Jaguar XJ220
Car comparison
Jaguar XJ220 3.5 BiTurbo V6vsJaguar XK Coupe (X150) · Facelift 2011 R-S 5.0 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonJaguar XK Coupe (X150) · Facelift 2011
R-S 5.0 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Jaguar XJ220 3.5 BiTurbo V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.8 s
- Fastest top speed342 km/h213 mph
- Lightest1,350 kg2,976 lb
- Best power-to-weight401 hp/t299 kW/t2.5 kg/hp
- Best performance score91/100
Jaguar XK Coupe (X150) Facelift 2011 R-S 5.0 V8
- Most powerful550 hp410 kW
- Highest torque680 Nm502 lb-ft
- Best overall score75/100
- Best economy score74/100
- Best practicality score48/100
Specification comparison
| Model | JaguarXJ2203.5 BiTurbo V6 | JaguarXK Coupe (X150)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 542hp404kW | 550hp410kW |
| Torque | 640Nm472lb-ft | 680Nm502lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,350kg2,976lb | 1,753kg3,865lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,145kg4,729lb |
| Top speed | 342 km/h 213 mph | Unrestricted 315 km/h196 mph Restricted 300 km/h186 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 53.9s99% target: 339 km/h / 210 mph Calculated | 66.1s99% target: 312 km/h / 194 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.8s | 4.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 9.9s Calculated | 12.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.6s Calculated | 4.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 12.3L/100 km19.1mpg US23.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 18.9L/100 km12.4mpg US14.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 8.6L/100 km27.4mpg US32.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 11.3s Calculated | 12.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 401hp/t299kW/t182hp/1000 lb Calculated | 314hp/t234kW/t142hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 474Nm/t317lb-ft/ton Calculated | 388Nm/t260lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 574km357mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,498cc213cu in | 5,000cc305cu in |
| Length | 4,930mm194in | 4,804mm189in |
| Width | 2,000mm79in | 1,892mm74in |
| Height | 1,150mm45in | 1,312mm52in |
| Wheelbase | 2,640mm104in | 2,752mm108in |
| Ground clearance | - | 100mm4in |
| Trunk volume | - | 330L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | - | 71L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Jaguar XJ220 3.5 BiTurbo V6: Power / Torque
- Jaguar XK Coupe (X150) Facelift 2011 R-S 5.0 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXJ2203.5 BiTurbo V6 | 7,200 rpm | 4,500 rpm | 7,450 rpm |
| JaguarXK Coupe (X150)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8 | 6,000-6,500 rpm | 2,500-5,500 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | JaguarXJ2203.5 BiTurbo V6 | JaguarXK Coupe (X150)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.6 s | 4.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.8 s | 4.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 9.9 s | 12.6 s |
0-200 mph 0-322 km/h | 32.8 s | - |
| Top speed | 342 km/h 213 mph | Unrestricted 315 km/h196 mph Restricted 300 km/h186 mph Limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.2 s | 5.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.6 s | 8.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 9.7 s | 10.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 11.3 s | 12.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 217 km/h 135 mph | 197 km/h 122 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXJ2203.5 BiTurbo V6 | 542 hp 404 kW |
| JaguarXK Coupe (X150)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8 | 550 hp 410 kW |
Jaguar XK Coupe (X150) Facelift 2011 R-S 5.0 V8 has 8 hp more than Jaguar XJ220 3.5 BiTurbo V6.
The biggest power difference is between Jaguar XJ220 3.5 BiTurbo V6 and Jaguar XK Coupe (X150) Facelift 2011 R-S 5.0 V8: 8 hp (6 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXJ2203.5 BiTurbo V6 | 640 Nm 472 lb-ft |
| JaguarXK Coupe (X150)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8 | 680 Nm 502 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXJ2203.5 BiTurbo V6 | 1,350 kg 2,976 lb |
| JaguarXK Coupe (X150)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8 | 1,753 kg 3,865 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXJ2203.5 BiTurbo V6 | 342 km/h 213 mph |
| JaguarXK Coupe (X150)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8 | Unrestricted 315 km/h196 mph Restricted 300 km/h186 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXJ2203.5 BiTurbo V6 | 3.8 s |
| JaguarXK Coupe (X150)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8 | 4.4 s |
Although Jaguar XK Coupe (X150) Facelift 2011 R-S 5.0 V8 has more power, Jaguar XJ220 3.5 BiTurbo V6 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Jaguar XJ220 3.5 BiTurbo V6 and Jaguar XK Coupe (X150) Facelift 2011 R-S 5.0 V8: 0.6 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXJ2203.5 BiTurbo V6 | 401 hp/t 299 kW/t 2.5 kg/hp |
| JaguarXK Coupe (X150)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8 | 314 hp/t 234 kW/t 3.2 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXJ2203.5 BiTurbo V6 | 542 hp 404 kW | 3.8 s | 342 km/h 213 mph |
| JaguarXK Coupe (X150)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8 | 550 hp 410 kW | 4.4 s | Unrestricted 315 km/h196 mph Restricted 300 km/h186 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXJ2203.5 BiTurbo V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| JaguarXK Coupe (X150)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | JaguarXJ2203.5 BiTurbo V6 | JaguarXK Coupe (X150)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 542 hp 404 kW | 550 hp 410 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 640 Nm 472 lb-ft | 680 Nm 502 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.8 s | 4.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 342 km/h 213 mph | Unrestricted 315 km/h196 mph Restricted 300 km/h186 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,350 kg 2,976 lb | 1,753 kg 3,865 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 12.3 L/100 km 19.1 mpg US 23.0 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 574 km 357 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | - | 330 L 11.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 401 hp/t 299 kW/t 2.5 kg/hp | 314 hp/t 234 kW/t 3.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Jaguar XK Coupe (X150) Facelift 2011 R-S 5.0 V8 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 12.3 L/100 km19.1 mpg US23 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 21.53 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 34.64 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,845 L487 US gal406 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,229 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Jaguar XJ220 3.5 BiTurbo V6
- Is 403 kg lighter
- Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 27 km/h (17 mph) higher top speed
- Has 88 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
Jaguar XK Coupe (X150) Facelift 2011 R-S 5.0 V8
- Has 8 hp more
- Has 40 Nm more
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























