Ford Galaxy III
Car comparison
Ford Galaxy III 2.0 EcoBoostvsFord S-MAX · Facelift 2010 2.2 Duratorq TDCi
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonFord S-MAX · Facelift 2010
2.2 Duratorq TDCi
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Ford Galaxy III 2.0 EcoBoost
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.6 s
- Fastest top speed222 km/h138 mph
- Most powerful240 hp179 kW
- Lightest1,658 kg3,655 lb
- Best power-to-weight145 hp/t108 kW/t6.9 kg/hp
- Largest trunk300 L
- Best overall score59/100
- Best performance score49/100
- Best practicality score81/100
Ford S-MAX Facelift 2010 2.2 Duratorq TDCi
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.6 L/100 km35.6 mpg US42.8 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption8.2 L/100 km28.7 mpg US34.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.7 L/100 km41.3 mpg US49.6 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,061 km659 mi
- Best economy score89/100
Specification comparison
| Model | FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoost | FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.2 Duratorq TDCi |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 240hp179kW | 200hp149kW |
| Torque | 345Nm254lb-ft | - |
| Curb weight | 1,658kg3,655lb | 1,734kg3,823lb |
| Gross weight | 2,585kg5,699lb | 2,505kg5,523lb |
| Top speed | 222 km/h 138 mph | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 98.7s99% target: 220 km/h / 137 mph Calculated | 105.7s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.6s | 8.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 43.3s Calculated | 53.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.1s Calculated | 8.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK | 6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 10.3L/100 km22.8mpg US27.4mpg UK | 8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK | 5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.2s Calculated | 16.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 145hp/t108kW/t66hp/1000 lb Calculated | 115hp/t86kW/t52hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 208Nm/t139lb-ft/ton Calculated | - |
| Estimated range | 886km551mi Calculated | 1,061km659mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,999cc122cu in | - |
| Length | 4,848mm191in | 4,903mm193in |
| Width | 1,916mm75in | 2,154mm85in |
| Height | 1,747mm69in | 1,660mm65in |
| Wheelbase | 2,849mm112in | - |
| Front track | 1,606mm63in | - |
| Rear track | 1,606mm63in | - |
| Ground clearance | 124mm5in | - |
| Trunk volume | 300L | 285L |
| Max trunk volume | 2,339L | 2,000L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 7 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 70L |
| CO2 emissions | 180g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoost | FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.2 Duratorq TDCi |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.1 s | 8.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.6 s | 8.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 43.3 s | 53.1 s |
| Top speed | 222 km/h 138 mph | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.0 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.6 s | 10.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.7 s | 13.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.2 s | 16.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 142 km/h 88 mph | 139 km/h 86 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoost | 240 hp 179 kW |
| FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.2 Duratorq TDCi | 200 hp 149 kW |
Ford Galaxy III 2.0 EcoBoost has 40 hp more than Ford S-MAX Facelift 2010 2.2 Duratorq TDCi.
The biggest power difference is between Ford S-MAX Facelift 2010 2.2 Duratorq TDCi and Ford Galaxy III 2.0 EcoBoost: 40 hp (30 kW).
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoost | 1,658 kg 3,655 lb |
| FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.2 Duratorq TDCi | 1,734 kg 3,823 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoost | 222 km/h 138 mph |
| FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.2 Duratorq TDCi | 215 km/h 134 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoost | 8.6 s |
| FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.2 Duratorq TDCi | 8.6 s |
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoost | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK |
| FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.2 Duratorq TDCi | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Ford S-MAX Facelift 2010 2.2 Duratorq TDCi and Ford Galaxy III 2.0 EcoBoost: 1.3 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoost | 145 hp/t 108 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp |
| FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.2 Duratorq TDCi | 115 hp/t 86 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoost | 886 km 551 mi |
| FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.2 Duratorq TDCi | 1,061 km 659 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoost | 240 hp 179 kW | 8.6 s | 222 km/h 138 mph |
| FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.2 Duratorq TDCi | 200 hp 149 kW | 8.6 s | 215 km/h 134 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoost |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.2 Duratorq TDCi |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoost |
| 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.2 Duratorq TDCi |
| 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | ||||||
Ford Galaxy III 2.0 EcoBoost is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoost | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | 8.6 s |
| FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.2 Duratorq TDCi | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | 8.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoost | 145 hp/t 108 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK |
| FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.2 Duratorq TDCi | 115 hp/t 86 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoost | FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.2 Duratorq TDCi | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 240 hp 179 kW | 200 hp 149 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 345 Nm 254 lb-ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.6 s | 8.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 222 km/h 138 mph | 215 km/h 134 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,658 kg 3,655 lb | 1,734 kg 3,823 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 886 km 551 mi | 1,061 km 659 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 180 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 300 L 10.6 cu ft | 285 L 10.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 145 hp/t 108 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp | 115 hp/t 86 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Ford Galaxy III 2.0 EcoBoost | Ford S-MAX Facelift 2010 2.2 Duratorq TDCi |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.9 L/100 km29.8 mpg US35.8 mpg UK | 6.6 L/100 km35.6 mpg US42.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.83 LC100 km | 11.55 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 22.25 LC100 mi | 18.59 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,185 L313 US gal261 UK gal | 990 L262 US gal218 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,074 LC/year | 1,733 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Ford Galaxy III 2.0 EcoBoost
- Has 40 hp more
- Is 76 kg lighter
- Has 7 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
- Has 29 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 15 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
Ford S-MAX Facelift 2010 2.2 Duratorq TDCi
- Uses 1.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 175 km (108 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























