Jaguar XJ220
Car comparison
Jaguar XJ220 3.5 BiTurbo V6vsLamborghini Diablo 6.0 V12
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonLamborghini Diablo
6.0 V12
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Jaguar XJ220 3.5 BiTurbo V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.8 s
- Fastest top speed342 km/h213 mph
- Highest torque640 Nm472 lb-ft
- Lightest1,350 kg2,976 lb
- Best power-to-weight401 hp/t299 kW/t2.5 kg/hp
- Best overall score74/100
- Best performance score91/100
- Best practicality score39/100
Lamborghini Diablo 6.0 V12
- Most powerful550 hp410 kW
- Best economy score46/100
Specification comparison
| Model | JaguarXJ2203.5 BiTurbo V6 | LamborghiniDiablo6.0 V12 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 542hp404kW | 550hp410kW |
| Torque | 640Nm472lb-ft | 620Nm457lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,350kg2,976lb | 1,625kg3,583lb |
| Gross weight | - | 1,850kg4,079lb |
| Top speed | 342 km/h 213 mph | 330 km/h 205 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 53.9s99% target: 339 km/h / 210 mph Calculated | 57.3s99% target: 327 km/h / 203 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.8s | 3.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 9.9s Calculated | 10.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.6s Calculated | 3.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 22.9L/100 km10.3mpg US12.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 37.9L/100 km6.2mpg US7.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 17.3L/100 km13.6mpg US16.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 11.3s Calculated | 11.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 401hp/t299kW/t182hp/1000 lb Calculated | 338hp/t252kW/t154hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 474Nm/t317lb-ft/ton Calculated | 382Nm/t255lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 437km271mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,498cc213cu in | 5,992cc366cu in |
| Length | 4,930mm194in | 4,470mm176in |
| Width | 2,000mm79in | 2,040mm80in |
| Height | 1,150mm45in | 1,105mm44in |
| Wheelbase | 2,640mm104in | 2,650mm104in |
| Front track | - | 1,610mm63in |
| Rear track | - | 1,670mm66in |
| Trunk volume | - | 140L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | - | 100L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Jaguar XJ220 3.5 BiTurbo V6: Power / Torque
- Lamborghini Diablo 6.0 V12: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXJ2203.5 BiTurbo V6 | 7,200 rpm | 4,500 rpm | 7,450 rpm |
| LamborghiniDiablo6.0 V12 | 7,100 rpm | 5,500 rpm | 7,350 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | JaguarXJ2203.5 BiTurbo V6 | LamborghiniDiablo6.0 V12 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.6 s | 3.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.8 s | 3.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 9.9 s | 10.6 s |
0-200 mph 0-322 km/h | 32.8 s | 45.5 s |
| Top speed | 342 km/h 213 mph | 330 km/h 205 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.1 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.2 s | 5.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.6 s | 7.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 9.7 s | 9.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 11.3 s | 11.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 217 km/h 135 mph | 210 km/h 130 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXJ2203.5 BiTurbo V6 | 542 hp 404 kW |
| LamborghiniDiablo6.0 V12 | 550 hp 410 kW |
Lamborghini Diablo 6.0 V12 has 8 hp more than Jaguar XJ220 3.5 BiTurbo V6.
The biggest power difference is between Jaguar XJ220 3.5 BiTurbo V6 and Lamborghini Diablo 6.0 V12: 8 hp (6 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXJ2203.5 BiTurbo V6 | 640 Nm 472 lb-ft |
| LamborghiniDiablo6.0 V12 | 620 Nm 457 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXJ2203.5 BiTurbo V6 | 1,350 kg 2,976 lb |
| LamborghiniDiablo6.0 V12 | 1,625 kg 3,583 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXJ2203.5 BiTurbo V6 | 342 km/h 213 mph |
| LamborghiniDiablo6.0 V12 | 330 km/h 205 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXJ2203.5 BiTurbo V6 | 3.8 s |
| LamborghiniDiablo6.0 V12 | 3.9 s |
Although Lamborghini Diablo 6.0 V12 has more power, Jaguar XJ220 3.5 BiTurbo V6 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Jaguar XJ220 3.5 BiTurbo V6 and Lamborghini Diablo 6.0 V12: 0.1 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXJ2203.5 BiTurbo V6 | 401 hp/t 299 kW/t 2.5 kg/hp |
| LamborghiniDiablo6.0 V12 | 338 hp/t 252 kW/t 3.0 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXJ2203.5 BiTurbo V6 | 542 hp 404 kW | 3.8 s | 342 km/h 213 mph |
| LamborghiniDiablo6.0 V12 | 550 hp 410 kW | 3.9 s | 330 km/h 205 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXJ2203.5 BiTurbo V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| LamborghiniDiablo6.0 V12 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | JaguarXJ2203.5 BiTurbo V6 | LamborghiniDiablo6.0 V12 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 542 hp 404 kW | 550 hp 410 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 640 Nm 472 lb-ft | 620 Nm 457 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.8 s | 3.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 342 km/h 213 mph | 330 km/h 205 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,350 kg 2,976 lb | 1,625 kg 3,583 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 22.9 L/100 km 10.3 mpg US 12.3 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 437 km 271 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | - | 140 L 4.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 401 hp/t 299 kW/t 2.5 kg/hp | 338 hp/t 252 kW/t 3.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Lamborghini Diablo 6.0 V12 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 22.9 L/100 km10.3 mpg US12.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 40.07 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 64.49 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 3,435 L907 US gal756 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 6,011 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Jaguar XJ220 3.5 BiTurbo V6
- Has 20 Nm more
- Is 275 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 12 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
- Has 63 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
Lamborghini Diablo 6.0 V12
- Has 8 hp more
Pros
- Most powerful
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























