Ferrari 550 Maranello
Car comparison
Ferrari 550 Maranello 5.5 V12vsFerrari 512 TR 4.9 i V12 48V
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonFerrari 512 TR
4.9 i V12 48V
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Ferrari 550 Maranello 5.5 V12
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.4 s
- Fastest top speed330 km/h205 mph Unrestricted320 km/h199 mph Restricted
- Most powerful485 hp362 kW
- Highest torque569 Nm420 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight287 hp/t214 kW/t3.5 kg/hp
- Best overall score69/100
- Best performance score86/100
Ferrari 512 TR 4.9 i V12 48V
- Lightest1,590 kg3,505 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption11.8 L/100 km19.9 mpg US23.9 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption25.1 L/100 km9.4 mpg US11.3 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption10.0 L/100 km23.5 mpg US28.2 mpg UK
- Best estimated range847 km527 mi
- Best economy score75/100
- Best practicality score38/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Ferrari550 Maranello5.5 V12 | Ferrari512 TR4.9 i V12 48V |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 485hp362kW | 428hp319kW |
| Torque | 569Nm420lb-ft | 491Nm362lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,690kg3,726lb | 1,590kg3,505lb |
| Gross weight | 1,950kg4,299lb | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 330 km/h205 mph Restricted 320 km/h199 mph Calculated | 314 km/h 195 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 73.3s99% target: 327 km/h / 203 mph Calculated | 74.7s99% target: 311 km/h / 193 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.4s | 4.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 12.5s Calculated | 14.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.2s Calculated | 4.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 24.4L/100 km9.6mpg US11.6mpg UK | 11.8L/100 km19.9mpg US23.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 38.2L/100 km6.2mpg US7.4mpg UK | 25.1L/100 km9.4mpg US11.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 16.4L/100 km14.3mpg US17.2mpg UK | 10L/100 km23.5mpg US28.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.2s Calculated | 12.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 287hp/t214kW/t130hp/1000 lb Calculated | 269hp/t201kW/t122hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 337Nm/t225lb-ft/ton Calculated | 309Nm/t207lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 467km290mi Calculated | 847km527mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 5,474cc334cu in | 4,943cc302cu in |
| Length | 4,550mm179in | 4,480mm176in |
| Width | 1,935mm76in | 1,975mm78in |
| Height | 1,277mm50in | 1,135mm45in |
| Wheelbase | 2,500mm98in | 2,550mm100in |
| Front track | 1,632mm64in | 1,530mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,586mm62in | 1,645mm65in |
| Ground clearance | 135mm5in | - |
| Trunk volume | 185L | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 114L | 100L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Ferrari 550 Maranello 5.5 V12: Power / Torque
- Ferrari 512 TR 4.9 i V12 48V: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ferrari550 Maranello5.5 V12 | 7,000 rpm | 5,000 rpm | 7,500 rpm |
| Ferrari512 TR4.9 i V12 48V | 6,750 rpm | 5,500 rpm | 7,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Ferrari550 Maranello5.5 V12 | Ferrari512 TR4.9 i V12 48V |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.2 s | 4.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.4 s | 4.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 12.5 s | 14.0 s |
0-200 mph 0-322 km/h | 57.6 s | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 330 km/h205 mph Restricted 320 km/h199 mph Likely limited | 314 km/h 195 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.5 s | 5.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.1 s | 8.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.4 s | 10.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.2 s | 12.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 197 km/h 123 mph | 190 km/h 118 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Ferrari550 Maranello5.5 V12 | 485 hp 362 kW |
| Ferrari512 TR4.9 i V12 48V | 428 hp 319 kW |
Ferrari 550 Maranello 5.5 V12 has 57 hp more than Ferrari 512 TR 4.9 i V12 48V.
The biggest power difference is between Ferrari 512 TR 4.9 i V12 48V and Ferrari 550 Maranello 5.5 V12: 57 hp (43 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Ferrari550 Maranello5.5 V12 | 569 Nm 420 lb-ft |
| Ferrari512 TR4.9 i V12 48V | 491 Nm 362 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Ferrari550 Maranello5.5 V12 | 1,690 kg 3,726 lb |
| Ferrari512 TR4.9 i V12 48V | 1,590 kg 3,505 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Ferrari550 Maranello5.5 V12 | Unrestricted 330 km/h205 mph Restricted 320 km/h199 mph |
| Ferrari512 TR4.9 i V12 48V | 314 km/h 195 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Ferrari550 Maranello5.5 V12 | 4.4 s |
| Ferrari512 TR4.9 i V12 48V | 4.8 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Ferrari 550 Maranello 5.5 V12 and Ferrari 512 TR 4.9 i V12 48V: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Ferrari550 Maranello5.5 V12 | 24.4 L/100 km 9.6 mpg US 11.6 mpg UK |
| Ferrari512 TR4.9 i V12 48V | 11.8 L/100 km 19.9 mpg US 23.9 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Ferrari 512 TR 4.9 i V12 48V and Ferrari 550 Maranello 5.5 V12: 12.6 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Ferrari550 Maranello5.5 V12 | 287 hp/t 214 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp |
| Ferrari512 TR4.9 i V12 48V | 269 hp/t 201 kW/t 3.7 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Ferrari550 Maranello5.5 V12 | 467 km 290 mi |
| Ferrari512 TR4.9 i V12 48V | 847 km 527 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ferrari550 Maranello5.5 V12 | 485 hp 362 kW | 4.4 s | Unrestricted 330 km/h205 mph Restricted 320 km/h199 mph |
| Ferrari512 TR4.9 i V12 48V | 428 hp 319 kW | 4.8 s | 314 km/h 195 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ferrari550 Maranello5.5 V12 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Ferrari512 TR4.9 i V12 48V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ferrari550 Maranello5.5 V12 |
| 24.4 L/100 km 9.6 mpg US 11.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| Ferrari512 TR4.9 i V12 48V |
| 11.8 L/100 km 19.9 mpg US 23.9 mpg UK | ||||||
Ferrari 512 TR 4.9 i V12 48V is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Ferrari550 Maranello5.5 V12 | 24.4 L/100 km 9.6 mpg US 11.6 mpg UK | 4.4 s |
| Ferrari512 TR4.9 i V12 48V | 11.8 L/100 km 19.9 mpg US 23.9 mpg UK | 4.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Ferrari550 Maranello5.5 V12 | 287 hp/t 214 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp | 24.4 L/100 km 9.6 mpg US 11.6 mpg UK |
| Ferrari512 TR4.9 i V12 48V | 269 hp/t 201 kW/t 3.7 kg/hp | 11.8 L/100 km 19.9 mpg US 23.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Ferrari550 Maranello5.5 V12 | Ferrari512 TR4.9 i V12 48V | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 485 hp 362 kW | 428 hp 319 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 569 Nm 420 lb-ft | 491 Nm 362 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.4 s | 4.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 330 km/h205 mph Restricted 320 km/h199 mph | 314 km/h 195 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,690 kg 3,726 lb | 1,590 kg 3,505 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 24.4 L/100 km 9.6 mpg US 11.6 mpg UK | 11.8 L/100 km 19.9 mpg US 23.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 467 km 290 mi | 847 km 527 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 185 L 6.5 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 287 hp/t 214 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp | 269 hp/t 201 kW/t 3.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Ferrari 550 Maranello 5.5 V12 | Ferrari 512 TR 4.9 i V12 48V |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 24.4 L/100 km9.6 mpg US11.6 mpg UK | 11.8 L/100 km19.9 mpg US23.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 42.70 LC100 km | 20.65 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 68.72 LC100 mi | 33.23 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 3,660 L967 US gal805 UK gal | 1,770 L468 US gal389 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 6,405 LC/year | 3,098 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Ferrari 550 Maranello 5.5 V12
- Has 57 hp more
- Has 78 Nm more
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 16 km/h (10 mph) higher top speed
- Has 18 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Ferrari 512 TR 4.9 i V12 48V
- Is 100 kg lighter
- Uses 12.6 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 380 km (236 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























