AUDI Q2L · Facelift 2021
Car comparison
AUDI Q2L · Facelift 2021 35 TFSIvsFord Puma 1.0 EcoBoost
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonFord Puma
1.0 EcoBoost
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost
- Quickest 0-100 km/h9.0 s
- Lightest1,280 kg2,822 lb
- Best power-to-weight121 hp/t90 kW/t8.3 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.5 L/100 km52.3 mpg US62.8 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.3 L/100 km44.4 mpg US53.3 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.0 L/100 km58.8 mpg US70.6 mpg UK
- Largest trunk456 L
- Best overall score54/100
- Best performance score42/100
- Best economy score95/100
- Best practicality score81/100
AUDI Q2L Facelift 2021 35 TFSI
- Fastest top speed210 km/h130 mph Unrestricted200 km/h124 mph Restricted
- Most powerful160 hp119 kW
- Highest torque250 Nm184 lb-ft
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIQ2LFacelift 202135 TFSI | FordPuma1.0 EcoBoost |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 160hp119kW | 155hp116kW |
| Torque | 250Nm184lb-ft | 240Nm177lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,425kg3,142lb | 1,280kg2,822lb |
| Gross weight | 1,875kg4,134lb | 1,765kg3,891lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Calculated | 205 km/h 127 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 87.9s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph Calculated | 80.2s99% target: 203 km/h / 126 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 9.2s | 9.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 54.6s Calculated | 62.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.7s Calculated | 8.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.3L/100 km37.6mpg US45.2mpg UK | 4.5L/100 km52.3mpg US62.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK | 5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK | 4L/100 km58.8mpg US70.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.7s Calculated | 16.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 112hp/t84kW/t51hp/1000 lb Calculated | 121hp/t90kW/t55hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 175Nm/t117lb-ft/ton Calculated | 188Nm/t125lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 800km497mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 1,498cc91cu in | 999cc61cu in |
| Length | 4,270mm168in | 4,207mm166in |
| Width | 1,785mm70in | 1,805mm71in |
| Height | 1,547mm61in | 1,536mm60in |
| Wheelbase | 2,628mm103in | 2,588mm102in |
| Front track | 1,543mm61in | - |
| Rear track | 1,545mm61in | - |
| Ground clearance | 142mm6in | 166mm7in |
| Trunk volume | 347L | 456L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,216L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 50L | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI Q2L Facelift 2021 35 TFSI: Power / Torque
- Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ2LFacelift 202135 TFSI | 5,500 rpm | 1,750-4,000 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| FordPuma1.0 EcoBoost | 6,000 rpm | 2,500 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIQ2LFacelift 202135 TFSI | FordPuma1.0 EcoBoost |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.7 s | 8.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 9.2 s | 9.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 54.6 s | 62.9 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Likely limited | 205 km/h 127 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.8 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.3 s | 7.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.9 s | 10.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 14.1 s | 13.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.7 s | 16.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 139 km/h 86 mph | 140 km/h 87 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ2LFacelift 202135 TFSI | 160 hp 119 kW |
| FordPuma1.0 EcoBoost | 155 hp 116 kW |
AUDI Q2L Facelift 2021 35 TFSI has 5 hp more than Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost.
The biggest power difference is between Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost and AUDI Q2L Facelift 2021 35 TFSI: 5 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ2LFacelift 202135 TFSI | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft |
| FordPuma1.0 EcoBoost | 240 Nm 177 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ2LFacelift 202135 TFSI | 1,425 kg 3,142 lb |
| FordPuma1.0 EcoBoost | 1,280 kg 2,822 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ2LFacelift 202135 TFSI | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
| FordPuma1.0 EcoBoost | 205 km/h 127 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ2LFacelift 202135 TFSI | 9.2 s |
| FordPuma1.0 EcoBoost | 9.0 s |
Although AUDI Q2L Facelift 2021 35 TFSI has more power, Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost and AUDI Q2L Facelift 2021 35 TFSI: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ2LFacelift 202135 TFSI | 6.3 L/100 km 37.6 mpg US 45.2 mpg UK |
| FordPuma1.0 EcoBoost | 4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost and AUDI Q2L Facelift 2021 35 TFSI: 1.8 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ2LFacelift 202135 TFSI | 112 hp/t 84 kW/t 8.9 kg/hp |
| FordPuma1.0 EcoBoost | 121 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ2LFacelift 202135 TFSI | 160 hp 119 kW | 9.2 s | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
| FordPuma1.0 EcoBoost | 155 hp 116 kW | 9.0 s | 205 km/h 127 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ2LFacelift 202135 TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| FordPuma1.0 EcoBoost |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ2LFacelift 202135 TFSI |
| 6.3 L/100 km 37.6 mpg US 45.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| FordPuma1.0 EcoBoost |
| 4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK | ||||||
Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ2LFacelift 202135 TFSI | 6.3 L/100 km 37.6 mpg US 45.2 mpg UK | 9.2 s |
| FordPuma1.0 EcoBoost | 4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK | 9.0 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ2LFacelift 202135 TFSI | 112 hp/t 84 kW/t 8.9 kg/hp | 6.3 L/100 km 37.6 mpg US 45.2 mpg UK |
| FordPuma1.0 EcoBoost | 121 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp | 4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIQ2LFacelift 202135 TFSI | FordPuma1.0 EcoBoost | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 160 hp 119 kW | 155 hp 116 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft | 240 Nm 177 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 9.2 s | 9.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph | 205 km/h 127 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,425 kg 3,142 lb | 1,280 kg 2,822 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.3 L/100 km 37.6 mpg US 45.2 mpg UK | 4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 800 km 497 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 347 L 12.3 cu ft | 456 L 16.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 112 hp/t 84 kW/t 8.9 kg/hp | 121 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI Q2L Facelift 2021 35 TFSI | Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.3 L/100 km37.6 mpg US45.2 mpg UK | 4.5 L/100 km52.3 mpg US62.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.94 LC100 km | 7.88 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 17.60 LC100 mi | 12.67 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 938 L248 US gal206 UK gal | 675 L178 US gal148 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,641 LC/year | 1,181 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI Q2L Facelift 2021 35 TFSI
- Has 5 hp more
- Has 10 Nm more
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost
- Is 145 kg lighter
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 1.8 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 9 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 109 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























