Car comparison

Mercedes-Benz CLK (A208) · Facelift 1999 AMG CLK 55 V8vsChrysler Crossfire Roadster SRT-6 3.2i V6

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Mercedes-Benz CLK (A208) · Facelift 1999

AMG CLK 55 V8

347 hp5439 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticNaturally aspiratedCabriolet / convertible1999-2002
VS

Chrysler Crossfire Roadster

SRT-6 3.2i V6

330 hp3199 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticSuperchargedCabriolet / convertible2004-2006

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Chrysler Crossfire Roadster SRT-6 3.2i V6

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    5.3 s
  • Lightest
    1,495 kg
    3,296 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    221 hp/t
    165 kW/t
    4.5 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    11.0 L/100 km
    21.4 mpg US
    25.7 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    15.9 L/100 km
    14.8 mpg US
    17.8 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    8.2 L/100 km
    28.7 mpg US
    34.4 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    545 km
    339 mi
  • Best economy score
    77/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelMercedes-BenzCLK (A208)Facelift 1999AMG CLK 55 V8ChryslerCrossfire RoadsterSRT-6 3.2i V6
Power
347hp259kW
330hp246kW
Torque
510Nm376lb-ft
420Nm310lb-ft
Curb weight
1,680kg3,704lb
1,495kg3,296lb
Gross weight
2,080kg4,586lb
1,755kg3,869lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
255 km/h
158 mph
To 99% top speed
80.2s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph
Calculated
64.8s99% target: 252 km/h / 157 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
6.2s
5.3s
0-200 km/h
21.8s
Calculated
18.8s
Calculated
0-60 mph
5.9s
Calculated
5.0s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
11.7L/100 km20.1mpg US24.1mpg UK
11L/100 km21.4mpg US25.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
17.1L/100 km13.8mpg US16.5mpg UK
15.9L/100 km14.8mpg US17.8mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK
8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK
Quarter mile
14.2s
Calculated
13.4s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
207hp/t154kW/t94hp/1000 lb
Calculated
221hp/t165kW/t100hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
304Nm/t203lb-ft/ton
Calculated
281Nm/t188lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
530km329mi
Calculated
545km339mi
Calculated
Displacement
5,439cc332cu in
3,199cc195cu in
Length
4,567mm180in
4,060mm160in
Width
1,722mm68in
1,765mm69in
Height
1,380mm54in
1,305mm51in
Wheelbase
2,690mm106in
2,400mm94in
Front track
1,505mm59in
1,495mm59in
Rear track
1,488mm59in
1,500mm59in
Trunk volume-
105L
Max trunk volume-
190L
Doors
2
2
Seats
4
2
Fuel tank
62L
60L
CO2 emissions-
264g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Mercedes-Benz CLK (A208) Facelift 1999 AMG CLK 55 V8Chrysler Crossfire Roadster SRT-6 3.2i V6PowerTorque
  • Mercedes-Benz CLK (A208) Facelift 1999 AMG CLK 55 V8: Power / Torque
  • Chrysler Crossfire Roadster SRT-6 3.2i V6: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
Mercedes-BenzCLK (A208)Facelift 1999AMG CLK 55 V85,500 rpm3,000-4,300 rpm5,750 rpm
ChryslerCrossfire RoadsterSRT-6 3.2i V66,100 rpm3,500 rpm6,350 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricMercedes-BenzCLK (A208)Facelift 1999AMG CLK 55 V8ChryslerCrossfire RoadsterSRT-6 3.2i V6
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
5.9 s
5.0 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
6.2 s
5.3 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
21.8 s
18.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Limited
255 km/h
158 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.4 s
2.3 s
330 ft
101 m
6.3 s
5.9 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.4 s
8.8 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.0 s
11.3 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.2 s
13.4 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
165 km/h
103 mph
173 km/h
108 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Mercedes-Benz CLK (A208) Facelift 1999 AMG CLK 55 V8 has 17 hp more than Chrysler Crossfire Roadster SRT-6 3.2i V6.

The biggest power difference is between Chrysler Crossfire Roadster SRT-6 3.2i V6 and Mercedes-Benz CLK (A208) Facelift 1999 AMG CLK 55 V8: 17 hp (13 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzCLK (A208)Facelift 1999AMG CLK 55 V8
1,680 kg
3,704 lb
ChryslerCrossfire RoadsterSRT-6 3.2i V6
1,495 kg
3,296 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzCLK (A208)Facelift 1999AMG CLK 55 V8
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
ChryslerCrossfire RoadsterSRT-6 3.2i V6
255 km/h
158 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Although Mercedes-Benz CLK (A208) Facelift 1999 AMG CLK 55 V8 has more power, Chrysler Crossfire Roadster SRT-6 3.2i V6 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Chrysler Crossfire Roadster SRT-6 3.2i V6 and Mercedes-Benz CLK (A208) Facelift 1999 AMG CLK 55 V8: 0.9 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzCLK (A208)Facelift 1999AMG CLK 55 V8
11.7 L/100 km
20.1 mpg US
24.1 mpg UK
ChryslerCrossfire RoadsterSRT-6 3.2i V6
11.0 L/100 km
21.4 mpg US
25.7 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Chrysler Crossfire Roadster SRT-6 3.2i V6 and Mercedes-Benz CLK (A208) Facelift 1999 AMG CLK 55 V8: 0.7 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzCLK (A208)Facelift 1999AMG CLK 55 V8
207 hp/t
154 kW/t
4.8 kg/hp
ChryslerCrossfire RoadsterSRT-6 3.2i V6
221 hp/t
165 kW/t
4.5 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
Mercedes-BenzCLK (A208)Facelift 1999AMG CLK 55 V8
347 hp
259 kW
6.2 s
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
ChryslerCrossfire RoadsterSRT-6 3.2i V6
330 hp
246 kW
5.3 s
255 km/h
158 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
Mercedes-BenzCLK (A208)Facelift 1999AMG CLK 55 V8
Power
347 hp
259 kW
0-100 km/h6.2 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,567 mm
179.8 in
Height
1,380 mm
54.3 in
ChryslerCrossfire RoadsterSRT-6 3.2i V6
Power
330 hp
246 kW
0-100 km/h5.3 s
Top speed
255 km/h
158 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
105 L
3.7 cu ft
Length
4,060 mm
159.8 in
Height
1,305 mm
51.4 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
Mercedes-BenzCLK (A208)Facelift 1999AMG CLK 55 V8
Power
347 hp
259 kW
0-100 km/h6.2 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
11.7 L/100 km
20.1 mpg US
24.1 mpg UK
ChryslerCrossfire RoadsterSRT-6 3.2i V6
Power
330 hp
246 kW
0-100 km/h5.3 s
Top speed
255 km/h
158 mph
11.0 L/100 km
21.4 mpg US
25.7 mpg UK

Chrysler Crossfire Roadster SRT-6 3.2i V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
Mercedes-BenzCLK (A208)Facelift 1999AMG CLK 55 V8
11.7 L/100 km
20.1 mpg US
24.1 mpg UK
6.2 s
ChryslerCrossfire RoadsterSRT-6 3.2i V6
11.0 L/100 km
21.4 mpg US
25.7 mpg UK
5.3 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
Mercedes-BenzCLK (A208)Facelift 1999AMG CLK 55 V8
207 hp/t
154 kW/t
4.8 kg/hp
11.7 L/100 km
20.1 mpg US
24.1 mpg UK
ChryslerCrossfire RoadsterSRT-6 3.2i V6
221 hp/t
165 kW/t
4.5 kg/hp
11.0 L/100 km
21.4 mpg US
25.7 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleMercedes-BenzCLK (A208)Facelift 1999AMG CLK 55 V8ChryslerCrossfire RoadsterSRT-6 3.2i V6
Power
347 hp
259 kW
330 hp
246 kW
Torque
510 Nm
376 lb-ft
420 Nm
310 lb-ft
Acceleration
6.2 s
5.3 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
255 km/h
158 mph
Lightness
1,680 kg
3,704 lb
1,495 kg
3,296 lb
Fuel consumption
11.7 L/100 km
20.1 mpg US
24.1 mpg UK
11.0 L/100 km
21.4 mpg US
25.7 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,567 mm
179.8 in
Height
1,380 mm
54.3 in
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
105 L
3.7 cu ft
Length
4,060 mm
159.8 in
Height
1,305 mm
51.4 in
Range score
530 km
329 mi
545 km
339 mi
CO2 score
-
264 g/km
Trunk score
-
105 L
3.7 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
207 hp/t
154 kW/t
4.8 kg/hp
221 hp/t
165 kW/t
4.5 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleMercedes-Benz CLK (A208) Facelift 1999 AMG CLK 55 V8Chrysler Crossfire Roadster SRT-6 3.2i V6
Consumption11.7 L/100 km20.1 mpg US24.1 mpg UK11 L/100 km21.4 mpg US25.7 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km20.47 LC100 km19.25 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi32.95 LC100 mi30.98 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,755 L464 US gal386 UK gal1,650 L436 US gal363 UK gal
Annual fuel cost3,071 LC/year2,888 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Chrysler Crossfire Roadster SRT-6 3.2i V6

  • Is 185 kg lighter
  • Is 0.9 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 0.7 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 14 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 16 km (10 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Mercedes-Benz CLK (A208) AMG CLK 55 V8
Chrysler Crossfire Roadster SRT-6 3.2i V6
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Mercedes-Benz CLK (A208) · Facelift 1999 AMG CLK 55 V8 vs Chrysler Crossfire Roadster SRT-6 3.2i V6 - car comparison - FastVsFaster