Car comparison

DS 7 Crossback 1.6 PureTechvsJaguar E-Pace 2.0 D240

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

DS 7 Crossback

1.6 PureTech

225 hp1598 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2017-2019
VS

Jaguar E-Pace

2.0 D240

240 hp1999 ccDieselAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2018-2020

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 D240

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.4 s
  • Most powerful
    240 hp
    179 kW
  • Highest torque
    500 Nm
    369 lb-ft
  • Largest trunk
    1,234 L
  • Best overall score
    66/100
  • Best performance score
    54/100
  • Best practicality score
    91/100

DS 7 Crossback 1.6 PureTech

  • Fastest top speed
    227 km/h
    141 mph
  • Lightest
    1,420 kg
    3,131 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    158 hp/t
    118 kW/t
    6.3 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    6.0 L/100 km
    39.2 mpg US
    47.1 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    137 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    1,033 km
    642 mi
  • Best economy score
    91/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelDS7 Crossback1.6 PureTechJaguarE-Pace2.0 D240
Power
225hp168kW
240hp179kW
Torque
300Nm221lb-ft
500Nm369lb-ft
Curb weight
1,420kg3,131lb
1,926kg4,246lb
Gross weight
2,045kg4,508lb
2,420kg5,335lb
Top speed
227 km/h
141 mph
224 km/h
139 mph
To 99% top speed
87.1s99% target: 225 km/h / 140 mph
Calculated
89.8s99% target: 222 km/h / 138 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
8.3s
7.4s
0-200 km/h
36.3s
Calculated
37.3s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.9s
Calculated
7.0s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK
6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK
Fuel consumption city-
7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway-
5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK
Quarter mile
16.0s
Calculated
15.4s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
158hp/t118kW/t72hp/1000 lb
Calculated
125hp/t93kW/t57hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
211Nm/t141lb-ft/ton
Calculated
260Nm/t174lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,033km642mi
Calculated
898km558mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,598cc98cu in
1,999cc122cu in
Length
4,573mm180in
4,395mm173in
Width
1,895mm75in
1,984mm78in
Height
1,620mm64in
1,649mm65in
Wheelbase
2,738mm108in
2,681mm106in
Front track-
1,635mm64in
Rear track-
1,634mm64in
Ground clearance-
204mm8in
Trunk volume
555L
1,234L
Max trunk volume
628L
2,577L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
62L
56L
CO2 emissions
137g/km
162g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

DS 7 Crossback 1.6 PureTechJaguar E-Pace 2.0 D240PowerTorque
  • DS 7 Crossback 1.6 PureTech: Power / Torque
  • Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 D240: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
DS7 Crossback1.6 PureTech5,500 rpm1,900 rpm5,750 rpm
JaguarE-Pace2.0 D2404,000 rpm1,500 rpm4,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricDS7 Crossback1.6 PureTechJaguarE-Pace2.0 D240
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.9 s
7.0 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
8.3 s
7.4 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
36.3 s
37.3 s
Top speed
227 km/h
141 mph
224 km/h
139 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.7 s
2.4 s
330 ft
101 m
7.0 s
6.6 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.5 s
10.0 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.5 s
12.9 s
1/4 mile
402 m
16.0 s
15.4 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
146 km/h
91 mph
148 km/h
92 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
DS7 Crossback1.6 PureTech
225 hp
168 kW
JaguarE-Pace2.0 D240
240 hp
179 kW

Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 D240 has 15 hp more than DS 7 Crossback 1.6 PureTech.

The biggest power difference is between DS 7 Crossback 1.6 PureTech and Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 D240: 15 hp (11 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
DS7 Crossback1.6 PureTech
300 Nm
221 lb-ft
JaguarE-Pace2.0 D240
500 Nm
369 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
DS7 Crossback1.6 PureTech
1,420 kg
3,131 lb
JaguarE-Pace2.0 D240
1,926 kg
4,246 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
DS7 Crossback1.6 PureTech
227 km/h
141 mph
JaguarE-Pace2.0 D240
224 km/h
139 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
DS7 Crossback1.6 PureTech8.3 s
JaguarE-Pace2.0 D2407.4 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 D240 and DS 7 Crossback 1.6 PureTech: 0.9 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
DS7 Crossback1.6 PureTech
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK
JaguarE-Pace2.0 D240
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
DS7 Crossback1.6 PureTech
158 hp/t
118 kW/t
6.3 kg/hp
JaguarE-Pace2.0 D240
125 hp/t
93 kW/t
8.0 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
DS7 Crossback1.6 PureTech
1,033 km
642 mi
JaguarE-Pace2.0 D240
898 km
558 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
DS7 Crossback1.6 PureTech
225 hp
168 kW
8.3 s
227 km/h
141 mph
JaguarE-Pace2.0 D240
240 hp
179 kW
7.4 s
224 km/h
139 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
DS7 Crossback1.6 PureTech
Power
225 hp
168 kW
0-100 km/h8.3 s
Top speed
227 km/h
141 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
555 L
19.6 cu ft
Length
4,573 mm
180.0 in
Height
1,620 mm
63.8 in
JaguarE-Pace2.0 D240
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h7.4 s
Top speed
224 km/h
139 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
1,234 L
43.6 cu ft
Length
4,395 mm
173.0 in
Height
1,649 mm
64.9 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
DS7 Crossback1.6 PureTech
Power
225 hp
168 kW
0-100 km/h8.3 s
Top speed
227 km/h
141 mph
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK
JaguarE-Pace2.0 D240
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h7.4 s
Top speed
224 km/h
139 mph
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK

Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 D240 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
DS7 Crossback1.6 PureTech
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK
8.3 s
JaguarE-Pace2.0 D240
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK
7.4 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
DS7 Crossback1.6 PureTech
158 hp/t
118 kW/t
6.3 kg/hp
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK
JaguarE-Pace2.0 D240
125 hp/t
93 kW/t
8.0 kg/hp
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleDS7 Crossback1.6 PureTechJaguarE-Pace2.0 D240
Power
225 hp
168 kW
240 hp
179 kW
Torque
300 Nm
221 lb-ft
500 Nm
369 lb-ft
Acceleration
8.3 s
7.4 s
Top speed
227 km/h
141 mph
224 km/h
139 mph
Lightness
1,420 kg
3,131 lb
1,926 kg
4,246 lb
Fuel consumption
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
555 L
19.6 cu ft
Length
4,573 mm
180.0 in
Height
1,620 mm
63.8 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
1,234 L
43.6 cu ft
Length
4,395 mm
173.0 in
Height
1,649 mm
64.9 in
Range score
1,033 km
642 mi
898 km
558 mi
CO2 score
137 g/km
162 g/km
Trunk score
555 L
19.6 cu ft
1,234 L
43.6 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
158 hp/t
118 kW/t
6.3 kg/hp
125 hp/t
93 kW/t
8.0 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleDS 7 Crossback 1.6 PureTechJaguar E-Pace 2.0 D240
Consumption6 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km10.50 LC100 km10.85 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi16.90 LC100 mi17.46 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used900 L238 US gal198 UK gal930 L246 US gal205 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,575 LC/year1,628 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

DS 7 Crossback 1.6 PureTech

  • Is 506 kg lighter
  • Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 0.2 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 34 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 135 km (84 mi) more estimated range
  • Emits 25 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Smallest trunk

Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 D240

  • Has 15 hp more
  • Has 200 Nm more
  • Is 0.9 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 679 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
DS 7 Crossback 1.6 PureTech
Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 D240
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

1.6 PureTech
25d
VS
DS7 Crossback1.6 PureTechvsBMWX2 (F39)25d
2.0 D240
2.0i
VS
JaguarE-Pace2.0 D240vsJaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0i
1.6 PureTech
GLA 250
VS
DS7 Crossback1.6 PureTechvsMercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 250
2.0 D240
25d
VS
JaguarE-Pace2.0 D240vsJaguarF-Pace25d
1.6 PureTech
JCW 2.0
VS
DS7 Crossback1.6 PureTechvsMiniCountryman (F60)JCW 2.0
2.0 D240
2.0i
VS
JaguarE-Pace2.0 D240vsJaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0i
1.6 PureTech
25i
VS
DS7 Crossback1.6 PureTechvsBMWX1 (F48)25i
2.0 D240
300
VS
JaguarE-Pace2.0 D240vsLexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300
1.6 PureTech
2.0 TSI
VS
DS7 Crossback1.6 PureTechvsVolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI
2.0 D240
2.0 D5
VS
JaguarE-Pace2.0 D240vsVolvoXC60 II2.0 D5
1.6 PureTech
2.0 EcoBoost
VS
DS7 Crossback1.6 PureTechvsFordKuga IIFacelift 20162.0 EcoBoost
2.0 D240
2.0
VS
JaguarE-Pace2.0 D240vsPorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0
DS 7 Crossback 1.6 PureTech vs Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 D240 - car comparison - FastVsFaster