Car comparison

Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSIvsMaserati Grecale · Facelift 2026 2.0

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Cupra Terramar

2.0 TSI

265 hp1984 ccGasolineAWDDual-clutchTurbochargedSUV2024-present
VS

Maserati Grecale · Facelift 2026

2.0

250 hp1995 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2026-present

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    5.9 s
  • Fastest top speed
    243 km/h
    151 mph
  • Most powerful
    265 hp
    198 kW
  • Lightest
    1,675 kg
    3,693 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    158 hp/t
    118 kW/t
    6.3 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    8.8 L/100 km
    26.7 mpg US
    32.1 mpg UK
  • Largest trunk
    540 L
  • Best overall score
    69/100
  • Best performance score
    61/100
  • Best economy score
    83/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelCupraTerramar2.0 TSIMaseratiGrecaleFacelift 20262.0
Power
265hp198kW
250hp186kW
Torque
400Nm295lb-ft
420Nm310lb-ft
Curb weight
1,675kg3,693lb
1,870kg4,123lb
Gross weight
2,290kg5,049lb
-
Top speed
243 km/h
151 mph
229 km/h
142 mph
To 99% top speed
67.1s99% target: 241 km/h / 149 mph
Calculated
72.3s99% target: 227 km/h / 141 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
5.9s
6.3s
0-200 km/h
22.4s
Calculated
28.3s
Calculated
0-60 mph
5.6s
Calculated
6.0s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK
9.3L/100 km25.3mpg US30.4mpg UK
Quarter mile
14.0s
Calculated
14.4s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
158hp/t118kW/t72hp/1000 lb
Calculated
134hp/t100kW/t61hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
239Nm/t160lb-ft/ton
Calculated
225Nm/t150lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
682km424mi
Calculated
688km428mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,984cc121cu in
1,995cc122cu in
Length
4,519mm178in
4,873mm192in
Width
1,869mm74in
1,947mm77in
Height
1,586mm62in
1,687mm66in
Wheelbase
2,681mm106in
2,901mm114in
Front track
1,590mm63in
1,620mm64in
Rear track
1,580mm62in
1,692mm67in
Trunk volume
540L
535L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
60L
64L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSIMaserati Grecale Facelift 2026 2.0PowerTorque
  • Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
  • Maserati Grecale Facelift 2026 2.0: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
CupraTerramar2.0 TSI5,300-6,500 rpm1,650-4,350 rpm6,750 rpm
MaseratiGrecaleFacelift 20262.04,750 rpm2,250 rpm5,000 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricCupraTerramar2.0 TSIMaseratiGrecaleFacelift 20262.0
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
5.6 s
6.0 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
5.9 s
6.3 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
22.4 s
28.3 s
Top speed
243 km/h
151 mph
229 km/h
142 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.4 s
2.3 s
330 ft
101 m
6.1 s
6.2 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.2 s
9.4 s
1000 ft
305 m
11.8 s
12.1 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.0 s
14.4 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
166 km/h
103 mph
158 km/h
98 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraTerramar2.0 TSI
265 hp
198 kW
MaseratiGrecaleFacelift 20262.0
250 hp
186 kW

Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI has 15 hp more than Maserati Grecale Facelift 2026 2.0.

The biggest power difference is between Maserati Grecale Facelift 2026 2.0 and Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI: 15 hp (11 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraTerramar2.0 TSI
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
MaseratiGrecaleFacelift 20262.0
420 Nm
310 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraTerramar2.0 TSI
1,675 kg
3,693 lb
MaseratiGrecaleFacelift 20262.0
1,870 kg
4,123 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraTerramar2.0 TSI
243 km/h
151 mph
MaseratiGrecaleFacelift 20262.0
229 km/h
142 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraTerramar2.0 TSI5.9 s
MaseratiGrecaleFacelift 20262.06.3 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI and Maserati Grecale Facelift 2026 2.0: 0.4 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraTerramar2.0 TSI
8.8 L/100 km
26.7 mpg US
32.1 mpg UK
MaseratiGrecaleFacelift 20262.0
9.3 L/100 km
25.3 mpg US
30.4 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI and Maserati Grecale Facelift 2026 2.0: 0.5 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraTerramar2.0 TSI
158 hp/t
118 kW/t
6.3 kg/hp
MaseratiGrecaleFacelift 20262.0
134 hp/t
100 kW/t
7.5 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraTerramar2.0 TSI
682 km
424 mi
MaseratiGrecaleFacelift 20262.0
688 km
428 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
CupraTerramar2.0 TSI
265 hp
198 kW
5.9 s
243 km/h
151 mph
MaseratiGrecaleFacelift 20262.0
250 hp
186 kW
6.3 s
229 km/h
142 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
CupraTerramar2.0 TSI
Power
265 hp
198 kW
0-100 km/h5.9 s
Top speed
243 km/h
151 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
540 L
19.1 cu ft
Length
4,519 mm
177.9 in
Height
1,586 mm
62.4 in
MaseratiGrecaleFacelift 20262.0
Power
250 hp
186 kW
0-100 km/h6.3 s
Top speed
229 km/h
142 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
535 L
18.9 cu ft
Length
4,873 mm
191.9 in
Height
1,687 mm
66.4 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
CupraTerramar2.0 TSI
Power
265 hp
198 kW
0-100 km/h5.9 s
Top speed
243 km/h
151 mph
8.8 L/100 km
26.7 mpg US
32.1 mpg UK
MaseratiGrecaleFacelift 20262.0
Power
250 hp
186 kW
0-100 km/h6.3 s
Top speed
229 km/h
142 mph
9.3 L/100 km
25.3 mpg US
30.4 mpg UK

Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
CupraTerramar2.0 TSI
8.8 L/100 km
26.7 mpg US
32.1 mpg UK
5.9 s
MaseratiGrecaleFacelift 20262.0
9.3 L/100 km
25.3 mpg US
30.4 mpg UK
6.3 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
CupraTerramar2.0 TSI
158 hp/t
118 kW/t
6.3 kg/hp
8.8 L/100 km
26.7 mpg US
32.1 mpg UK
MaseratiGrecaleFacelift 20262.0
134 hp/t
100 kW/t
7.5 kg/hp
9.3 L/100 km
25.3 mpg US
30.4 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleCupraTerramar2.0 TSIMaseratiGrecaleFacelift 20262.0
Power
265 hp
198 kW
250 hp
186 kW
Torque
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
420 Nm
310 lb-ft
Acceleration
5.9 s
6.3 s
Top speed
243 km/h
151 mph
229 km/h
142 mph
Lightness
1,675 kg
3,693 lb
1,870 kg
4,123 lb
Fuel consumption
8.8 L/100 km
26.7 mpg US
32.1 mpg UK
9.3 L/100 km
25.3 mpg US
30.4 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
540 L
19.1 cu ft
Length
4,519 mm
177.9 in
Height
1,586 mm
62.4 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
535 L
18.9 cu ft
Length
4,873 mm
191.9 in
Height
1,687 mm
66.4 in
Range score
682 km
424 mi
688 km
428 mi
Trunk score
540 L
19.1 cu ft
535 L
18.9 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
158 hp/t
118 kW/t
6.3 kg/hp
134 hp/t
100 kW/t
7.5 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleCupra Terramar 2.0 TSIMaserati Grecale Facelift 2026 2.0
Consumption8.8 L/100 km26.7 mpg US32.1 mpg UK9.3 L/100 km25.3 mpg US30.4 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km15.40 LC100 km16.28 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi24.78 LC100 mi26.19 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,320 L349 US gal290 UK gal1,395 L369 US gal307 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,310 LC/year2,441 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI

  • Has 15 hp more
  • Is 195 kg lighter
  • Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 14 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 0.5 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 25 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 5 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Maserati Grecale Facelift 2026 2.0

  • Has 20 Nm more
  • Has 6 km (4 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Highest torque
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI
Maserati Grecale 2.0
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
CupraTerramar2.0 TSIvsCupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TSI
2.0
GT 2.0
VS
MaseratiGrecaleFacelift 20262.0vsMaseratiGrecaleGT 2.0
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
CupraTerramar2.0 TSIvsCupraFormentor2.0 TSI
2.0
45 TFSI
VS
MaseratiGrecaleFacelift 20262.0vsAUDIQ3 II (F3)45 TFSI
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
CupraTerramar2.0 TSIvsVolkswagenTiguan III2.0 TSI
2.0
JCW 54.2 kWh
VS
MaseratiGrecaleFacelift 20262.0vsMiniAceman (J05)JCW 54.2 kWh
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
CupraTerramar2.0 TSIvsVolkswagenTayron II2.0 TSI
2.0
2.0 TFSI
VS
MaseratiGrecaleFacelift 20262.0vsAUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
CupraTerramar2.0 TSIvsCupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI
2.0
EQE 300 100 kWh
VS
MaseratiGrecaleFacelift 20262.0vsMercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)EQE 300 100 kWh
2.0 TSI
2.0 T4
VS
CupraTerramar2.0 TSIvsAlfa RomeoTonale2.0 T4
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
CupraTerramar2.0 TSIvsCupraAteca2.0 TSI
Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI vs Maserati Grecale · Facelift 2026 2.0 - car comparison - FastVsFaster