Car comparison

Ford Puma ST 1.5 EcoBoostvsFord Kuga II · Facelift 2016 2.0 EcoBoost

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Ford Puma

ST 1.5 EcoBoost

200 hp1496 ccGasolineFWDManualTurbochargedSUV2020-2024

Ford Kuga II · Facelift 2016

2.0 EcoBoost

242 hp1999 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2017-2018

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Ford Puma ST 1.5 EcoBoost

Quickest 0-100 km/h
6.7 s
Fastest top speed
230 km/h
143 mph Unrestricted
220 km/h
137 mph Restricted
Lightest
1,358 kg
2,994 lb
Best power-to-weight
147 hp/t
110 kW/t
6.8 kg/hp
Lowest combined fuel consumption
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK
Lowest city consumption
7.6 L/100 km
30.9 mpg US
37.2 mpg UK
Lowest highway consumption
5.0 L/100 km
47.0 mpg US
56.5 mpg UK
Largest trunk
456 L
Best overall score
63/100
Best performance score
54/100
Best economy score
91/100

Ford Kuga II Facelift 2016 2.0 EcoBoost

Most powerful
242 hp
180 kW
Highest torque
394 Nm
291 lb-ft
Best practicality score
83/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
Model	FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost	FordKuga IIFacelift 20162.0 EcoBoost
Power	200hp149kW	242hp180kW
Torque	320Nm236lb-ft	394Nm291lb-ft
Curb weight	1,358kg2,994lb	1,702kg3,752lb
Gross weight	1,815kg4,001lb	2,250kg4,960lb
Top speed	Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph Calculated	212 km/h 132 mph
To 99% top speed	68.1s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated	88.0s99% target: 210 km/h / 130 mph Calculated
0-100 km/h	6.7s	8.8s
0-200 km/h	27.5s Calculated	50.8s Calculated
0-60 mph	6.4s Calculated	8.3s Calculated
Fuel consumption	6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK	8.7L/100 km27mpg US32.5mpg UK
Fuel consumption city	7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK	11.3L/100 km20.8mpg US25.0mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway	5L/100 km47mpg US56.5mpg UK	7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK
Quarter mile	14.7s Calculated	16.4s Calculated
Power-to-weight	147hp/t110kW/t67hp/1000 lb Calculated	142hp/t106kW/t64hp/1000 lb Calculated
Torque-to-weight	236Nm/t158lb-ft/ton Calculated	231Nm/t155lb-ft/ton Calculated
Estimated range	-	690km429mi Calculated
Displacement	1,496cc91cu in	1,999cc122cu in
Length	4,226mm166in	4,531mm178in
Width	1,805mm71in	1,838mm72in
Height	1,520mm60in	1,703mm67in
Wheelbase	2,588mm102in	2,690mm106in
Front track	-	1,573mm62in
Rear track	-	1,583mm62in
Ground clearance	152mm6in	-
Trunk volume	456L	456L
Max trunk volume	1,216L	1,653L
Doors	5	5
Seats	5	5
Fuel tank	-	60L
CO2 emissions	-	199g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Ford Puma ST 1.5 EcoBoostFord Kuga II Facelift 2016 2.0 EcoBoostPowerTorque

Dyno simulation data table
Vehicle	Peak power RPM	Peak torque RPM	Max engine speed
FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost	6,000 rpm	2,500-3,500 rpm	6,250 rpm
FordKuga IIFacelift 20162.0 EcoBoost	5,000 rpm	2,500 rpm	5,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
Metric	FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost	FordKuga IIFacelift 20162.0 EcoBoost
	Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h	6.4 s	8.3 s
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph	6.7 s	8.8 s
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph	27.5 s	50.8 s
Top speed	Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph Likely limited	212 km/h 132 mph
	Drag race simulation
60 ft 18 m	2.5 s	2.7 s
330 ft 101 m	6.5 s	7.1 s
1/8 mile 201 m	9.7 s	10.7 s
1000 ft 305 m	12.4 s	13.8 s
1/4 mile 402 m	14.7 s	16.4 s
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m	158 km/h 98 mph	141 km/h 87 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost	200 hp 149 kW
FordKuga IIFacelift 20162.0 EcoBoost	242 hp 180 kW

Ford Kuga II Facelift 2016 2.0 EcoBoost has 42 hp more than Ford Puma ST 1.5 EcoBoost.

The biggest power difference is between Ford Puma ST 1.5 EcoBoost and Ford Kuga II Facelift 2016 2.0 EcoBoost: 42 hp (31 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost	320 Nm 236 lb-ft
FordKuga IIFacelift 20162.0 EcoBoost	394 Nm 291 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost	1,358 kg 2,994 lb
FordKuga IIFacelift 20162.0 EcoBoost	1,702 kg 3,752 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost	Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph
FordKuga IIFacelift 20162.0 EcoBoost	212 km/h 132 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost	6.7 s
FordKuga IIFacelift 20162.0 EcoBoost	8.8 s

Although Ford Kuga II Facelift 2016 2.0 EcoBoost has more power, Ford Puma ST 1.5 EcoBoost is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Ford Puma ST 1.5 EcoBoost and Ford Kuga II Facelift 2016 2.0 EcoBoost: 2.1 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost	6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK
FordKuga IIFacelift 20162.0 EcoBoost	8.7 L/100 km 27.0 mpg US 32.5 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Ford Puma ST 1.5 EcoBoost and Ford Kuga II Facelift 2016 2.0 EcoBoost: 2.7 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost	147 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp
FordKuga IIFacelift 20162.0 EcoBoost	142 hp/t 106 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
Vehicle	Power	Acceleration	Top speed
FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost	200 hp 149 kW	6.7 s	Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph
FordKuga IIFacelift 20162.0 EcoBoost	242 hp 180 kW	8.8 s	212 km/h 132 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Vehicle

Performance score

Practicality score

FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost

Power	200 hp 149 kW
0-100 km/h	6.7 s
Top speed Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph

Doors/seats	5 doors 5 seats
Trunk	456 L 16.1 cu ft
Length	4,226 mm 166.4 in
Height	1,520 mm 59.8 in

FordKuga IIFacelift 20162.0 EcoBoost

Power	242 hp 180 kW
0-100 km/h	8.8 s
Top speed 212 km/h 132 mph

Doors/seats	5 doors 5 seats
Trunk	456 L 16.1 cu ft
Length	4,531 mm 178.4 in
Height	1,703 mm 67.0 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Vehicle

Performance score

Fuel economy score

FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost

Power	200 hp 149 kW
0-100 km/h	6.7 s
Top speed Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph

6.0 L/100 km

39.2 mpg US

47.1 mpg UK

FordKuga IIFacelift 20162.0 EcoBoost

Power	242 hp 180 kW
0-100 km/h	8.8 s
Top speed 212 km/h 132 mph

8.7 L/100 km

27.0 mpg US

32.5 mpg UK

Ford Puma ST 1.5 EcoBoost is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
Vehicle	Fuel consumption, L/100 km	0-100 km/h, s
FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost	6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK	6.7 s
FordKuga IIFacelift 20162.0 EcoBoost	8.7 L/100 km 27.0 mpg US 32.5 mpg UK	8.8 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
Vehicle	Power-to-weight, hp/t	Fuel consumption, L/100 km
FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost	147 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp	6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK
FordKuga IIFacelift 20162.0 EcoBoost	142 hp/t 106 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp	8.7 L/100 km 27.0 mpg US 32.5 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Vehicle

FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost

FordKuga IIFacelift 20162.0 EcoBoost

Power

200 hp

149 kW

242 hp

180 kW

Torque

320 Nm

236 lb-ft

394 Nm

291 lb-ft

Acceleration

6.7 s

8.8 s

Top speed

Unrestricted

230 km/h143 mph

Restricted

220 km/h137 mph

212 km/h

132 mph

Lightness

1,358 kg

2,994 lb

1,702 kg

3,752 lb

Fuel consumption

6.0 L/100 km

39.2 mpg US

47.1 mpg UK

8.7 L/100 km

27.0 mpg US

32.5 mpg UK

Practicality

Doors/seats	5 doors 5 seats
Trunk	456 L 16.1 cu ft
Length	4,226 mm 166.4 in
Height	1,520 mm 59.8 in

Doors/seats	5 doors 5 seats
Trunk	456 L 16.1 cu ft
Length	4,531 mm 178.4 in
Height	1,703 mm 67.0 in

Range score

690 km

429 mi

CO2 score

199 g/km

Trunk score

456 L

16.1 cu ft

456 L

16.1 cu ft

Power-to-weight score

147 hp/t

110 kW/t

6.8 kg/hp

142 hp/t

106 kW/t

7.0 kg/hp

Overall

Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Average annual distanceDistance unitFuel price in your local currencyPrice unit

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
Vehicle	Ford Puma ST 1.5 EcoBoost	Ford Kuga II Facelift 2016 2.0 EcoBoost
Consumption	6 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK	8.7 L/100 km27 mpg US32.5 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km	10.50 LC100 km	15.22 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi	16.90 LC100 mi	24.50 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used	900 L238 US gal198 UK gal	1,305 L345 US gal287 UK gal
Annual fuel cost	1,575 LC/year	2,284 LC/year