Car comparison

Jaguar XJ220 3.5 BiTurbo V6vsJaguar XK Coupe (X150) · Facelift 2011 R-S 5.0 V8

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Jaguar XJ220

3.5 BiTurbo V6

542 hp3498 ccGasolineRWDManualTwin-turboCoupe1992-1994
VS

Jaguar XK Coupe (X150) · Facelift 2011

R-S 5.0 V8

550 hp5000 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticSuperchargedCoupe2011-2014

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Jaguar XJ220 3.5 BiTurbo V6

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    3.8 s
  • Fastest top speed
    342 km/h
    213 mph
  • Lightest
    1,350 kg
    2,976 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    401 hp/t
    299 kW/t
    2.5 kg/hp
  • Best performance score
    91/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelJaguarXJ2203.5 BiTurbo V6JaguarXK Coupe (X150)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8
Power
542hp404kW
550hp410kW
Torque
640Nm472lb-ft
680Nm502lb-ft
Curb weight
1,350kg2,976lb
1,753kg3,865lb
Gross weight-
2,145kg4,729lb
Top speed
342 km/h
213 mph
Unrestricted
315 km/h196 mph
Restricted
300 km/h186 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
53.9s99% target: 339 km/h / 210 mph
Calculated
66.1s99% target: 312 km/h / 194 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
3.8s
4.4s
0-200 km/h
9.9s
Calculated
12.6s
Calculated
0-60 mph
3.6s
Calculated
4.2s
Calculated
Fuel consumption-
12.3L/100 km19.1mpg US23.0mpg UK
Fuel consumption city-
18.9L/100 km12.4mpg US14.9mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway-
8.6L/100 km27.4mpg US32.8mpg UK
Quarter mile
11.3s
Calculated
12.2s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
401hp/t299kW/t182hp/1000 lb
Calculated
314hp/t234kW/t142hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
474Nm/t317lb-ft/ton
Calculated
388Nm/t260lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range-
574km357mi
Calculated
Displacement
3,498cc213cu in
5,000cc305cu in
Length
4,930mm194in
4,804mm189in
Width
2,000mm79in
1,892mm74in
Height
1,150mm45in
1,312mm52in
Wheelbase
2,640mm104in
2,752mm108in
Ground clearance-
100mm4in
Trunk volume-
330L
Doors
2
2
Seats
2
4
Fuel tank-
71L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Jaguar XJ220 3.5 BiTurbo V6Jaguar XK Coupe (X150) Facelift 2011 R-S 5.0 V8PowerTorque
  • Jaguar XJ220 3.5 BiTurbo V6: Power / Torque
  • Jaguar XK Coupe (X150) Facelift 2011 R-S 5.0 V8: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
JaguarXJ2203.5 BiTurbo V67,200 rpm4,500 rpm7,450 rpm
JaguarXK Coupe (X150)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V86,000-6,500 rpm2,500-5,500 rpm6,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricJaguarXJ2203.5 BiTurbo V6JaguarXK Coupe (X150)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
3.6 s
4.2 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
3.8 s
4.4 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
9.9 s
12.6 s
0-200 mph
0-322 km/h
32.8 s
-
Top speed
342 km/h
213 mph
Unrestricted
315 km/h196 mph
Restricted
300 km/h186 mph
Limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.1 s
2.2 s
330 ft
101 m
5.2 s
5.5 s
1/8 mile
201 m
7.6 s
8.1 s
1000 ft
305 m
9.7 s
10.4 s
1/4 mile
402 m
11.3 s
12.2 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
217 km/h
135 mph
197 km/h
122 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXJ2203.5 BiTurbo V6
542 hp
404 kW
JaguarXK Coupe (X150)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8
550 hp
410 kW

Jaguar XK Coupe (X150) Facelift 2011 R-S 5.0 V8 has 8 hp more than Jaguar XJ220 3.5 BiTurbo V6.

The biggest power difference is between Jaguar XJ220 3.5 BiTurbo V6 and Jaguar XK Coupe (X150) Facelift 2011 R-S 5.0 V8: 8 hp (6 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXJ2203.5 BiTurbo V6
640 Nm
472 lb-ft
JaguarXK Coupe (X150)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8
680 Nm
502 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXJ2203.5 BiTurbo V6
1,350 kg
2,976 lb
JaguarXK Coupe (X150)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8
1,753 kg
3,865 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXJ2203.5 BiTurbo V6
342 km/h
213 mph
JaguarXK Coupe (X150)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8
Unrestricted
315 km/h196 mph
Restricted
300 km/h186 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Although Jaguar XK Coupe (X150) Facelift 2011 R-S 5.0 V8 has more power, Jaguar XJ220 3.5 BiTurbo V6 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Jaguar XJ220 3.5 BiTurbo V6 and Jaguar XK Coupe (X150) Facelift 2011 R-S 5.0 V8: 0.6 s.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXJ2203.5 BiTurbo V6
401 hp/t
299 kW/t
2.5 kg/hp
JaguarXK Coupe (X150)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8
314 hp/t
234 kW/t
3.2 kg/hp

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
JaguarXJ2203.5 BiTurbo V6
542 hp
404 kW
3.8 s
342 km/h
213 mph
JaguarXK Coupe (X150)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8
550 hp
410 kW
4.4 s
Unrestricted
315 km/h196 mph
Restricted
300 km/h186 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
JaguarXJ2203.5 BiTurbo V6
Power
542 hp
404 kW
0-100 km/h3.8 s
Top speed
342 km/h
213 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,930 mm
194.1 in
Height
1,150 mm
45.3 in
JaguarXK Coupe (X150)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8
Power
550 hp
410 kW
0-100 km/h4.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
315 km/h196 mph
Restricted
300 km/h186 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
330 L
11.7 cu ft
Length
4,804 mm
189.1 in
Height
1,312 mm
51.7 in

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleJaguarXJ2203.5 BiTurbo V6JaguarXK Coupe (X150)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8
Power
542 hp
404 kW
550 hp
410 kW
Torque
640 Nm
472 lb-ft
680 Nm
502 lb-ft
Acceleration
3.8 s
4.4 s
Top speed
342 km/h
213 mph
Unrestricted
315 km/h196 mph
Restricted
300 km/h186 mph
Lightness
1,350 kg
2,976 lb
1,753 kg
3,865 lb
Fuel consumption
-
12.3 L/100 km
19.1 mpg US
23.0 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,930 mm
194.1 in
Height
1,150 mm
45.3 in
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
330 L
11.7 cu ft
Length
4,804 mm
189.1 in
Height
1,312 mm
51.7 in
Range score
-
574 km
357 mi
Trunk score
-
330 L
11.7 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
401 hp/t
299 kW/t
2.5 kg/hp
314 hp/t
234 kW/t
3.2 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleJaguar XK Coupe (X150) Facelift 2011 R-S 5.0 V8
Consumption12.3 L/100 km19.1 mpg US23 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km21.53 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi34.64 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,845 L487 US gal406 UK gal
Annual fuel cost3,229 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Jaguar XJ220 3.5 BiTurbo V6

  • Is 403 kg lighter
  • Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 27 km/h (17 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 88 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Lowest power

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Jaguar XJ220 3.5 BiTurbo V6
Jaguar XK Coupe (X150) R-S 5.0 V8
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Jaguar XJ220 3.5 BiTurbo V6 vs Jaguar XK Coupe (X150) · Facelift 2011 R-S 5.0 V8 - car comparison - FastVsFaster