Car comparison

Jaguar XJ220 3.5 BiTurbo V6vsFerrari 512 TR 4.9 i V12 48V

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Jaguar XJ220

3.5 BiTurbo V6

542 hp3498 ccGasolineRWDManualTwin-turboCoupe1992-1994

Ferrari 512 TR

4.9 i V12 48V

428 hp4943 ccGasolineRWDManualNaturally aspiratedCoupe1992-1994

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Jaguar XJ220 3.5 BiTurbo V6

Quickest 0-100 km/h
3.8 s
Fastest top speed
342 km/h
213 mph
Most powerful
542 hp
404 kW
Highest torque
640 Nm
472 lb-ft
Lightest
1,350 kg
2,976 lb
Best power-to-weight
401 hp/t
299 kW/t
2.5 kg/hp
Best overall score
74/100
Best performance score
91/100
Best practicality score
39/100

Ferrari 512 TR 4.9 i V12 48V

Best economy score
75/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
Model	JaguarXJ2203.5 BiTurbo V6	Ferrari512 TR4.9 i V12 48V
Power	542hp404kW	428hp319kW
Torque	640Nm472lb-ft	491Nm362lb-ft
Curb weight	1,350kg2,976lb	1,590kg3,505lb
Top speed	342 km/h 213 mph	314 km/h 195 mph
To 99% top speed	53.9s99% target: 339 km/h / 210 mph Calculated	74.1s99% target: 311 km/h / 193 mph Calculated
0-100 km/h	3.8s	4.8s
0-200 km/h	9.9s Calculated	14.0s Calculated
0-60 mph	3.6s Calculated	4.6s Calculated
Fuel consumption	-	11.8L/100 km19.9mpg US23.9mpg UK
Fuel consumption city	-	25.1L/100 km9.4mpg US11.3mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway	-	10L/100 km23.5mpg US28.2mpg UK
Quarter mile	11.3s Calculated	12.7s Calculated
Power-to-weight	401hp/t299kW/t182hp/1000 lb Calculated	269hp/t201kW/t122hp/1000 lb Calculated
Torque-to-weight	474Nm/t317lb-ft/ton Calculated	309Nm/t207lb-ft/ton Calculated
Estimated range	-	847km527mi Calculated
Displacement	3,498cc213cu in	4,943cc302cu in
Length	4,930mm194in	4,480mm176in
Width	2,000mm79in	1,975mm78in
Height	1,150mm45in	1,135mm45in
Wheelbase	2,640mm104in	2,550mm100in
Front track	-	1,530mm60in
Rear track	-	1,645mm65in
Doors	2	2
Seats	2	2
Fuel tank	-	100L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Jaguar XJ220 3.5 BiTurbo V6Ferrari 512 TR 4.9 i V12 48VPowerTorque

Dyno simulation data table
Vehicle	Peak power RPM	Peak torque RPM	Max engine speed
JaguarXJ2203.5 BiTurbo V6	7,200 rpm	4,500 rpm	7,450 rpm
Ferrari512 TR4.9 i V12 48V	6,750 rpm	5,500 rpm	7,000 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
Metric	JaguarXJ2203.5 BiTurbo V6	Ferrari512 TR4.9 i V12 48V
	Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h	3.6 s	4.6 s
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph	3.8 s	4.8 s
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph	9.9 s	14.0 s
0-200 mph 0-322 km/h	32.8 s	-
Top speed	342 km/h 213 mph	314 km/h 195 mph
	Drag race simulation
60 ft 18 m	2.1 s	2.2 s
330 ft 101 m	5.2 s	5.7 s
1/8 mile 201 m	7.6 s	8.4 s
1000 ft 305 m	9.7 s	10.8 s
1/4 mile 402 m	11.3 s	12.7 s
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m	217 km/h 135 mph	190 km/h 118 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
JaguarXJ2203.5 BiTurbo V6	542 hp 404 kW
Ferrari512 TR4.9 i V12 48V	428 hp 319 kW

Jaguar XJ220 3.5 BiTurbo V6 has 114 hp more than Ferrari 512 TR 4.9 i V12 48V.

The biggest power difference is between Ferrari 512 TR 4.9 i V12 48V and Jaguar XJ220 3.5 BiTurbo V6: 114 hp (85 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
JaguarXJ2203.5 BiTurbo V6	640 Nm 472 lb-ft
Ferrari512 TR4.9 i V12 48V	491 Nm 362 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
JaguarXJ2203.5 BiTurbo V6	1,350 kg 2,976 lb
Ferrari512 TR4.9 i V12 48V	1,590 kg 3,505 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
JaguarXJ2203.5 BiTurbo V6	342 km/h 213 mph
Ferrari512 TR4.9 i V12 48V	314 km/h 195 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
JaguarXJ2203.5 BiTurbo V6	3.8 s
Ferrari512 TR4.9 i V12 48V	4.8 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Jaguar XJ220 3.5 BiTurbo V6 and Ferrari 512 TR 4.9 i V12 48V: 1.0 s.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
JaguarXJ2203.5 BiTurbo V6	401 hp/t 299 kW/t 2.5 kg/hp
Ferrari512 TR4.9 i V12 48V	269 hp/t 201 kW/t 3.7 kg/hp

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
Vehicle	Power	Acceleration	Top speed
JaguarXJ2203.5 BiTurbo V6	542 hp 404 kW	3.8 s	342 km/h 213 mph
Ferrari512 TR4.9 i V12 48V	428 hp 319 kW	4.8 s	314 km/h 195 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Vehicle

Performance score

Practicality score

JaguarXJ2203.5 BiTurbo V6

Power	542 hp 404 kW
0-100 km/h	3.8 s
Top speed 342 km/h 213 mph

Doors/seats	2 doors 2 seats
Trunk	-
Length	4,930 mm 194.1 in
Height	1,150 mm 45.3 in

Ferrari512 TR4.9 i V12 48V

Power	428 hp 319 kW
0-100 km/h	4.8 s
Top speed 314 km/h 195 mph

Doors/seats	2 doors 2 seats
Trunk	-
Length	4,480 mm 176.4 in
Height	1,135 mm 44.7 in

Detailed score breakdown

Vehicle

JaguarXJ2203.5 BiTurbo V6

Ferrari512 TR4.9 i V12 48V

Power

542 hp

404 kW

428 hp

319 kW

Torque

640 Nm

472 lb-ft

491 Nm

362 lb-ft

Acceleration

3.8 s

4.8 s

Top speed

342 km/h

213 mph

314 km/h

195 mph

Lightness

1,350 kg

2,976 lb

1,590 kg

3,505 lb

Fuel consumption

11.8 L/100 km

19.9 mpg US

23.9 mpg UK

Practicality

Doors/seats	2 doors 2 seats
Trunk	-
Length	4,930 mm 194.1 in
Height	1,150 mm 45.3 in

Doors/seats	2 doors 2 seats
Trunk	-
Length	4,480 mm 176.4 in
Height	1,135 mm 44.7 in

Range score

847 km

527 mi

Power-to-weight score

401 hp/t

299 kW/t

2.5 kg/hp

269 hp/t

201 kW/t

3.7 kg/hp

Overall

Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Average annual distanceDistance unitFuel price in your local currencyPrice unit

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
Vehicle	Ferrari 512 TR 4.9 i V12 48V
Consumption	11.8 L/100 km19.9 mpg US23.9 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km	20.65 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi	33.23 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used	1,770 L468 US gal389 UK gal
Annual fuel cost	3,098 LC/year