Ferrari 512 TR
Car comparison
Ferrari 512 TR 4.9 i V12 48VvsFerrari 456M GT 5.5 V12
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonFerrari 456M
GT 5.5 V12
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Ferrari 512 TR 4.9 i V12 48V
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.8 s
- Fastest top speed314 km/h195 mph
- Lightest1,590 kg3,505 lb
- Best power-to-weight269 hp/t201 kW/t3.7 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption11.8 L/100 km19.9 mpg US23.9 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption25.1 L/100 km9.4 mpg US11.3 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption10.0 L/100 km23.5 mpg US28.2 mpg UK
- Best estimated range847 km527 mi
- Best economy score75/100
Ferrari 456M GT 5.5 V12
- Most powerful442 hp330 kW
- Highest torque550 Nm406 lb-ft
- Best overall score70/100
- Best performance score81/100
- Best practicality score48/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Ferrari512 TR4.9 i V12 48V | Ferrari456MGT 5.5 V12 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 428hp319kW | 442hp330kW |
| Torque | 491Nm362lb-ft | 550Nm406lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,590kg3,505lb | 1,690kg3,726lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,100kg4,630lb |
| Top speed | 314 km/h 195 mph | Unrestricted 310 km/h193 mph Restricted 300 km/h186 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 74.1s99% target: 311 km/h / 193 mph Calculated | 82.4s99% target: 307 km/h / 191 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.8s | 5.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 14.0s Calculated | 15.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.6s Calculated | 5.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 11.8L/100 km19.9mpg US23.9mpg UK | 21.6L/100 km10.9mpg US13.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 25.1L/100 km9.4mpg US11.3mpg UK | 35.1L/100 km6.7mpg US8.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 10L/100 km23.5mpg US28.2mpg UK | 13.8L/100 km17mpg US20.5mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.7s Calculated | 13.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 269hp/t201kW/t122hp/1000 lb Calculated | 262hp/t195kW/t119hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 309Nm/t207lb-ft/ton Calculated | 325Nm/t218lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 847km527mi Calculated | 509km316mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 4,943cc302cu in | 5,474cc334cu in |
| Length | 4,480mm176in | 4,763mm188in |
| Width | 1,975mm78in | 1,920mm76in |
| Height | 1,135mm45in | 1,300mm51in |
| Wheelbase | 2,550mm100in | 2,600mm102in |
| Front track | 1,530mm60in | 1,585mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,645mm65in | 1,606mm63in |
| Ground clearance | - | 119mm5in |
| Trunk volume | - | 316L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 100L | 110L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 495g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Ferrari 512 TR 4.9 i V12 48V: Power / Torque
- Ferrari 456M GT 5.5 V12: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ferrari512 TR4.9 i V12 48V | 6,750 rpm | 5,500 rpm | 7,000 rpm |
| Ferrari456MGT 5.5 V12 | 6,250 rpm | 4,500 rpm | 6,500 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Ferrari512 TR4.9 i V12 48V | Ferrari456MGT 5.5 V12 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.6 s | 5.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.8 s | 5.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 14.0 s | 15.5 s |
| Top speed | 314 km/h 195 mph | Unrestricted 310 km/h193 mph Restricted 300 km/h186 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.7 s | 5.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.4 s | 8.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.8 s | 11.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.7 s | 13.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 190 km/h 118 mph | 183 km/h 114 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Ferrari512 TR4.9 i V12 48V | 428 hp 319 kW |
| Ferrari456MGT 5.5 V12 | 442 hp 330 kW |
Ferrari 456M GT 5.5 V12 has 14 hp more than Ferrari 512 TR 4.9 i V12 48V.
The biggest power difference is between Ferrari 512 TR 4.9 i V12 48V and Ferrari 456M GT 5.5 V12: 14 hp (10 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Ferrari512 TR4.9 i V12 48V | 491 Nm 362 lb-ft |
| Ferrari456MGT 5.5 V12 | 550 Nm 406 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Ferrari512 TR4.9 i V12 48V | 1,590 kg 3,505 lb |
| Ferrari456MGT 5.5 V12 | 1,690 kg 3,726 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Ferrari512 TR4.9 i V12 48V | 314 km/h 195 mph |
| Ferrari456MGT 5.5 V12 | Unrestricted 310 km/h193 mph Restricted 300 km/h186 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Ferrari512 TR4.9 i V12 48V | 4.8 s |
| Ferrari456MGT 5.5 V12 | 5.2 s |
Although Ferrari 456M GT 5.5 V12 has more power, Ferrari 512 TR 4.9 i V12 48V is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Ferrari 512 TR 4.9 i V12 48V and Ferrari 456M GT 5.5 V12: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Ferrari512 TR4.9 i V12 48V | 11.8 L/100 km 19.9 mpg US 23.9 mpg UK |
| Ferrari456MGT 5.5 V12 | 21.6 L/100 km 10.9 mpg US 13.1 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Ferrari 512 TR 4.9 i V12 48V and Ferrari 456M GT 5.5 V12: 9.8 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Ferrari512 TR4.9 i V12 48V | 269 hp/t 201 kW/t 3.7 kg/hp |
| Ferrari456MGT 5.5 V12 | 262 hp/t 195 kW/t 3.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Ferrari512 TR4.9 i V12 48V | 847 km 527 mi |
| Ferrari456MGT 5.5 V12 | 509 km 316 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ferrari512 TR4.9 i V12 48V | 428 hp 319 kW | 4.8 s | 314 km/h 195 mph |
| Ferrari456MGT 5.5 V12 | 442 hp 330 kW | 5.2 s | Unrestricted 310 km/h193 mph Restricted 300 km/h186 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ferrari512 TR4.9 i V12 48V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Ferrari456MGT 5.5 V12 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ferrari512 TR4.9 i V12 48V |
| 11.8 L/100 km 19.9 mpg US 23.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| Ferrari456MGT 5.5 V12 |
| 21.6 L/100 km 10.9 mpg US 13.1 mpg UK | ||||||
Ferrari 512 TR 4.9 i V12 48V is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Ferrari512 TR4.9 i V12 48V | 11.8 L/100 km 19.9 mpg US 23.9 mpg UK | 4.8 s |
| Ferrari456MGT 5.5 V12 | 21.6 L/100 km 10.9 mpg US 13.1 mpg UK | 5.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Ferrari512 TR4.9 i V12 48V | 269 hp/t 201 kW/t 3.7 kg/hp | 11.8 L/100 km 19.9 mpg US 23.9 mpg UK |
| Ferrari456MGT 5.5 V12 | 262 hp/t 195 kW/t 3.8 kg/hp | 21.6 L/100 km 10.9 mpg US 13.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Ferrari512 TR4.9 i V12 48V | Ferrari456MGT 5.5 V12 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 428 hp 319 kW | 442 hp 330 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 491 Nm 362 lb-ft | 550 Nm 406 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.8 s | 5.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 314 km/h 195 mph | Unrestricted 310 km/h193 mph Restricted 300 km/h186 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,590 kg 3,505 lb | 1,690 kg 3,726 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 11.8 L/100 km 19.9 mpg US 23.9 mpg UK | 21.6 L/100 km 10.9 mpg US 13.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 847 km 527 mi | 509 km 316 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 495 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | - | 316 L 11.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 269 hp/t 201 kW/t 3.7 kg/hp | 262 hp/t 195 kW/t 3.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Ferrari 512 TR 4.9 i V12 48V | Ferrari 456M GT 5.5 V12 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 11.8 L/100 km19.9 mpg US23.9 mpg UK | 21.6 L/100 km10.9 mpg US13.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 20.65 LC100 km | 37.80 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 33.23 LC100 mi | 60.83 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,770 L468 US gal389 UK gal | 3,240 L856 US gal713 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,098 LC/year | 5,670 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Ferrari 512 TR 4.9 i V12 48V
- Is 100 kg lighter
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 4 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 9.8 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 8 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 338 km (210 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
Ferrari 456M GT 5.5 V12
- Has 14 hp more
- Has 59 Nm more
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























