Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) · Facelift 2017
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) · Facelift 2017 GLA 250vsDS 7 Crossback 1.6 PureTech
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonDS 7 Crossback
1.6 PureTech
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
DS 7 Crossback 1.6 PureTech
- Most powerful225 hp168 kW
- Best power-to-weight158 hp/t118 kW/t6.3 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.0 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,033 km642 mi
- Largest trunk555 L
- Best economy score91/100
- Best practicality score86/100
Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) Facelift 2017 GLA 250
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.7 s
- Fastest top speed235 km/h146 mph
- Highest torque350 Nm258 lb-ft
- Lightest1,360 kg2,998 lb
- Best overall score63/100
- Best performance score55/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 250 | DS7 Crossback1.6 PureTech |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 211hp157kW | 225hp168kW |
| Torque | 350Nm258lb-ft | 300Nm221lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,360kg2,998lb | 1,420kg3,131lb |
| Gross weight | 1,970kg4,343lb | 2,045kg4,508lb |
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | 227 km/h 141 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 68.5s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated | 87.1s99% target: 225 km/h / 140 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.7s | 8.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 26.0s Calculated | 36.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.4s Calculated | 7.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 14.7s Calculated | 16.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 155hp/t116kW/t70hp/1000 lb Calculated | 158hp/t118kW/t72hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 257Nm/t172lb-ft/ton Calculated | 211Nm/t141lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 806km501mi Calculated | 1,033km642mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,991cc121cu in | 1,598cc98cu in |
| Length | 4,424mm174in | 4,573mm180in |
| Width | 1,804mm71in | 1,895mm75in |
| Height | 1,494mm59in | 1,620mm64in |
| Wheelbase | 2,699mm106in | 2,738mm108in |
| Front track | 1,569mm62in | - |
| Rear track | 1,560mm61in | - |
| Trunk volume | 421L | 555L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,235L | 628L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 50L | 62L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 137g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) Facelift 2017 GLA 250: Power / Torque
- DS 7 Crossback 1.6 PureTech: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 250 | 5,500 rpm | 1,200-4,000 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| DS7 Crossback1.6 PureTech | 5,500 rpm | 1,900 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 250 | DS7 Crossback1.6 PureTech |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.4 s | 7.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.7 s | 8.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 26.0 s | 36.3 s |
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | 227 km/h 141 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.5 s | 7.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.7 s | 10.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.4 s | 13.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.7 s | 16.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 159 km/h 99 mph | 146 km/h 91 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 250 | 211 hp 157 kW |
| DS7 Crossback1.6 PureTech | 225 hp 168 kW |
DS 7 Crossback 1.6 PureTech has 14 hp more than Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) Facelift 2017 GLA 250.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) Facelift 2017 GLA 250 and DS 7 Crossback 1.6 PureTech: 14 hp (10 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 250 | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
| DS7 Crossback1.6 PureTech | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 250 | 1,360 kg 2,998 lb |
| DS7 Crossback1.6 PureTech | 1,420 kg 3,131 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 250 | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| DS7 Crossback1.6 PureTech | 227 km/h 141 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 250 | 6.7 s |
| DS7 Crossback1.6 PureTech | 8.3 s |
Although DS 7 Crossback 1.6 PureTech has more power, Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) Facelift 2017 GLA 250 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) Facelift 2017 GLA 250 and DS 7 Crossback 1.6 PureTech: 1.6 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 250 | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK |
| DS7 Crossback1.6 PureTech | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 250 | 155 hp/t 116 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp |
| DS7 Crossback1.6 PureTech | 158 hp/t 118 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 250 | 806 km 501 mi |
| DS7 Crossback1.6 PureTech | 1,033 km 642 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 250 | 211 hp 157 kW | 6.7 s | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| DS7 Crossback1.6 PureTech | 225 hp 168 kW | 8.3 s | 227 km/h 141 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 250 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| DS7 Crossback1.6 PureTech |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 250 |
| 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| DS7 Crossback1.6 PureTech |
| 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) Facelift 2017 GLA 250 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 250 | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | 6.7 s |
| DS7 Crossback1.6 PureTech | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | 8.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 250 | 155 hp/t 116 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK |
| DS7 Crossback1.6 PureTech | 158 hp/t 118 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 250 | DS7 Crossback1.6 PureTech | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 211 hp 157 kW | 225 hp 168 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.7 s | 8.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | 227 km/h 141 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,360 kg 2,998 lb | 1,420 kg 3,131 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 806 km 501 mi | 1,033 km 642 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 137 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 421 L 14.9 cu ft | 555 L 19.6 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 155 hp/t 116 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp | 158 hp/t 118 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) Facelift 2017 GLA 250 | DS 7 Crossback 1.6 PureTech |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK | 6 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.85 LC100 km | 10.50 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 17.46 LC100 mi | 16.90 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 930 L246 US gal205 UK gal | 900 L238 US gal198 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,628 LC/year | 1,575 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) Facelift 2017 GLA 250
- Has 50 Nm more
- Is 60 kg lighter
- Is 1.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 8 km/h (5 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lightest
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
DS 7 Crossback 1.6 PureTech
- Has 14 hp more
- Uses 0.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 3 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 227 km (141 mi) more estimated range
- Has 134 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























