Car comparison

Mini Countryman (F60) · Facelift 2020 Cooper D 2.0vsFord Puma 1.0 EcoBoost

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Mini Countryman (F60) · Facelift 2020

Cooper D 2.0

150 hp1995 ccDieselAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2020-2023
VS

Ford Puma

1.0 EcoBoost

155 hp999 ccGasolineFWDManualTurbochargedSUV2020-2024

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Mini Countryman (F60) Facelift 2020 Cooper D 2.0

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    9.0 s
  • Fastest top speed
    211 km/h
    131 mph
  • Highest torque
    350 Nm
    258 lb-ft
  • Lowest city consumption
    5.2 L/100 km
    45.2 mpg US
    54.3 mpg UK
  • Best overall score
    55/100
  • Best performance score
    43/100
  • Best practicality score
    81/100

Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost

  • Most powerful
    155 hp
    116 kW
  • Lightest
    1,280 kg
    2,822 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    121 hp/t
    90 kW/t
    8.3 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    4.5 L/100 km
    52.3 mpg US
    62.8 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    4.0 L/100 km
    58.8 mpg US
    70.6 mpg UK
  • Largest trunk
    456 L
  • Best economy score
    95/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelMiniCountryman (F60)Facelift 2020Cooper D 2.0FordPuma1.0 EcoBoost
Power
150hp112kW
155hp116kW
Torque
350Nm258lb-ft
240Nm177lb-ft
Curb weight
1,570kg3,461lb
1,280kg2,822lb
Gross weight
2,145kg4,729lb
1,765kg3,891lb
Top speed
211 km/h
131 mph
205 km/h
127 mph
To 99% top speed
89.2s99% target: 209 km/h / 130 mph
Calculated
80.2s99% target: 203 km/h / 126 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
9.0s
9.0s
0-200 km/h
53.2s
Calculated
62.9s
Calculated
0-60 mph
8.5s
Calculated
8.5s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK
4.5L/100 km52.3mpg US62.8mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK
5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
4.6L/100 km51.1mpg US61.4mpg UK
4L/100 km58.8mpg US70.6mpg UK
Quarter mile
16.5s
Calculated
16.6s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
96hp/t71kW/t43hp/1000 lb
Calculated
121hp/t90kW/t55hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
223Nm/t149lb-ft/ton
Calculated
188Nm/t125lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,063km660mi
Calculated
-
Displacement
1,995cc122cu in
999cc61cu in
Length
4,297mm169in
4,207mm166in
Width
1,822mm72in
1,805mm71in
Height
1,557mm61in
1,536mm60in
Wheelbase
2,670mm105in
2,588mm102in
Front track
1,585mm62in
-
Rear track
1,587mm62in
-
Ground clearance
165mm6in
166mm7in
Trunk volume
450L
456L
Max trunk volume
1,390L
1,216L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
51L
-
CO2 emissions
127g/km
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Mini Countryman (F60) Facelift 2020 Cooper D 2.0Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoostPowerTorque
  • Mini Countryman (F60) Facelift 2020 Cooper D 2.0: Power / Torque
  • Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
MiniCountryman (F60)Facelift 2020Cooper D 2.04,000 rpm1,750-2,500 rpm4,250 rpm
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoost6,000 rpm2,500 rpm6,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricMiniCountryman (F60)Facelift 2020Cooper D 2.0FordPuma1.0 EcoBoost
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
8.5 s
8.5 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
9.0 s
9.0 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
53.2 s
62.9 s
Top speed
211 km/h
131 mph
205 km/h
127 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.7 s
2.8 s
330 ft
101 m
7.2 s
7.2 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.8 s
10.8 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.9 s
13.9 s
1/4 mile
402 m
16.5 s
16.6 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
140 km/h
87 mph
140 km/h
87 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniCountryman (F60)Facelift 2020Cooper D 2.0
150 hp
112 kW
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoost
155 hp
116 kW

Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost has 5 hp more than Mini Countryman (F60) Facelift 2020 Cooper D 2.0.

The biggest power difference is between Mini Countryman (F60) Facelift 2020 Cooper D 2.0 and Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost: 5 hp (4 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniCountryman (F60)Facelift 2020Cooper D 2.0
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoost
240 Nm
177 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniCountryman (F60)Facelift 2020Cooper D 2.0
1,570 kg
3,461 lb
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoost
1,280 kg
2,822 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniCountryman (F60)Facelift 2020Cooper D 2.0
211 km/h
131 mph
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoost
205 km/h
127 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniCountryman (F60)Facelift 2020Cooper D 2.09.0 s
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoost9.0 s

Although Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost has more power, Mini Countryman (F60) Facelift 2020 Cooper D 2.0 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniCountryman (F60)Facelift 2020Cooper D 2.0
4.8 L/100 km
49.0 mpg US
58.9 mpg UK
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoost
4.5 L/100 km
52.3 mpg US
62.8 mpg UK

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniCountryman (F60)Facelift 2020Cooper D 2.0
96 hp/t
71 kW/t
10.5 kg/hp
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoost
121 hp/t
90 kW/t
8.3 kg/hp

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
MiniCountryman (F60)Facelift 2020Cooper D 2.0
150 hp
112 kW
9.0 s
211 km/h
131 mph
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoost
155 hp
116 kW
9.0 s
205 km/h
127 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
MiniCountryman (F60)Facelift 2020Cooper D 2.0
Power
150 hp
112 kW
0-100 km/h9.0 s
Top speed
211 km/h
131 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
450 L
15.9 cu ft
Length
4,297 mm
169.2 in
Height
1,557 mm
61.3 in
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoost
Power
155 hp
116 kW
0-100 km/h9.0 s
Top speed
205 km/h
127 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
456 L
16.1 cu ft
Length
4,207 mm
165.6 in
Height
1,536 mm
60.5 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
MiniCountryman (F60)Facelift 2020Cooper D 2.0
Power
150 hp
112 kW
0-100 km/h9.0 s
Top speed
211 km/h
131 mph
4.8 L/100 km
49.0 mpg US
58.9 mpg UK
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoost
Power
155 hp
116 kW
0-100 km/h9.0 s
Top speed
205 km/h
127 mph
4.5 L/100 km
52.3 mpg US
62.8 mpg UK

Mini Countryman (F60) Facelift 2020 Cooper D 2.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
MiniCountryman (F60)Facelift 2020Cooper D 2.0
4.8 L/100 km
49.0 mpg US
58.9 mpg UK
9.0 s
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoost
4.5 L/100 km
52.3 mpg US
62.8 mpg UK
9.0 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
MiniCountryman (F60)Facelift 2020Cooper D 2.0
96 hp/t
71 kW/t
10.5 kg/hp
4.8 L/100 km
49.0 mpg US
58.9 mpg UK
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoost
121 hp/t
90 kW/t
8.3 kg/hp
4.5 L/100 km
52.3 mpg US
62.8 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleMiniCountryman (F60)Facelift 2020Cooper D 2.0FordPuma1.0 EcoBoost
Power
150 hp
112 kW
155 hp
116 kW
Torque
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
240 Nm
177 lb-ft
Acceleration
9.0 s
9.0 s
Top speed
211 km/h
131 mph
205 km/h
127 mph
Lightness
1,570 kg
3,461 lb
1,280 kg
2,822 lb
Fuel consumption
4.8 L/100 km
49.0 mpg US
58.9 mpg UK
4.5 L/100 km
52.3 mpg US
62.8 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
450 L
15.9 cu ft
Length
4,297 mm
169.2 in
Height
1,557 mm
61.3 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
456 L
16.1 cu ft
Length
4,207 mm
165.6 in
Height
1,536 mm
60.5 in
Range score
1,063 km
660 mi
-
CO2 score
127 g/km
-
Trunk score
450 L
15.9 cu ft
456 L
16.1 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
96 hp/t
71 kW/t
10.5 kg/hp
121 hp/t
90 kW/t
8.3 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleMini Countryman (F60) Facelift 2020 Cooper D 2.0Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost
Consumption4.8 L/100 km49 mpg US58.9 mpg UK4.5 L/100 km52.3 mpg US62.8 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km8.40 LC100 km7.88 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi13.52 LC100 mi12.67 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used720 L190 US gal158 UK gal675 L178 US gal148 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,260 LC/year1,181 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Mini Countryman (F60) Facelift 2020 Cooper D 2.0

  • Has 110 Nm more
  • Has 6 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Highest torque

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Smallest trunk

Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost

  • Has 5 hp more
  • Is 290 kg lighter
  • Uses 0.3 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 26 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 6 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper D 2.0
Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Cooper D 2.0
Cooper D 2.0
VS
MiniCountryman (F60)Facelift 2020Cooper D 2.0vsMiniCountryman (F60)Cooper D 2.0
1.0 EcoBoost
1.0 EcoBoost
VS
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoostvsFordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost
Cooper D 2.0
C 1.5
VS
MiniCountryman (F60)Facelift 2020Cooper D 2.0vsMiniCountryman (U25)C 1.5
1.0 EcoBoost
1.5 TSI
VS
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoostvsCupraFormentor1.5 TSI
Cooper D 2.0
Cooper S 1.6
VS
MiniCountryman (F60)Facelift 2020Cooper D 2.0vsMiniCountryman (R60)Facelift 2014Cooper S 1.6
1.0 EcoBoost
1.3 DIG-T
VS
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoostvsNissanQashqai III (J12)1.3 DIG-T
Cooper D 2.0
Cooper S 1.6
VS
MiniCountryman (F60)Facelift 2020Cooper D 2.0vsMiniCountryman (R60)Cooper S 1.6
1.0 EcoBoost
35 TDI
VS
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoostvsAUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202035 TDI
Cooper D 2.0
GLA 200d
VS
MiniCountryman (F60)Facelift 2020Cooper D 2.0vsMercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 200d
Cooper D 2.0
GLB 200d
VS
MiniCountryman (F60)Facelift 2020Cooper D 2.0vsMercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 200d
1.0 EcoBoost
1.5 TSI
VS
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoostvsVolkswagenT-Cross1.5 TSI
1.0 EcoBoost
Cooper D 2.0
VS
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoostvsMiniCountryman (F60)Facelift 2020Cooper D 2.0
Mini Countryman (F60) · Facelift 2020 Cooper D 2.0 vs Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost - car comparison - FastVsFaster