Car comparison

Czinger 21C 2.9 V8vsMcLaren Speedtail 4.0 V8

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Czinger 21C

2.9 V8

950 hp2880 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTwin-turboCoupe2020-present
VS

McLaren Speedtail

4.0 V8

1070 hpGasolineRWDDual-clutchTwin-turboCoupe2020-2020

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Czinger 21C 2.9 V8

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    1.9 s
  • Fastest top speed
    407 km/h
    253 mph
  • Lightest
    1,250 kg
    2,756 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    760 hp/t
    567 kW/t
    1.3 kg/hp
  • Best performance score
    97/100

McLaren Speedtail 4.0 V8

  • Most powerful
    1,070 hp
    798 kW
  • Highest torque
    1,150 Nm
    848 lb-ft
  • Best overall score
    81/100
  • Best economy score
    65/100
  • Best practicality score
    51/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelCzinger21C2.9 V8McLarenSpeedtail4.0 V8
Power
950hp708kW
1,070hp798kW
Torque
746Nm550lb-ft
1,150Nm848lb-ft
Curb weight
1,250kg2,756lb
1,597kg3,521lb
Top speed
407 km/h
253 mph
403 km/h
250 mph
To 99% top speed
30.1s99% target: 403 km/h / 250 mph
Calculated
47.1s99% target: 399 km/h / 248 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
1.9s
3.0s
0-200 km/h
4.5s
Calculated
7.2s
Calculated
0-60 mph
1.8s
Calculated
2.9s
Calculated
Fuel consumption-
15.6L/100 km15.1mpg US18.1mpg UK
Quarter mile
8.3s
Calculated
10.0s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
760hp/t567kW/t345hp/1000 lb
Calculated
670hp/t500kW/t304hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
597Nm/t399lb-ft/ton
Calculated
720Nm/t482lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Displacement
2,880cc176cu in
-
Length-
5,137mm202in
Width-
2,000mm79in
Height-
1,120mm44in
Wheelbase-
2,670mm105in
Doors
2
2
Seats
2
4

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Czinger 21C 2.9 V8McLaren Speedtail 4.0 V8PowerTorque
  • Czinger 21C 2.9 V8: Power / Torque
  • McLaren Speedtail 4.0 V8: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
Czinger21C2.9 V810,500 rpm-11,000 rpm
McLarenSpeedtail4.0 V8-5,500-6,500 rpm6,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricCzinger21C2.9 V8McLarenSpeedtail4.0 V8
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
1.8 s
2.9 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
1.9 s
3.0 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
4.5 s
7.2 s
0-200 mph
0-322 km/h
10.3 s
16.6 s
Top speed
407 km/h
253 mph
403 km/h
250 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
1.5 s
1.9 s
330 ft
101 m
3.8 s
4.7 s
1/8 mile
201 m
5.6 s
6.8 s
1000 ft
305 m
7.1 s
8.6 s
1/4 mile
402 m
8.3 s
10.0 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
291 km/h
181 mph
250 km/h
155 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Czinger21C2.9 V8
950 hp
708 kW
McLarenSpeedtail4.0 V8
1,070 hp
798 kW

McLaren Speedtail 4.0 V8 has 120 hp more than Czinger 21C 2.9 V8.

The biggest power difference is between Czinger 21C 2.9 V8 and McLaren Speedtail 4.0 V8: 120 hp (89 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Czinger21C2.9 V8
746 Nm
550 lb-ft
McLarenSpeedtail4.0 V8
1,150 Nm
848 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Czinger21C2.9 V8
1,250 kg
2,756 lb
McLarenSpeedtail4.0 V8
1,597 kg
3,521 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Czinger21C2.9 V8
407 km/h
253 mph
McLarenSpeedtail4.0 V8
403 km/h
250 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Czinger21C2.9 V81.9 s
McLarenSpeedtail4.0 V83.0 s

Although McLaren Speedtail 4.0 V8 has more power, Czinger 21C 2.9 V8 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Czinger 21C 2.9 V8 and McLaren Speedtail 4.0 V8: 1.1 s.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Czinger21C2.9 V8
760 hp/t
567 kW/t
1.3 kg/hp
McLarenSpeedtail4.0 V8
670 hp/t
500 kW/t
1.5 kg/hp

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
Czinger21C2.9 V8
950 hp
708 kW
1.9 s
407 km/h
253 mph
McLarenSpeedtail4.0 V8
1,070 hp
798 kW
3.0 s
403 km/h
250 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
Czinger21C2.9 V8
Power
950 hp
708 kW
0-100 km/h1.9 s
Top speed
407 km/h
253 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk-
Length-
Height-
McLarenSpeedtail4.0 V8
Power
1,070 hp
798 kW
0-100 km/h3.0 s
Top speed
403 km/h
250 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk-
Length
5,137 mm
202.2 in
Height
1,120 mm
44.1 in

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleCzinger21C2.9 V8McLarenSpeedtail4.0 V8
Power
950 hp
708 kW
1,070 hp
798 kW
Torque
746 Nm
550 lb-ft
1,150 Nm
848 lb-ft
Acceleration
1.9 s
3.0 s
Top speed
407 km/h
253 mph
403 km/h
250 mph
Lightness
1,250 kg
2,756 lb
1,597 kg
3,521 lb
Fuel consumption
-
15.6 L/100 km
15.1 mpg US
18.1 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk-
Length-
Height-
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk-
Length
5,137 mm
202.2 in
Height
1,120 mm
44.1 in
Power-to-weight score
760 hp/t
567 kW/t
1.3 kg/hp
670 hp/t
500 kW/t
1.5 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleMcLaren Speedtail 4.0 V8
Consumption15.6 L/100 km15.1 mpg US18.1 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km27.30 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi43.94 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used2,340 L618 US gal515 UK gal
Annual fuel cost4,095 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Czinger 21C 2.9 V8

  • Is 347 kg lighter
  • Is 1.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 4 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 90 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Lowest power

McLaren Speedtail 4.0 V8

  • Has 120 hp more
  • Has 404 Nm more

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Czinger 21C 2.9 V8
McLaren Speedtail 4.0 V8
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.9 V8
4.0 V8
VS
Czinger21C2.9 V8vsMcLarenW14.0 V8
2.9 V8
4.0 V8
VS
Czinger21C2.9 V8vsMcLarenSenna4.0 V8
2.9 V8
3.0 V6
VS
Czinger21C2.9 V8vsFerrariF803.0 V6
4.0 V8
4.0 V8
VS
McLarenSpeedtail4.0 V8vsMcLaren765LT4.0 V8
2.9 V8
70 kWh
VS
Czinger21C2.9 V8vsLotusTheory 170 kWh
4.0 V8
4.0 V8
VS
McLarenSpeedtail4.0 V8vsMcLaren720S4.0 V8
2.9 V8
Pur Sport 8.0 W16
VS
Czinger21C2.9 V8vsBugattiChironPur Sport 8.0 W16
4.0 V8
90 kWh
VS
McLarenSpeedtail4.0 V8vsRimacConcept One90 kWh
2.9 V8
8.0 W16
VS
Czinger21C2.9 V8vsBugattiDivo8.0 W16
4.0 V8
4.0 V8
VS
McLarenSpeedtail4.0 V8vsMcLaren750S4.0 V8
2.9 V8
6.5 V12
VS
Czinger21C2.9 V8vsFerrari812 Competizione6.5 V12
2.9 V8
6.5 V12
VS
Czinger21C2.9 V8vsFerrari812 Competizione A6.5 V12
Czinger 21C 2.9 V8 vs McLaren Speedtail 4.0 V8 - car comparison - FastVsFaster