicality score81/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 200d | FordPuma1.0 EcoBoost |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 150hp112kW | 155hp116kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 240Nm177lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,595kg3,516lb | 1,280kg2,822lb |
| Gross weight | 2,190kg4,828lb | 1,765kg3,891lb |
| Top speed | 205 km/h 127 mph | 205 km/h 127 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 84.7s99% target: 203 km/h / 126 mph Calculated | 80.2s99% target: 203 km/h / 126 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.9s | 9.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 65.9s Calculated | 62.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.4s Calculated | 8.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK | 4.5L/100 km52.3mpg US62.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK | 5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.6L/100 km51.1mpg US61.4mpg UK | 4L/100 km58.8mpg US70.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.5s Calculated | 16.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 94hp/t70kW/t43hp/1000 lb Calculated | 121hp/t90kW/t55hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 201Nm/t134lb-ft/ton Calculated | 188Nm/t125lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 981km609mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 1,950cc119cu in | 999cc61cu in |
| Length | 4,410mm174in | 4,207mm166in |
| Width | 1,834mm72in | 1,805mm71in |
| Height | 1,611mm63in | 1,536mm60in |
| Wheelbase | 2,729mm107in | 2,588mm102in |
| Front track | 1,605mm63in | - |
| Rear track | 1,606mm63in | - |
| Ground clearance | 143mm6in | 166mm7in |
| Trunk volume | 425L | 456L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,420L | 1,216L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 51L | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) GLA 200d: Power / Torque
- Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 200d | 3,400-4,440 rpm | 1,400-3,200 rpm | 4,690 rpm |
| FordPuma1.0 EcoBoost | 6,000 rpm | 2,500 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 200d | FordPuma1.0 EcoBoost |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.4 s | 8.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.9 s | 9.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 65.9 s | 62.9 s |
| Top speed | 205 km/h 127 mph | 205 km/h 127 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.1 s | 7.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.7 s | 10.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.9 s | 13.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.5 s | 16.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 139 km/h 86 mph | 140 km/h 87 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 200d | 150 hp 112 kW |
| FordPuma1.0 EcoBoost | 155 hp 116 kW |
Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost has 5 hp more than Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) GLA 200d.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) GLA 200d and Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost: 5 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 200d | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| FordPuma1.0 EcoBoost | 240 Nm 177 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 200d | 1,595 kg 3,516 lb |
| FordPuma1.0 EcoBoost | 1,280 kg 2,822 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 200d | 205 km/h 127 mph |
| FordPuma1.0 EcoBoost | 205 km/h 127 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 200d | 8.9 s |
| FordPuma1.0 EcoBoost | 9.0 s |
Although Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost has more power, Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) GLA 200d is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) GLA 200d and Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 200d | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK |
| FordPuma1.0 EcoBoost | 4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost and Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) GLA 200d: 0.7 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 200d | 94 hp/t 70 kW/t 10.6 kg/hp |
| FordPuma1.0 EcoBoost | 121 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 200d | 150 hp 112 kW | 8.9 s | 205 km/h 127 mph |
| FordPuma1.0 EcoBoost | 155 hp 116 kW | 9.0 s | 205 km/h 127 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 200d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| FordPuma1.0 EcoBoost |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 200d |
| 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| FordPuma1.0 EcoBoost |
| 4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK | ||||||
Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 200d | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK | 8.9 s |
| FordPuma1.0 EcoBoost | 4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK | 9.0 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 200d | 94 hp/t 70 kW/t 10.6 kg/hp | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK |
| FordPuma1.0 EcoBoost | 121 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp | 4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 200d | FordPuma1.0 EcoBoost | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 150 hp 112 kW | 155 hp 116 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 240 Nm 177 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.9 s | 9.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 205 km/h 127 mph | 205 km/h 127 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,595 kg 3,516 lb | 1,280 kg 2,822 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK | 4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 981 km 609 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 425 L 15.0 cu ft | 456 L 16.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 94 hp/t 70 kW/t 10.6 kg/hp | 121 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) GLA 200d | Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.2 L/100 km45.2 mpg US54.3 mpg UK | 4.5 L/100 km52.3 mpg US62.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 9.10 LC100 km | 7.88 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 14.65 LC100 mi | 12.67 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 780 L206 US gal172 UK gal | 675 L178 US gal148 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,365 LC/year | 1,181 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) GLA 200d
- Has 80 Nm more
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost
- Has 5 hp more
- Is 315 kg lighter
- Uses 0.7 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 27 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 31 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























