DS 7 Crossback
Car comparison
DS 7 Crossback 1.6 PureTechvsFord Kuga II · Facelift 2016 2.0 EcoBoost
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonFord Kuga II · Facelift 2016
2.0 EcoBoost
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
DS 7 Crossback 1.6 PureTech
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.3 s
- Fastest top speed227 km/h141 mph
- Lightest1,420 kg3,131 lb
- Best power-to-weight158 hp/t118 kW/t6.3 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.0 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions137 g/km
- Best estimated range1,033 km642 mi
- Largest trunk555 L
- Best overall score61/100
- Best performance score49/100
- Best economy score91/100
- Best practicality score86/100
Ford Kuga II Facelift 2016 2.0 EcoBoost
- Most powerful242 hp180 kW
- Highest torque394 Nm291 lb-ft
Specification comparison
| Model | DS7 Crossback1.6 PureTech | FordKuga IIFacelift 20162.0 EcoBoost |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 225hp168kW | 242hp180kW |
| Torque | 300Nm221lb-ft | 394Nm291lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,420kg3,131lb | 1,702kg3,752lb |
| Gross weight | 2,045kg4,508lb | 2,250kg4,960lb |
| Top speed | 227 km/h 141 mph | 212 km/h 132 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 87.1s99% target: 225 km/h / 140 mph Calculated | 88.0s99% target: 210 km/h / 130 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.3s | 8.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 36.3s Calculated | 50.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.9s Calculated | 8.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK | 8.7L/100 km27mpg US32.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 11.3L/100 km20.8mpg US25.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.0s Calculated | 16.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 158hp/t118kW/t72hp/1000 lb Calculated | 142hp/t106kW/t64hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 211Nm/t141lb-ft/ton Calculated | 231Nm/t155lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,033km642mi Calculated | 690km429mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,598cc98cu in | 1,999cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,573mm180in | 4,531mm178in |
| Width | 1,895mm75in | 1,838mm72in |
| Height | 1,620mm64in | 1,703mm67in |
| Wheelbase | 2,738mm108in | 2,690mm106in |
| Front track | - | 1,573mm62in |
| Rear track | - | 1,583mm62in |
| Trunk volume | 555L | 456L |
| Max trunk volume | 628L | 1,653L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 62L | 60L |
| CO2 emissions | 137g/km | 199g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- DS 7 Crossback 1.6 PureTech: Power / Torque
- Ford Kuga II Facelift 2016 2.0 EcoBoost: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| DS7 Crossback1.6 PureTech | 5,500 rpm | 1,900 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| FordKuga IIFacelift 20162.0 EcoBoost | 5,000 rpm | 2,500 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | DS7 Crossback1.6 PureTech | FordKuga IIFacelift 20162.0 EcoBoost |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.9 s | 8.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.3 s | 8.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 36.3 s | 50.8 s |
| Top speed | 227 km/h 141 mph | 212 km/h 132 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.0 s | 7.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.5 s | 10.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.5 s | 13.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.0 s | 16.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 146 km/h 91 mph | 141 km/h 87 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| DS7 Crossback1.6 PureTech | 225 hp 168 kW |
| FordKuga IIFacelift 20162.0 EcoBoost | 242 hp 180 kW |
Ford Kuga II Facelift 2016 2.0 EcoBoost has 17 hp more than DS 7 Crossback 1.6 PureTech.
The biggest power difference is between DS 7 Crossback 1.6 PureTech and Ford Kuga II Facelift 2016 2.0 EcoBoost: 17 hp (13 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| DS7 Crossback1.6 PureTech | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
| FordKuga IIFacelift 20162.0 EcoBoost | 394 Nm 291 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| DS7 Crossback1.6 PureTech | 1,420 kg 3,131 lb |
| FordKuga IIFacelift 20162.0 EcoBoost | 1,702 kg 3,752 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| DS7 Crossback1.6 PureTech | 227 km/h 141 mph |
| FordKuga IIFacelift 20162.0 EcoBoost | 212 km/h 132 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| DS7 Crossback1.6 PureTech | 8.3 s |
| FordKuga IIFacelift 20162.0 EcoBoost | 8.8 s |
Although Ford Kuga II Facelift 2016 2.0 EcoBoost has more power, DS 7 Crossback 1.6 PureTech is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between DS 7 Crossback 1.6 PureTech and Ford Kuga II Facelift 2016 2.0 EcoBoost: 0.5 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| DS7 Crossback1.6 PureTech | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK |
| FordKuga IIFacelift 20162.0 EcoBoost | 8.7 L/100 km 27.0 mpg US 32.5 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between DS 7 Crossback 1.6 PureTech and Ford Kuga II Facelift 2016 2.0 EcoBoost: 2.7 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| DS7 Crossback1.6 PureTech | 158 hp/t 118 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp |
| FordKuga IIFacelift 20162.0 EcoBoost | 142 hp/t 106 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| DS7 Crossback1.6 PureTech | 1,033 km 642 mi |
| FordKuga IIFacelift 20162.0 EcoBoost | 690 km 429 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| DS7 Crossback1.6 PureTech | 225 hp 168 kW | 8.3 s | 227 km/h 141 mph |
| FordKuga IIFacelift 20162.0 EcoBoost | 242 hp 180 kW | 8.8 s | 212 km/h 132 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DS7 Crossback1.6 PureTech |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| FordKuga IIFacelift 20162.0 EcoBoost |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DS7 Crossback1.6 PureTech |
| 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| FordKuga IIFacelift 20162.0 EcoBoost |
| 8.7 L/100 km 27.0 mpg US 32.5 mpg UK | ||||||
DS 7 Crossback 1.6 PureTech is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| DS7 Crossback1.6 PureTech | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | 8.3 s |
| FordKuga IIFacelift 20162.0 EcoBoost | 8.7 L/100 km 27.0 mpg US 32.5 mpg UK | 8.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| DS7 Crossback1.6 PureTech | 158 hp/t 118 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK |
| FordKuga IIFacelift 20162.0 EcoBoost | 142 hp/t 106 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp | 8.7 L/100 km 27.0 mpg US 32.5 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | DS7 Crossback1.6 PureTech | FordKuga IIFacelift 20162.0 EcoBoost | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 225 hp 168 kW | 242 hp 180 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | 394 Nm 291 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.3 s | 8.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 227 km/h 141 mph | 212 km/h 132 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,420 kg 3,131 lb | 1,702 kg 3,752 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | 8.7 L/100 km 27.0 mpg US 32.5 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,033 km 642 mi | 690 km 429 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 137 g/km | 199 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 555 L 19.6 cu ft | 456 L 16.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 158 hp/t 118 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp | 142 hp/t 106 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | DS 7 Crossback 1.6 PureTech | Ford Kuga II Facelift 2016 2.0 EcoBoost |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK | 8.7 L/100 km27 mpg US32.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.50 LC100 km | 15.22 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 16.90 LC100 mi | 24.50 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 900 L238 US gal198 UK gal | 1,305 L345 US gal287 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,575 LC/year | 2,284 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
DS 7 Crossback 1.6 PureTech
- Is 282 kg lighter
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 15 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 2.7 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 16 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 344 km (214 mi) more estimated range
- Has 99 L more trunk volume
- Emits 62 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
Ford Kuga II Facelift 2016 2.0 EcoBoost
- Has 17 hp more
- Has 94 Nm more
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























