Chevrolet Camaro VI · Facelift 2018
Car comparison
Chevrolet Camaro VI · Facelift 2018 2.0 TvsVolkswagen Teramont X 2.5T V6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolkswagen Teramont X
2.5T V6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Chevrolet Camaro VI Facelift 2018 2.0 T
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.9 s
- Fastest top speed250 km/h155 mph Unrestricted240 km/h149 mph Restricted
- Lightest1,512 kg3,333 lb
- Best power-to-weight182 hp/t136 kW/t5.5 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.4 L/100 km25.0 mpg US30.1 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption10.7 L/100 km22.0 mpg US26.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.6 L/100 km30.9 mpg US37.2 mpg UK
- Best estimated range766 km476 mi
- Best performance score62/100
- Best economy score82/100
Volkswagen Teramont X 2.5T V6
- Most powerful299 hp223 kW
- Highest torque500 Nm369 lb-ft
- Largest trunk509 L
- Best overall score61/100
- Best practicality score72/100
Specification comparison
| Model | ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20182.0 T | VolkswagenTeramont X2.5T V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 275hp205kW | 299hp223kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 500Nm369lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,512kg3,333lb | 2,130kg4,696lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 82.0s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph Calculated | 94.9s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.9s | 7.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 23.3s Calculated | 46.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.6s Calculated | 6.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.4L/100 km25mpg US30.1mpg UK | 9.8L/100 km24mpg US28.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 10.7L/100 km22mpg US26.4mpg UK | 12.8L/100 km18.4mpg US22.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK | 8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.1s Calculated | 15.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 182hp/t136kW/t82hp/1000 lb Calculated | 140hp/t105kW/t64hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 265Nm/t177lb-ft/ton Calculated | 235Nm/t157lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 766km476mi Calculated | 714km444mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,998cc122cu in | 2,492cc152cu in |
| Length | 4,784mm188in | 4,905mm193in |
| Width | 1,897mm75in | 1,989mm78in |
| Height | 1,348mm53in | 1,719mm68in |
| Wheelbase | 2,811mm111in | 2,980mm117in |
| Front track | 1,588mm63in | - |
| Rear track | 1,618mm64in | - |
| Trunk volume | 258L | 509L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,719L |
| Doors | 2 | 5 |
| Seats | 4 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 72L | 70L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Chevrolet Camaro VI Facelift 2018 2.0 T: Power / Torque
- Volkswagen Teramont X 2.5T V6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20182.0 T | 5,600 rpm | 3,000-4,500 rpm | 5,850 rpm |
| VolkswagenTeramont X2.5T V6 | 6,000 rpm | 2,750-3,500 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20182.0 T | VolkswagenTeramont X2.5T V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.6 s | 6.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.9 s | 7.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 23.3 s | 46.8 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.1 s | 6.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.1 s | 9.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.8 s | 12.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.1 s | 15.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 163 km/h 101 mph | 145 km/h 90 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20182.0 T | 275 hp 205 kW |
| VolkswagenTeramont X2.5T V6 | 299 hp 223 kW |
Volkswagen Teramont X 2.5T V6 has 24 hp more than Chevrolet Camaro VI Facelift 2018 2.0 T.
The biggest power difference is between Chevrolet Camaro VI Facelift 2018 2.0 T and Volkswagen Teramont X 2.5T V6: 24 hp (18 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20182.0 T | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| VolkswagenTeramont X2.5T V6 | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20182.0 T | 1,512 kg 3,333 lb |
| VolkswagenTeramont X2.5T V6 | 2,130 kg 4,696 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20182.0 T | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
| VolkswagenTeramont X2.5T V6 | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20182.0 T | 5.9 s |
| VolkswagenTeramont X2.5T V6 | 7.2 s |
Although Volkswagen Teramont X 2.5T V6 has more power, Chevrolet Camaro VI Facelift 2018 2.0 T is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Chevrolet Camaro VI Facelift 2018 2.0 T and Volkswagen Teramont X 2.5T V6: 1.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20182.0 T | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenTeramont X2.5T V6 | 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20182.0 T | 182 hp/t 136 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp |
| VolkswagenTeramont X2.5T V6 | 140 hp/t 105 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20182.0 T | 766 km 476 mi |
| VolkswagenTeramont X2.5T V6 | 714 km 444 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20182.0 T | 275 hp 205 kW | 5.9 s | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
| VolkswagenTeramont X2.5T V6 | 299 hp 223 kW | 7.2 s | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20182.0 T |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolkswagenTeramont X2.5T V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20182.0 T |
| 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolkswagenTeramont X2.5T V6 |
| 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK | ||||||
Chevrolet Camaro VI Facelift 2018 2.0 T is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20182.0 T | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | 5.9 s |
| VolkswagenTeramont X2.5T V6 | 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK | 7.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20182.0 T | 182 hp/t 136 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenTeramont X2.5T V6 | 140 hp/t 105 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp | 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20182.0 T | VolkswagenTeramont X2.5T V6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 275 hp 205 kW | 299 hp 223 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.9 s | 7.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,512 kg 3,333 lb | 2,130 kg 4,696 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 766 km 476 mi | 714 km 444 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 258 L 9.1 cu ft | 509 L 18.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 182 hp/t 136 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp | 140 hp/t 105 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Chevrolet Camaro VI Facelift 2018 2.0 T | Volkswagen Teramont X 2.5T V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.4 L/100 km25 mpg US30.1 mpg UK | 9.8 L/100 km24 mpg US28.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 16.45 LC100 km | 17.15 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 26.47 LC100 mi | 27.60 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,410 L372 US gal310 UK gal | 1,470 L388 US gal323 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,468 LC/year | 2,573 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Chevrolet Camaro VI Facelift 2018 2.0 T
- Is 618 kg lighter
- Is 1.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 35 km/h (22 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 42 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 52 km (32 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Volkswagen Teramont X 2.5T V6
- Has 24 hp more
- Has 100 Nm more
- Has 251 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























