Car comparison

Cupra Formentor · Facelift 2024 2.0 TSIvsSkoda Kodiaq II RS 2.0 TSI

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Cupra Formentor · Facelift 2024

2.0 TSI

265 hp1984 ccGasolineFWDDual-clutchTurbochargedSUV2024-present
VS

Skoda Kodiaq II

RS 2.0 TSI

265 hp1984 ccGasolineAWDDual-clutchTurbochargedSUV2024-present

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Cupra Formentor Facelift 2024 2.0 TSI

  • Fastest top speed
    245 km/h
    152 mph
  • Most powerful
    265 hp
    198 kW
  • Lightest
    1,465 kg
    3,230 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    181 hp/t
    135 kW/t
    5.5 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    7.9 L/100 km
    29.8 mpg US
    35.8 mpg UK
  • Best performance score
    60/100
  • Best economy score
    86/100

Skoda Kodiaq II RS 2.0 TSI

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.3 s
  • Highest torque
    400 Nm
    295 lb-ft
  • Best estimated range
    674 km
    419 mi
  • Largest trunk
    910 L
  • Best overall score
    69/100
  • Best practicality score
    92/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelCupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TSISkodaKodiaq IIRS 2.0 TSI
Power
265hp198kW
265hp198kW
Torque
370Nm273lb-ft
400Nm295lb-ft
Curb weight
1,465kg3,230lb
1,891kg4,169lb
Gross weight
2,060kg4,542lb
2,420kg5,335lb
Top speed
245 km/h
152 mph
231 km/h
144 mph
To 99% top speed
68.9s99% target: 243 km/h / 151 mph
Calculated
69.8s99% target: 229 km/h / 142 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
6.5s
6.3s
0-200 km/h
23.3s
Calculated
26.9s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.2s
Calculated
6.0s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK
8.6L/100 km27.4mpg US32.8mpg UK
Quarter mile
14.5s
Calculated
14.4s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
181hp/t135kW/t82hp/1000 lb
Calculated
140hp/t105kW/t64hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
253Nm/t169lb-ft/ton
Calculated
212Nm/t142lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
633km393mi
Calculated
674km419mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,984cc121cu in
1,984cc121cu in
Length
4,451mm175in
4,761mm187in
Width
1,839mm72in
1,864mm73in
Height
1,520mm60in
1,663mm65in
Wheelbase
2,679mm105in
2,791mm110in
Front track
1,583mm62in
1,580mm62in
Rear track
1,555mm61in
1,570mm62in
Ground clearance-
194mm8in
Trunk volume
450L
910L
Max trunk volume-
2,105L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
50L
58L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Cupra Formentor Facelift 2024 2.0 TSISkoda Kodiaq II RS 2.0 TSIPowerTorque
  • Cupra Formentor Facelift 2024 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
  • Skoda Kodiaq II RS 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
CupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TSI5,600-6,500 rpm1,600-4,500 rpm6,750 rpm
SkodaKodiaq IIRS 2.0 TSI5,000-6,500 rpm1,650-4,350 rpm6,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricCupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TSISkodaKodiaq IIRS 2.0 TSI
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.2 s
6.0 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
6.5 s
6.3 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
23.3 s
26.9 s
Top speed
245 km/h
152 mph
231 km/h
144 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.4 s
330 ft
101 m
6.5 s
6.3 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.6 s
9.4 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.3 s
12.1 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.5 s
14.4 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
163 km/h
101 mph
159 km/h
99 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TSI
265 hp
198 kW
SkodaKodiaq IIRS 2.0 TSI
265 hp
198 kW

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TSI
370 Nm
273 lb-ft
SkodaKodiaq IIRS 2.0 TSI
400 Nm
295 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TSI
1,465 kg
3,230 lb
SkodaKodiaq IIRS 2.0 TSI
1,891 kg
4,169 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TSI
245 km/h
152 mph
SkodaKodiaq IIRS 2.0 TSI
231 km/h
144 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TSI6.5 s
SkodaKodiaq IIRS 2.0 TSI6.3 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Skoda Kodiaq II RS 2.0 TSI and Cupra Formentor Facelift 2024 2.0 TSI: 0.2 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TSI
7.9 L/100 km
29.8 mpg US
35.8 mpg UK
SkodaKodiaq IIRS 2.0 TSI
8.6 L/100 km
27.4 mpg US
32.8 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Cupra Formentor Facelift 2024 2.0 TSI and Skoda Kodiaq II RS 2.0 TSI: 0.7 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TSI
181 hp/t
135 kW/t
5.5 kg/hp
SkodaKodiaq IIRS 2.0 TSI
140 hp/t
105 kW/t
7.1 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TSI
633 km
393 mi
SkodaKodiaq IIRS 2.0 TSI
674 km
419 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
CupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TSI
265 hp
198 kW
6.5 s
245 km/h
152 mph
SkodaKodiaq IIRS 2.0 TSI
265 hp
198 kW
6.3 s
231 km/h
144 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
CupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TSI
Power
265 hp
198 kW
0-100 km/h6.5 s
Top speed
245 km/h
152 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
450 L
15.9 cu ft
Length
4,451 mm
175.2 in
Height
1,520 mm
59.8 in
SkodaKodiaq IIRS 2.0 TSI
Power
265 hp
198 kW
0-100 km/h6.3 s
Top speed
231 km/h
144 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
910 L
32.1 cu ft
Length
4,761 mm
187.4 in
Height
1,663 mm
65.5 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
CupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TSI
Power
265 hp
198 kW
0-100 km/h6.5 s
Top speed
245 km/h
152 mph
7.9 L/100 km
29.8 mpg US
35.8 mpg UK
SkodaKodiaq IIRS 2.0 TSI
Power
265 hp
198 kW
0-100 km/h6.3 s
Top speed
231 km/h
144 mph
8.6 L/100 km
27.4 mpg US
32.8 mpg UK

Cupra Formentor Facelift 2024 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
CupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TSI
7.9 L/100 km
29.8 mpg US
35.8 mpg UK
6.5 s
SkodaKodiaq IIRS 2.0 TSI
8.6 L/100 km
27.4 mpg US
32.8 mpg UK
6.3 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
CupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TSI
181 hp/t
135 kW/t
5.5 kg/hp
7.9 L/100 km
29.8 mpg US
35.8 mpg UK
SkodaKodiaq IIRS 2.0 TSI
140 hp/t
105 kW/t
7.1 kg/hp
8.6 L/100 km
27.4 mpg US
32.8 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleCupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TSISkodaKodiaq IIRS 2.0 TSI
Power
265 hp
198 kW
265 hp
198 kW
Torque
370 Nm
273 lb-ft
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
Acceleration
6.5 s
6.3 s
Top speed
245 km/h
152 mph
231 km/h
144 mph
Lightness
1,465 kg
3,230 lb
1,891 kg
4,169 lb
Fuel consumption
7.9 L/100 km
29.8 mpg US
35.8 mpg UK
8.6 L/100 km
27.4 mpg US
32.8 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
450 L
15.9 cu ft
Length
4,451 mm
175.2 in
Height
1,520 mm
59.8 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
910 L
32.1 cu ft
Length
4,761 mm
187.4 in
Height
1,663 mm
65.5 in
Range score
633 km
393 mi
674 km
419 mi
Trunk score
450 L
15.9 cu ft
910 L
32.1 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
181 hp/t
135 kW/t
5.5 kg/hp
140 hp/t
105 kW/t
7.1 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleCupra Formentor Facelift 2024 2.0 TSISkoda Kodiaq II RS 2.0 TSI
Consumption7.9 L/100 km29.8 mpg US35.8 mpg UK8.6 L/100 km27.4 mpg US32.8 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km13.83 LC100 km15.05 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi22.25 LC100 mi24.22 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,185 L313 US gal261 UK gal1,290 L341 US gal284 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,074 LC/year2,258 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Cupra Formentor Facelift 2024 2.0 TSI

  • Is 426 kg lighter
  • Has 14 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 0.7 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 41 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Smallest trunk

Skoda Kodiaq II RS 2.0 TSI

  • Has 30 Nm more
  • Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 42 km (26 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 460 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest torque
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Cupra Formentor 2.0 TSI
Skoda Kodiaq II RS 2.0 TSI
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
CupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TSIvsCupraFormentor2.0 TSI
RS 2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
SkodaKodiaq IIRS 2.0 TSIvsVolkswagenTayron II2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
CupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TSIvsCupraTerramar2.0 TSI
RS 2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
SkodaKodiaq IIRS 2.0 TSIvsVolkswagenTiguan III2.0 TSI
RS 2.0 TSI
2.0 T4
VS
SkodaKodiaq IIRS 2.0 TSIvsAlfa RomeoTonale2.0 T4
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
CupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TSIvsCupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI
RS 2.0 TSI
T 2.0
VS
SkodaKodiaq IIRS 2.0 TSIvsPorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 2021T 2.0
RS 2.0 TSI
2.0 TFSI
VS
SkodaKodiaq IIRS 2.0 TSIvsAUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
CupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TSIvsCupraAteca2.0 TSI
RS 2.0 TSI
45 TFSI
VS
SkodaKodiaq IIRS 2.0 TSIvsAUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202045 TFSI
RS 2.0 TSI
JCW 54.2 kWh
VS
SkodaKodiaq IIRS 2.0 TSIvsMiniAceman (J05)JCW 54.2 kWh
RS 2.0 TSI
3.0 V6 TDI
VS
SkodaKodiaq IIRS 2.0 TSIvsVolkswagenTouareg III (CR)Facelift 20233.0 V6 TDI
Cupra Formentor · Facelift 2024 2.0 TSI vs Skoda Kodiaq II RS 2.0 TSI - car comparison - FastVsFaster