Car comparison

Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSIvsSkoda Kodiaq II RS 2.0 TSI

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Cupra Terramar

2.0 TSI

265 hp1984 ccGasolineAWDDual-clutchTurbochargedSUV2024-present
VS

Skoda Kodiaq II

RS 2.0 TSI

265 hp1984 ccGasolineAWDDual-clutchTurbochargedSUV2024-present

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    5.9 s
  • Fastest top speed
    243 km/h
    151 mph
  • Most powerful
    265 hp
    198 kW
  • Highest torque
    400 Nm
    295 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,675 kg
    3,693 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    158 hp/t
    118 kW/t
    6.3 kg/hp
  • Best estimated range
    682 km
    424 mi
  • Best overall score
    69/100
  • Best performance score
    61/100

Skoda Kodiaq II RS 2.0 TSI

  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    8.6 L/100 km
    27.4 mpg US
    32.8 mpg UK
  • Largest trunk
    910 L
  • Best economy score
    84/100
  • Best practicality score
    92/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelCupraTerramar2.0 TSISkodaKodiaq IIRS 2.0 TSI
Power
265hp198kW
265hp198kW
Torque
400Nm295lb-ft
400Nm295lb-ft
Curb weight
1,675kg3,693lb
1,891kg4,169lb
Gross weight
2,290kg5,049lb
2,420kg5,335lb
Top speed
243 km/h
151 mph
231 km/h
144 mph
To 99% top speed
67.3s99% target: 241 km/h / 149 mph
Calculated
69.8s99% target: 229 km/h / 142 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
5.9s
6.3s
0-200 km/h
22.4s
Calculated
26.9s
Calculated
0-60 mph
5.6s
Calculated
6.0s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK
8.6L/100 km27.4mpg US32.8mpg UK
Quarter mile
14.0s
Calculated
14.4s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
158hp/t118kW/t72hp/1000 lb
Calculated
140hp/t105kW/t64hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
239Nm/t160lb-ft/ton
Calculated
212Nm/t142lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
682km424mi
Calculated
674km419mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,984cc121cu in
1,984cc121cu in
Length
4,519mm178in
4,761mm187in
Width
1,869mm74in
1,864mm73in
Height
1,586mm62in
1,663mm65in
Wheelbase
2,681mm106in
2,791mm110in
Front track
1,590mm63in
1,580mm62in
Rear track
1,580mm62in
1,570mm62in
Ground clearance-
194mm8in
Trunk volume
540L
910L
Max trunk volume-
2,105L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
60L
58L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSISkoda Kodiaq II RS 2.0 TSIPowerTorque
  • Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
  • Skoda Kodiaq II RS 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
CupraTerramar2.0 TSI5,300-6,500 rpm1,650-4,350 rpm6,750 rpm
SkodaKodiaq IIRS 2.0 TSI5,000-6,500 rpm1,650-4,350 rpm6,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricCupraTerramar2.0 TSISkodaKodiaq IIRS 2.0 TSI
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
5.6 s
6.0 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
5.9 s
6.3 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
22.4 s
26.9 s
Top speed
243 km/h
151 mph
231 km/h
144 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.4 s
2.4 s
330 ft
101 m
6.1 s
6.3 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.2 s
9.4 s
1000 ft
305 m
11.8 s
12.1 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.0 s
14.4 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
166 km/h
103 mph
159 km/h
99 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraTerramar2.0 TSI
265 hp
198 kW
SkodaKodiaq IIRS 2.0 TSI
265 hp
198 kW

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraTerramar2.0 TSI
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
SkodaKodiaq IIRS 2.0 TSI
400 Nm
295 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraTerramar2.0 TSI
1,675 kg
3,693 lb
SkodaKodiaq IIRS 2.0 TSI
1,891 kg
4,169 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraTerramar2.0 TSI
243 km/h
151 mph
SkodaKodiaq IIRS 2.0 TSI
231 km/h
144 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraTerramar2.0 TSI5.9 s
SkodaKodiaq IIRS 2.0 TSI6.3 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI and Skoda Kodiaq II RS 2.0 TSI: 0.4 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraTerramar2.0 TSI
8.8 L/100 km
26.7 mpg US
32.1 mpg UK
SkodaKodiaq IIRS 2.0 TSI
8.6 L/100 km
27.4 mpg US
32.8 mpg UK

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraTerramar2.0 TSI
158 hp/t
118 kW/t
6.3 kg/hp
SkodaKodiaq IIRS 2.0 TSI
140 hp/t
105 kW/t
7.1 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraTerramar2.0 TSI
682 km
424 mi
SkodaKodiaq IIRS 2.0 TSI
674 km
419 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
CupraTerramar2.0 TSI
265 hp
198 kW
5.9 s
243 km/h
151 mph
SkodaKodiaq IIRS 2.0 TSI
265 hp
198 kW
6.3 s
231 km/h
144 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
CupraTerramar2.0 TSI
Power
265 hp
198 kW
0-100 km/h5.9 s
Top speed
243 km/h
151 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
540 L
19.1 cu ft
Length
4,519 mm
177.9 in
Height
1,586 mm
62.4 in
SkodaKodiaq IIRS 2.0 TSI
Power
265 hp
198 kW
0-100 km/h6.3 s
Top speed
231 km/h
144 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
910 L
32.1 cu ft
Length
4,761 mm
187.4 in
Height
1,663 mm
65.5 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
CupraTerramar2.0 TSI
Power
265 hp
198 kW
0-100 km/h5.9 s
Top speed
243 km/h
151 mph
8.8 L/100 km
26.7 mpg US
32.1 mpg UK
SkodaKodiaq IIRS 2.0 TSI
Power
265 hp
198 kW
0-100 km/h6.3 s
Top speed
231 km/h
144 mph
8.6 L/100 km
27.4 mpg US
32.8 mpg UK

Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
CupraTerramar2.0 TSI
8.8 L/100 km
26.7 mpg US
32.1 mpg UK
5.9 s
SkodaKodiaq IIRS 2.0 TSI
8.6 L/100 km
27.4 mpg US
32.8 mpg UK
6.3 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
CupraTerramar2.0 TSI
158 hp/t
118 kW/t
6.3 kg/hp
8.8 L/100 km
26.7 mpg US
32.1 mpg UK
SkodaKodiaq IIRS 2.0 TSI
140 hp/t
105 kW/t
7.1 kg/hp
8.6 L/100 km
27.4 mpg US
32.8 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleCupraTerramar2.0 TSISkodaKodiaq IIRS 2.0 TSI
Power
265 hp
198 kW
265 hp
198 kW
Torque
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
Acceleration
5.9 s
6.3 s
Top speed
243 km/h
151 mph
231 km/h
144 mph
Lightness
1,675 kg
3,693 lb
1,891 kg
4,169 lb
Fuel consumption
8.8 L/100 km
26.7 mpg US
32.1 mpg UK
8.6 L/100 km
27.4 mpg US
32.8 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
540 L
19.1 cu ft
Length
4,519 mm
177.9 in
Height
1,586 mm
62.4 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
910 L
32.1 cu ft
Length
4,761 mm
187.4 in
Height
1,663 mm
65.5 in
Range score
682 km
424 mi
674 km
419 mi
Trunk score
540 L
19.1 cu ft
910 L
32.1 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
158 hp/t
118 kW/t
6.3 kg/hp
140 hp/t
105 kW/t
7.1 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleCupra Terramar 2.0 TSISkoda Kodiaq II RS 2.0 TSI
Consumption8.8 L/100 km26.7 mpg US32.1 mpg UK8.6 L/100 km27.4 mpg US32.8 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km15.40 LC100 km15.05 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi24.78 LC100 mi24.22 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,320 L349 US gal290 UK gal1,290 L341 US gal284 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,310 LC/year2,258 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI

  • Is 216 kg lighter
  • Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 12 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 18 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 7 km (5 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Smallest trunk

Skoda Kodiaq II RS 2.0 TSI

  • Uses 0.2 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 370 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI
Skoda Kodiaq II RS 2.0 TSI
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
CupraTerramar2.0 TSIvsCupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TSI
RS 2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
SkodaKodiaq IIRS 2.0 TSIvsVolkswagenTayron II2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
CupraTerramar2.0 TSIvsCupraFormentor2.0 TSI
RS 2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
SkodaKodiaq IIRS 2.0 TSIvsVolkswagenTiguan III2.0 TSI
RS 2.0 TSI
2.0 T4
VS
SkodaKodiaq IIRS 2.0 TSIvsAlfa RomeoTonale2.0 T4
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
CupraTerramar2.0 TSIvsCupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI
RS 2.0 TSI
T 2.0
VS
SkodaKodiaq IIRS 2.0 TSIvsPorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 2021T 2.0
RS 2.0 TSI
2.0 TFSI
VS
SkodaKodiaq IIRS 2.0 TSIvsAUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
CupraTerramar2.0 TSIvsCupraAteca2.0 TSI
RS 2.0 TSI
45 TFSI
VS
SkodaKodiaq IIRS 2.0 TSIvsAUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202045 TFSI
RS 2.0 TSI
JCW 54.2 kWh
VS
SkodaKodiaq IIRS 2.0 TSIvsMiniAceman (J05)JCW 54.2 kWh
2.0 TSI
45 TFSI
VS
CupraTerramar2.0 TSIvsAUDIQ3 II (F3)45 TFSI
Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI vs Skoda Kodiaq II RS 2.0 TSI - car comparison - FastVsFaster