Car comparison

Rimac Nevera 120 kWhvsCzinger 21C 2.9 V8

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Rimac Nevera

120 kWh

1914 hpElectricAWDCoupe2021-present
VS

Czinger 21C

2.9 V8

950 hp2880 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTwin-turboCoupe2020-present

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Rimac Nevera 120 kWh

  • Fastest top speed
    412 km/h
    256 mph
  • Most powerful
    1,914 hp
    1,427 kW
  • Highest torque
    2,360 Nm
    1,741 lb-ft
  • Best power-to-weight
    890 hp/t
    664 kW/t
    1.1 kg/hp
  • Best economy score
    0/100
  • Best practicality score
    39/100

Czinger 21C 2.9 V8

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    1.9 s
  • Lightest
    1,250 kg
    2,756 lb
  • Best overall score
    78/100
  • Best performance score
    97/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelRimacNevera120 kWhCzinger21C2.9 V8
Power
1,914hp1,427kW
950hp708kW
Torque
2,360Nm1,741lb-ft
746Nm550lb-ft
Curb weight
2,150kg4,740lb
1,250kg2,756lb
Top speed
412 km/h
256 mph
407 km/h
253 mph
To 99% top speed
34.3s99% target: 408 km/h / 253 mph
Calculated
30.1s99% target: 403 km/h / 250 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
2.0s
1.9s
0-200 km/h
4.8s
Calculated
4.5s
Calculated
0-60 mph
1.9s
Calculated
1.8s
Calculated
Quarter mile
8.5s
Calculated
8.3s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
890hp/t664kW/t404hp/1000 lb
Calculated
760hp/t567kW/t345hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
1,098Nm/t734lb-ft/ton
Calculated
597Nm/t399lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Displacement-
2,880cc176cu in
Length
4,750mm187in
-
Width
1,986mm78in
-
Height
1,208mm48in
-
Wheelbase
2,745mm108in
-
Doors
2
2
Seats
2
2

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricRimacNevera120 kWhCzinger21C2.9 V8
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
1.9 s
1.8 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
2.0 s
1.9 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
4.8 s
4.5 s
0-200 mph
0-322 km/h
11.1 s
10.3 s
Top speed
412 km/h
256 mph
407 km/h
253 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
1.5 s
1.5 s
330 ft
101 m
3.9 s
3.8 s
1/8 mile
201 m
5.7 s
5.6 s
1000 ft
305 m
7.2 s
7.1 s
1/4 mile
402 m
8.5 s
8.3 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
284 km/h
176 mph
291 km/h
181 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
RimacNevera120 kWh
1,914 hp
1,427 kW
Czinger21C2.9 V8
950 hp
708 kW

Rimac Nevera 120 kWh has 964 hp more than Czinger 21C 2.9 V8.

The biggest power difference is between Czinger 21C 2.9 V8 and Rimac Nevera 120 kWh: 964 hp (719 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
RimacNevera120 kWh
2,360 Nm
1,741 lb-ft
Czinger21C2.9 V8
746 Nm
550 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
RimacNevera120 kWh
2,150 kg
4,740 lb
Czinger21C2.9 V8
1,250 kg
2,756 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
RimacNevera120 kWh
412 km/h
256 mph
Czinger21C2.9 V8
407 km/h
253 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
RimacNevera120 kWh2.0 s
Czinger21C2.9 V81.9 s

Although Rimac Nevera 120 kWh has more power, Czinger 21C 2.9 V8 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Czinger 21C 2.9 V8 and Rimac Nevera 120 kWh: 0.1 s.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
RimacNevera120 kWh
890 hp/t
664 kW/t
1.1 kg/hp
Czinger21C2.9 V8
760 hp/t
567 kW/t
1.3 kg/hp

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
RimacNevera120 kWh
1,914 hp
1,427 kW
2.0 s
412 km/h
256 mph
Czinger21C2.9 V8
950 hp
708 kW
1.9 s
407 km/h
253 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
RimacNevera120 kWh
Power
1,914 hp
1,427 kW
0-100 km/h2.0 s
Top speed
412 km/h
256 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,750 mm
187.0 in
Height
1,208 mm
47.6 in
Czinger21C2.9 V8
Power
950 hp
708 kW
0-100 km/h1.9 s
Top speed
407 km/h
253 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk-
Length-
Height-

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleRimacNevera120 kWhCzinger21C2.9 V8
Power
1,914 hp
1,427 kW
950 hp
708 kW
Torque
2,360 Nm
1,741 lb-ft
746 Nm
550 lb-ft
Acceleration
2.0 s
1.9 s
Top speed
412 km/h
256 mph
407 km/h
253 mph
Lightness
2,150 kg
4,740 lb
1,250 kg
2,756 lb
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,750 mm
187.0 in
Height
1,208 mm
47.6 in
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk-
Length-
Height-
Power-to-weight score
890 hp/t
664 kW/t
1.1 kg/hp
760 hp/t
567 kW/t
1.3 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Head-to-head comparisons

Rimac Nevera 120 kWh

  • Has 964 hp more
  • Has 1,614 Nm more
  • Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 130 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Heaviest

Czinger 21C 2.9 V8

  • Is 900 kg lighter
  • Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Lightest

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Rimac Nevera 120 kWh
Czinger 21C 2.9 V8
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

120 kWh
Super Sport 8.0 W16
VS
RimacNevera120 kWhvsBugattiChironSuper Sport 8.0 W16
2.9 V8
4.0 V8
VS
Czinger21C2.9 V8vsMcLarenSpeedtail4.0 V8
120 kWh
8.0 W16
VS
RimacNevera120 kWhvsBugattiCentodieci8.0 W16
2.9 V8
4.0 V8
VS
Czinger21C2.9 V8vsMcLarenW14.0 V8
120 kWh
8.0 W16
VS
RimacNevera120 kWhvsBugattiDivo8.0 W16
2.9 V8
4.0 V8
VS
Czinger21C2.9 V8vsMcLarenSenna4.0 V8
120 kWh
90 kWh
VS
RimacNevera120 kWhvsRimacConcept One90 kWh
2.9 V8
3.0 V6
VS
Czinger21C2.9 V8vsFerrariF803.0 V6
2.9 V8
70 kWh
VS
Czinger21C2.9 V8vsLotusTheory 170 kWh
120 kWh
5.0 V8
VS
RimacNevera120 kWhvsKoenigseggOne:15.0 V8
120 kWh
3.9 V8
VS
RimacNevera120 kWhvsFerrariF8 Tributo3.9 V8
120 kWh
3.9 V8
VS
RimacNevera120 kWhvsFerrariF8 Spider3.9 V8
Rimac Nevera 120 kWh vs Czinger 21C 2.9 V8 - car comparison - FastVsFaster