Qvale Mangusta
Car comparison
Qvale Mangusta 4.6 i V8 32VvsChevrolet Camaro IV · Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonChevrolet Camaro IV · Facelift 1998
Z28 5.7 i V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Chevrolet Camaro IV Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.5 s
- Highest torque472 Nm348 lb-ft
- Lowest city consumption13.8 L/100 km17.0 mpg US20.5 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption9.0 L/100 km26.1 mpg US31.4 mpg UK
- Best overall score58/100
- Best economy score75/100
- Best practicality score42/100
Qvale Mangusta 4.6 i V8 32V
- Fastest top speed270 km/h168 mph Unrestricted260 km/h162 mph Restricted
- Most powerful322 hp240 kW
- Lightest1,400 kg3,086 lb
- Best power-to-weight230 hp/t172 kW/t4.3 kg/hp
- Best performance score68/100
Specification comparison
| Model | QvaleMangusta4.6 i V8 32V | ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 322hp240kW | 310hp231kW |
| Torque | 425Nm313lb-ft | 472Nm348lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,400kg3,086lb | 1,605kg3,538lb |
| Gross weight | 1,670kg3,682lb | 1,930kg4,255lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 270 km/h168 mph Restricted 260 km/h162 mph Calculated | 254 km/h 158 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 77.1s99% target: 267 km/h / 166 mph Calculated | 78.2s99% target: 251 km/h / 156 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.8s | 5.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 19.4s Calculated | 21.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.5s Calculated | 5.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 11.8L/100 km19.9mpg US23.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 21.3L/100 km11mpg US13.3mpg UK | 13.8L/100 km17mpg US20.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 11.4L/100 km20.6mpg US24.8mpg UK | 9L/100 km26.1mpg US31.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.8s Calculated | 13.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 230hp/t172kW/t104hp/1000 lb Calculated | 193hp/t144kW/t88hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 304Nm/t203lb-ft/ton Calculated | 294Nm/t197lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 538km334mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 4,601cc281cu in | 5,665cc346cu in |
| Length | 4,190mm165in | 4,914mm193in |
| Width | 1,900mm75in | 1,882mm74in |
| Height | 1,270mm50in | 1,315mm52in |
| Wheelbase | 2,670mm105in | 2,568mm101in |
| Front track | 1,590mm63in | 1,542mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,590mm63in | 1,540mm61in |
| Trunk volume | - | 215L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 930L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 80L | 64L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 278g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Qvale Mangusta 4.6 i V8 32V: Power / Torque
- Chevrolet Camaro IV Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| QvaleMangusta4.6 i V8 32V | 6,000 rpm | 4,800 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8 | 5,200 rpm | 4,000 rpm | 5,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | QvaleMangusta4.6 i V8 32V | ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.5 s | 5.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.8 s | 5.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 19.4 s | 21.2 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 270 km/h168 mph Restricted 260 km/h162 mph Likely limited | 254 km/h 158 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.1 s | 5.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.1 s | 8.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.7 s | 11.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.8 s | 13.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 171 km/h 106 mph | 167 km/h 104 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| QvaleMangusta4.6 i V8 32V | 322 hp 240 kW |
| ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8 | 310 hp 231 kW |
Qvale Mangusta 4.6 i V8 32V has 12 hp more than Chevrolet Camaro IV Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8.
The biggest power difference is between Chevrolet Camaro IV Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8 and Qvale Mangusta 4.6 i V8 32V: 12 hp (9 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| QvaleMangusta4.6 i V8 32V | 425 Nm 313 lb-ft |
| ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8 | 472 Nm 348 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| QvaleMangusta4.6 i V8 32V | 1,400 kg 3,086 lb |
| ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8 | 1,605 kg 3,538 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| QvaleMangusta4.6 i V8 32V | Unrestricted 270 km/h168 mph Restricted 260 km/h162 mph |
| ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8 | 254 km/h 158 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| QvaleMangusta4.6 i V8 32V | 5.8 s |
| ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8 | 5.5 s |
Although Qvale Mangusta 4.6 i V8 32V has more power, Chevrolet Camaro IV Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Chevrolet Camaro IV Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8 and Qvale Mangusta 4.6 i V8 32V: 0.3 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| QvaleMangusta4.6 i V8 32V | 230 hp/t 172 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp |
| ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8 | 193 hp/t 144 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| QvaleMangusta4.6 i V8 32V | 322 hp 240 kW | 5.8 s | Unrestricted 270 km/h168 mph Restricted 260 km/h162 mph |
| ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8 | 310 hp 231 kW | 5.5 s | 254 km/h 158 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QvaleMangusta4.6 i V8 32V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | QvaleMangusta4.6 i V8 32V | ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 322 hp 240 kW | 310 hp 231 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 425 Nm 313 lb-ft | 472 Nm 348 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.8 s | 5.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 270 km/h168 mph Restricted 260 km/h162 mph | 254 km/h 158 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,400 kg 3,086 lb | 1,605 kg 3,538 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 11.8 L/100 km 19.9 mpg US 23.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 538 km 334 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 278 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | - | 215 L 7.6 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 230 hp/t 172 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | 193 hp/t 144 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Chevrolet Camaro IV Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 11.8 L/100 km19.9 mpg US23.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 20.65 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 33.23 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,770 L468 US gal389 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,098 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Qvale Mangusta 4.6 i V8 32V
- Has 12 hp more
- Is 205 kg lighter
- Has 16 km/h (10 mph) higher top speed
- Has 37 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
Chevrolet Camaro IV Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8
- Has 47 Nm more
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest torque
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























