Volkswagen Tiguan III
Car comparison
Volkswagen Tiguan III 2.0 TSIvsSkoda Kodiaq II RS 2.0 TSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonSkoda Kodiaq II
RS 2.0 TSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volkswagen Tiguan III 2.0 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.9 s
- Fastest top speed242 km/h150 mph
- Most powerful265 hp198 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lightest1,678 kg3,699 lb
- Best power-to-weight158 hp/t118 kW/t6.3 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.5 L/100 km27.7 mpg US33.2 mpg UK
- Best estimated range682 km424 mi
- Best overall score70/100
- Best performance score61/100
- Best economy score84/100
Skoda Kodiaq II RS 2.0 TSI
- Largest trunk910 L
- Best practicality score92/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolkswagenTiguan III2.0 TSI | SkodaKodiaq IIRS 2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 265hp198kW | 265hp198kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,678kg3,699lb | 1,891kg4,169lb |
| Gross weight | 2,220kg4,894lb | 2,420kg5,335lb |
| Top speed | 242 km/h 150 mph | 231 km/h 144 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 65.0s99% target: 240 km/h / 149 mph Calculated | 69.8s99% target: 229 km/h / 142 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.9s | 6.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 22.2s Calculated | 26.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.6s Calculated | 6.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK | 8.6L/100 km27.4mpg US32.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.0s Calculated | 14.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 158hp/t118kW/t72hp/1000 lb Calculated | 140hp/t105kW/t64hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 238Nm/t160lb-ft/ton Calculated | 212Nm/t142lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 682km424mi Calculated | 674km419mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,539mm179in | 4,761mm187in |
| Width | 1,859mm73in | 1,864mm73in |
| Height | 1,656mm65in | 1,663mm65in |
| Wheelbase | 2,680mm106in | 2,791mm110in |
| Front track | 1,588mm63in | 1,580mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,578mm62in | 1,570mm62in |
| Ground clearance | - | 194mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 652L | 910L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,650L | 2,105L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 58L | 58L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volkswagen Tiguan III 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
- Skoda Kodiaq II RS 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan III2.0 TSI | 5,000 rpm | 1,650-4,350 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
| SkodaKodiaq IIRS 2.0 TSI | 5,000-6,500 rpm | 1,650-4,350 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolkswagenTiguan III2.0 TSI | SkodaKodiaq IIRS 2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.6 s | 6.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.9 s | 6.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 22.2 s | 26.9 s |
| Top speed | 242 km/h 150 mph | 231 km/h 144 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.2 s | 6.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.2 s | 9.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.8 s | 12.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.0 s | 14.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 166 km/h 103 mph | 159 km/h 99 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan III2.0 TSI | 265 hp 198 kW |
| SkodaKodiaq IIRS 2.0 TSI | 265 hp 198 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan III2.0 TSI | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| SkodaKodiaq IIRS 2.0 TSI | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan III2.0 TSI | 1,678 kg 3,699 lb |
| SkodaKodiaq IIRS 2.0 TSI | 1,891 kg 4,169 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan III2.0 TSI | 242 km/h 150 mph |
| SkodaKodiaq IIRS 2.0 TSI | 231 km/h 144 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan III2.0 TSI | 5.9 s |
| SkodaKodiaq IIRS 2.0 TSI | 6.3 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen Tiguan III 2.0 TSI and Skoda Kodiaq II RS 2.0 TSI: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan III2.0 TSI | 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK |
| SkodaKodiaq IIRS 2.0 TSI | 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan III2.0 TSI | 158 hp/t 118 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp |
| SkodaKodiaq IIRS 2.0 TSI | 140 hp/t 105 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan III2.0 TSI | 682 km 424 mi |
| SkodaKodiaq IIRS 2.0 TSI | 674 km 419 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan III2.0 TSI | 265 hp 198 kW | 5.9 s | 242 km/h 150 mph |
| SkodaKodiaq IIRS 2.0 TSI | 265 hp 198 kW | 6.3 s | 231 km/h 144 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan III2.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| SkodaKodiaq IIRS 2.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan III2.0 TSI |
| 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| SkodaKodiaq IIRS 2.0 TSI |
| 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK | ||||||
Volkswagen Tiguan III 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan III2.0 TSI | 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK | 5.9 s |
| SkodaKodiaq IIRS 2.0 TSI | 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK | 6.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan III2.0 TSI | 158 hp/t 118 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp | 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK |
| SkodaKodiaq IIRS 2.0 TSI | 140 hp/t 105 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp | 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolkswagenTiguan III2.0 TSI | SkodaKodiaq IIRS 2.0 TSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 265 hp 198 kW | 265 hp 198 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.9 s | 6.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 242 km/h 150 mph | 231 km/h 144 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,678 kg 3,699 lb | 1,891 kg 4,169 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK | 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 682 km 424 mi | 674 km 419 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 652 L 23.0 cu ft | 910 L 32.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 158 hp/t 118 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp | 140 hp/t 105 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volkswagen Tiguan III 2.0 TSI | Skoda Kodiaq II RS 2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.5 L/100 km27.7 mpg US33.2 mpg UK | 8.6 L/100 km27.4 mpg US32.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 14.88 LC100 km | 15.05 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 23.94 LC100 mi | 24.22 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,275 L337 US gal280 UK gal | 1,290 L341 US gal284 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,231 LC/year | 2,258 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volkswagen Tiguan III 2.0 TSI
- Is 213 kg lighter
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 11 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 18 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 8 km (5 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Smallest trunk
Skoda Kodiaq II RS 2.0 TSI
- Has 258 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























