Car comparison

Jaguar XJ220 3.5 BiTurbo V6vsFerrari F40 2.9 i V8 32V

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Jaguar XJ220

3.5 BiTurbo V6

542 hp3498 ccGasolineRWDManualTwin-turboCoupe1992-1994
VS

Ferrari F40

2.9 i V8 32V

478 hp2936 ccGasolineRWDManualTwin-turboCoupe1987-1992

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Jaguar XJ220 3.5 BiTurbo V6

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    3.8 s
  • Fastest top speed
    342 km/h
    213 mph
  • Most powerful
    542 hp
    404 kW
  • Highest torque
    640 Nm
    472 lb-ft
  • Best overall score
    74/100
  • Best performance score
    91/100
  • Best economy score
    0/100
  • Best practicality score
    39/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelJaguarXJ2203.5 BiTurbo V6FerrariF402.9 i V8 32V
Power
542hp404kW
478hp356kW
Torque
640Nm472lb-ft
577Nm426lb-ft
Curb weight
1,350kg2,976lb
1,100kg2,425lb
Gross weight-
1,400kg3,086lb
Top speed
342 km/h
213 mph
324 km/h
201 mph
To 99% top speed
53.9s99% target: 339 km/h / 210 mph
Calculated
51.5s99% target: 321 km/h / 199 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
3.8s
4.1s
0-200 km/h
9.9s
Calculated
10.7s
Calculated
0-60 mph
3.6s
Calculated
3.9s
Calculated
Fuel consumption city-
17.9L/100 km13.1mpg US15.8mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway-
10.5L/100 km22.4mpg US26.9mpg UK
Quarter mile
11.3s
Calculated
11.7s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
401hp/t299kW/t182hp/1000 lb
Calculated
435hp/t324kW/t197hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
474Nm/t317lb-ft/ton
Calculated
525Nm/t351lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Displacement
3,498cc213cu in
2,936cc179cu in
Length
4,930mm194in
4,358mm172in
Width
2,000mm79in
1,970mm78in
Height
1,150mm45in
1,124mm44in
Wheelbase
2,640mm104in
2,450mm96in
Front track-
1,594mm63in
Rear track-
1,606mm63in
Ground clearance-
125mm5in
Doors
2
2
Seats
2
2
Fuel tank-
120L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Jaguar XJ220 3.5 BiTurbo V6Ferrari F40 2.9 i V8 32VPowerTorque
  • Jaguar XJ220 3.5 BiTurbo V6: Power / Torque
  • Ferrari F40 2.9 i V8 32V: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
JaguarXJ2203.5 BiTurbo V67,200 rpm4,500 rpm7,450 rpm
FerrariF402.9 i V8 32V7,000 rpm4,000 rpm7,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricJaguarXJ2203.5 BiTurbo V6FerrariF402.9 i V8 32V
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
3.6 s
3.9 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
3.8 s
4.1 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
9.9 s
10.7 s
0-200 mph
0-322 km/h
32.8 s
56.2 s
Top speed
342 km/h
213 mph
324 km/h
201 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.1 s
2.2 s
330 ft
101 m
5.2 s
5.4 s
1/8 mile
201 m
7.6 s
7.9 s
1000 ft
305 m
9.7 s
10.0 s
1/4 mile
402 m
11.3 s
11.7 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
217 km/h
135 mph
211 km/h
131 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXJ2203.5 BiTurbo V6
542 hp
404 kW
FerrariF402.9 i V8 32V
478 hp
356 kW

Jaguar XJ220 3.5 BiTurbo V6 has 64 hp more than Ferrari F40 2.9 i V8 32V.

The biggest power difference is between Ferrari F40 2.9 i V8 32V and Jaguar XJ220 3.5 BiTurbo V6: 64 hp (48 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXJ2203.5 BiTurbo V6
640 Nm
472 lb-ft
FerrariF402.9 i V8 32V
577 Nm
426 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXJ2203.5 BiTurbo V6
1,350 kg
2,976 lb
FerrariF402.9 i V8 32V
1,100 kg
2,425 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXJ2203.5 BiTurbo V6
342 km/h
213 mph
FerrariF402.9 i V8 32V
324 km/h
201 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXJ2203.5 BiTurbo V63.8 s
FerrariF402.9 i V8 32V4.1 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Jaguar XJ220 3.5 BiTurbo V6 and Ferrari F40 2.9 i V8 32V: 0.3 s.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXJ2203.5 BiTurbo V6
401 hp/t
299 kW/t
2.5 kg/hp
FerrariF402.9 i V8 32V
435 hp/t
324 kW/t
2.3 kg/hp

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
JaguarXJ2203.5 BiTurbo V6
542 hp
404 kW
3.8 s
342 km/h
213 mph
FerrariF402.9 i V8 32V
478 hp
356 kW
4.1 s
324 km/h
201 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
JaguarXJ2203.5 BiTurbo V6
Power
542 hp
404 kW
0-100 km/h3.8 s
Top speed
342 km/h
213 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,930 mm
194.1 in
Height
1,150 mm
45.3 in
FerrariF402.9 i V8 32V
Power
478 hp
356 kW
0-100 km/h4.1 s
Top speed
324 km/h
201 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,358 mm
171.6 in
Height
1,124 mm
44.3 in

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleJaguarXJ2203.5 BiTurbo V6FerrariF402.9 i V8 32V
Power
542 hp
404 kW
478 hp
356 kW
Torque
640 Nm
472 lb-ft
577 Nm
426 lb-ft
Acceleration
3.8 s
4.1 s
Top speed
342 km/h
213 mph
324 km/h
201 mph
Lightness
1,350 kg
2,976 lb
1,100 kg
2,425 lb
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,930 mm
194.1 in
Height
1,150 mm
45.3 in
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,358 mm
171.6 in
Height
1,124 mm
44.3 in
Power-to-weight score
401 hp/t
299 kW/t
2.5 kg/hp
435 hp/t
324 kW/t
2.3 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Head-to-head comparisons

Jaguar XJ220 3.5 BiTurbo V6

  • Has 64 hp more
  • Has 63 Nm more
  • Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 18 km/h (11 mph) higher top speed

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque

Cons

  • Heaviest

Ferrari F40 2.9 i V8 32V

  • Is 250 kg lighter
  • Has 33 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Jaguar XJ220 3.5 BiTurbo V6
Ferrari F40 2.9 i V8 32V
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

3.5 BiTurbo V6
6.0 V12
VS
JaguarXJ2203.5 BiTurbo V6vsLamborghiniDiablo6.0 V12
2.9 i V8 32V
4.9 i V12 48V
VS
FerrariF402.9 i V8 32VvsFerrari512 TR4.9 i V12 48V
3.5 BiTurbo V6
SVR 5.0 V8
VS
JaguarXJ2203.5 BiTurbo V6vsJaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 2017SVR 5.0 V8
2.9 i V8 32V
2.9 V8
VS
FerrariF402.9 i V8 32VvsFerrari288 GTO2.9 V8
3.5 BiTurbo V6
SVR 5.0 V8
VS
JaguarXJ2203.5 BiTurbo V6vsJaguarF-type CoupeSVR 5.0 V8
2.9 i V8 32V
5.5 V12
VS
FerrariF402.9 i V8 32VvsFerrari550 Maranello5.5 V12
3.5 BiTurbo V6
7.3 i V12 48V
VS
JaguarXJ2203.5 BiTurbo V6vsPaganiZonda C127.3 i V12 48V
2.9 i V8 32V
GT 5.5 V12
VS
FerrariF402.9 i V8 32VvsFerrari456GT 5.5 V12
3.5 BiTurbo V6
5.3 i V8 32V
VS
JaguarXJ2203.5 BiTurbo V6vsAston MartinV8 Vantage (II)5.3 i V8 32V
2.9 i V8 32V
4.3 V8
VS
FerrariF402.9 i V8 32VvsFerrariF430 Challenge4.3 V8
3.5 BiTurbo V6
R-S 5.0 V8
VS
JaguarXJ2203.5 BiTurbo V6vsJaguarXK Coupe (X150)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8
2.9 i V8 32V
2.8
VS
FerrariF402.9 i V8 32VvsPorsche9592.8
Jaguar XJ220 3.5 BiTurbo V6 vs Ferrari F40 2.9 i V8 32V - car comparison - FastVsFaster