Car comparison

Qvale Mangusta 4.6 i V8 32VvsChevrolet Camaro IV · Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Qvale Mangusta

4.6 i V8 32V

322 hp4601 ccGasolineManualNaturally aspiratedCabriolet / convertible1999-2002
VS

Chevrolet Camaro IV · Facelift 1998

Z28 5.7 i V8

310 hp5665 ccGasolineRWDManualNaturally aspiratedCabriolet / convertible2001-2002

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Chevrolet Camaro IV Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    5.5 s
  • Highest torque
    472 Nm
    348 lb-ft
  • Lowest city consumption
    13.8 L/100 km
    17.0 mpg US
    20.5 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    9.0 L/100 km
    26.1 mpg US
    31.4 mpg UK
  • Best overall score
    58/100
  • Best economy score
    75/100
  • Best practicality score
    42/100

Qvale Mangusta 4.6 i V8 32V

  • Fastest top speed
    270 km/h
    168 mph Unrestricted
    260 km/h
    162 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    322 hp
    240 kW
  • Lightest
    1,400 kg
    3,086 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    230 hp/t
    172 kW/t
    4.3 kg/hp
  • Best performance score
    68/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelQvaleMangusta4.6 i V8 32VChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8
Power
322hp240kW
310hp231kW
Torque
425Nm313lb-ft
472Nm348lb-ft
Curb weight
1,400kg3,086lb
1,605kg3,538lb
Gross weight
1,670kg3,682lb
1,930kg4,255lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
270 km/h168 mph
Restricted
260 km/h162 mph
Calculated
254 km/h
158 mph
To 99% top speed
77.1s99% target: 267 km/h / 166 mph
Calculated
78.2s99% target: 251 km/h / 156 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
5.8s
5.5s
0-200 km/h
19.4s
Calculated
21.2s
Calculated
0-60 mph
5.5s
Calculated
5.2s
Calculated
Fuel consumption-
11.8L/100 km19.9mpg US23.9mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
21.3L/100 km11mpg US13.3mpg UK
13.8L/100 km17mpg US20.5mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
11.4L/100 km20.6mpg US24.8mpg UK
9L/100 km26.1mpg US31.4mpg UK
Quarter mile
13.8s
Calculated
13.7s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
230hp/t172kW/t104hp/1000 lb
Calculated
193hp/t144kW/t88hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
304Nm/t203lb-ft/ton
Calculated
294Nm/t197lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range-
538km334mi
Calculated
Displacement
4,601cc281cu in
5,665cc346cu in
Length
4,190mm165in
4,914mm193in
Width
1,900mm75in
1,882mm74in
Height
1,270mm50in
1,315mm52in
Wheelbase
2,670mm105in
2,568mm101in
Front track
1,590mm63in
1,542mm61in
Rear track
1,590mm63in
1,540mm61in
Trunk volume-
215L
Max trunk volume-
930L
Doors
2
2
Seats
2
4
Fuel tank
80L
64L
CO2 emissions-
278g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Qvale Mangusta 4.6 i V8 32VChevrolet Camaro IV Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8PowerTorque
  • Qvale Mangusta 4.6 i V8 32V: Power / Torque
  • Chevrolet Camaro IV Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
QvaleMangusta4.6 i V8 32V6,000 rpm4,800 rpm6,250 rpm
ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V85,200 rpm4,000 rpm5,450 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricQvaleMangusta4.6 i V8 32VChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
5.5 s
5.2 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
5.8 s
5.5 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
19.4 s
21.2 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
270 km/h168 mph
Restricted
260 km/h162 mph
Likely limited
254 km/h
158 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.4 s
2.2 s
330 ft
101 m
6.1 s
5.9 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.1 s
8.9 s
1000 ft
305 m
11.7 s
11.5 s
1/4 mile
402 m
13.8 s
13.7 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
171 km/h
106 mph
167 km/h
104 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
QvaleMangusta4.6 i V8 32V
322 hp
240 kW
ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8
310 hp
231 kW

Qvale Mangusta 4.6 i V8 32V has 12 hp more than Chevrolet Camaro IV Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8.

The biggest power difference is between Chevrolet Camaro IV Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8 and Qvale Mangusta 4.6 i V8 32V: 12 hp (9 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
QvaleMangusta4.6 i V8 32V
425 Nm
313 lb-ft
ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8
472 Nm
348 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
QvaleMangusta4.6 i V8 32V
1,400 kg
3,086 lb
ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8
1,605 kg
3,538 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
QvaleMangusta4.6 i V8 32V
Unrestricted
270 km/h168 mph
Restricted
260 km/h162 mph
ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8
254 km/h
158 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Although Qvale Mangusta 4.6 i V8 32V has more power, Chevrolet Camaro IV Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Chevrolet Camaro IV Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8 and Qvale Mangusta 4.6 i V8 32V: 0.3 s.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
QvaleMangusta4.6 i V8 32V
230 hp/t
172 kW/t
4.3 kg/hp
ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8
193 hp/t
144 kW/t
5.2 kg/hp

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
QvaleMangusta4.6 i V8 32V
322 hp
240 kW
5.8 s
Unrestricted
270 km/h168 mph
Restricted
260 km/h162 mph
ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8
310 hp
231 kW
5.5 s
254 km/h
158 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
QvaleMangusta4.6 i V8 32V
Power
322 hp
240 kW
0-100 km/h5.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
270 km/h168 mph
Restricted
260 km/h162 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,190 mm
165.0 in
Height
1,270 mm
50.0 in
ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8
Power
310 hp
231 kW
0-100 km/h5.5 s
Top speed
254 km/h
158 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
215 L
7.6 cu ft
Length
4,914 mm
193.5 in
Height
1,315 mm
51.8 in

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleQvaleMangusta4.6 i V8 32VChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8
Power
322 hp
240 kW
310 hp
231 kW
Torque
425 Nm
313 lb-ft
472 Nm
348 lb-ft
Acceleration
5.8 s
5.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
270 km/h168 mph
Restricted
260 km/h162 mph
254 km/h
158 mph
Lightness
1,400 kg
3,086 lb
1,605 kg
3,538 lb
Fuel consumption
-
11.8 L/100 km
19.9 mpg US
23.9 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,190 mm
165.0 in
Height
1,270 mm
50.0 in
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
215 L
7.6 cu ft
Length
4,914 mm
193.5 in
Height
1,315 mm
51.8 in
Range score
-
538 km
334 mi
CO2 score
-
278 g/km
Trunk score
-
215 L
7.6 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
230 hp/t
172 kW/t
4.3 kg/hp
193 hp/t
144 kW/t
5.2 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleChevrolet Camaro IV Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8
Consumption11.8 L/100 km19.9 mpg US23.9 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km20.65 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi33.23 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,770 L468 US gal389 UK gal
Annual fuel cost3,098 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Qvale Mangusta 4.6 i V8 32V

  • Has 12 hp more
  • Is 205 kg lighter
  • Has 16 km/h (10 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 37 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Qvale Mangusta 4.6 i V8 32V
Chevrolet Camaro IV Z28 5.7 i V8
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Qvale Mangusta 4.6 i V8 32V vs Chevrolet Camaro IV · Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8 - car comparison - FastVsFaster