Car comparison

Qvale Mangusta 4.6 i V8 32VvsBMW M3 Convertible (E36) 3.2

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Qvale Mangusta

4.6 i V8 32V

322 hp4601 ccGasolineManualNaturally aspiratedCabriolet / convertible1999-2002
VS

BMW M3 Convertible (E36)

3.2

321 hp3201 ccGasolineRWDManualNaturally aspiratedCabriolet / convertible1995-1999

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Qvale Mangusta 4.6 i V8 32V

  • Fastest top speed
    270 km/h
    168 mph Unrestricted
    260 km/h
    162 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    322 hp
    240 kW
  • Highest torque
    425 Nm
    313 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,400 kg
    3,086 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    230 hp/t
    172 kW/t
    4.3 kg/hp
  • Best overall score
    57/100
  • Best performance score
    68/100

BMW M3 Convertible (E36) 3.2

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    5.6 s
  • Lowest city consumption
    17.0 L/100 km
    13.8 mpg US
    16.6 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    7.7 L/100 km
    30.5 mpg US
    36.7 mpg UK
  • Best economy score
    77/100
  • Best practicality score
    42/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelQvaleMangusta4.6 i V8 32VBMWM3 Convertible (E36)3.2
Power
322hp240kW
321hp239kW
Torque
425Nm313lb-ft
350Nm258lb-ft
Curb weight
1,400kg3,086lb
1,560kg3,439lb
Gross weight
1,670kg3,682lb
1,980kg4,365lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
270 km/h168 mph
Restricted
260 km/h162 mph
Calculated
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
76.8s99% target: 267 km/h / 166 mph
Calculated
75.1s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
5.8s
5.6s
0-200 km/h
19.3s
Calculated
20.1s
Calculated
0-60 mph
5.5s
Calculated
5.3s
Calculated
Fuel consumption-
11.1L/100 km21.2mpg US25.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
21.3L/100 km11mpg US13.3mpg UK
17L/100 km13.8mpg US16.6mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
11.4L/100 km20.6mpg US24.8mpg UK
7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK
Quarter mile
13.8s
Calculated
13.7s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
230hp/t172kW/t104hp/1000 lb
Calculated
206hp/t153kW/t93hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
304Nm/t203lb-ft/ton
Calculated
224Nm/t150lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range-
559km347mi
Calculated
Displacement
4,601cc281cu in
3,201cc195cu in
Length
4,190mm165in
4,433mm175in
Width
1,900mm75in
1,710mm67in
Height
1,270mm50in
1,340mm53in
Wheelbase
2,670mm105in
2,700mm106in
Front track
1,590mm63in
1,422mm56in
Rear track
1,590mm63in
1,444mm57in
Trunk volume-
230L
Doors
2
2
Seats
2
4
Fuel tank
80L
62L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Qvale Mangusta 4.6 i V8 32VBMW M3 Convertible (E36) 3.2PowerTorque
  • Qvale Mangusta 4.6 i V8 32V: Power / Torque
  • BMW M3 Convertible (E36) 3.2: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
QvaleMangusta4.6 i V8 32V6,000 rpm4,800 rpm6,250 rpm
BMWM3 Convertible (E36)3.27,400 rpm3,250 rpm7,650 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricQvaleMangusta4.6 i V8 32VBMWM3 Convertible (E36)3.2
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
5.5 s
5.3 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
5.8 s
5.6 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
19.3 s
20.1 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
270 km/h168 mph
Restricted
260 km/h162 mph
Likely limited
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.4 s
2.3 s
330 ft
101 m
6.1 s
6.0 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.1 s
9.0 s
1000 ft
305 m
11.7 s
11.6 s
1/4 mile
402 m
13.8 s
13.7 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
171 km/h
106 mph
169 km/h
105 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
QvaleMangusta4.6 i V8 32V
322 hp
240 kW
BMWM3 Convertible (E36)3.2
321 hp
239 kW

Qvale Mangusta 4.6 i V8 32V has 1 hp more than BMW M3 Convertible (E36) 3.2.

The biggest power difference is between BMW M3 Convertible (E36) 3.2 and Qvale Mangusta 4.6 i V8 32V: 1 hp (1 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
QvaleMangusta4.6 i V8 32V
425 Nm
313 lb-ft
BMWM3 Convertible (E36)3.2
350 Nm
258 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
QvaleMangusta4.6 i V8 32V
1,400 kg
3,086 lb
BMWM3 Convertible (E36)3.2
1,560 kg
3,439 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
QvaleMangusta4.6 i V8 32V
Unrestricted
270 km/h168 mph
Restricted
260 km/h162 mph
BMWM3 Convertible (E36)3.2
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
QvaleMangusta4.6 i V8 32V5.8 s
BMWM3 Convertible (E36)3.25.6 s

Although Qvale Mangusta 4.6 i V8 32V has more power, BMW M3 Convertible (E36) 3.2 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW M3 Convertible (E36) 3.2 and Qvale Mangusta 4.6 i V8 32V: 0.2 s.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
QvaleMangusta4.6 i V8 32V
230 hp/t
172 kW/t
4.3 kg/hp
BMWM3 Convertible (E36)3.2
206 hp/t
153 kW/t
4.9 kg/hp

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
QvaleMangusta4.6 i V8 32V
322 hp
240 kW
5.8 s
Unrestricted
270 km/h168 mph
Restricted
260 km/h162 mph
BMWM3 Convertible (E36)3.2
321 hp
239 kW
5.6 s
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
QvaleMangusta4.6 i V8 32V
Power
322 hp
240 kW
0-100 km/h5.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
270 km/h168 mph
Restricted
260 km/h162 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,190 mm
165.0 in
Height
1,270 mm
50.0 in
BMWM3 Convertible (E36)3.2
Power
321 hp
239 kW
0-100 km/h5.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
230 L
8.1 cu ft
Length
4,433 mm
174.5 in
Height
1,340 mm
52.8 in

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleQvaleMangusta4.6 i V8 32VBMWM3 Convertible (E36)3.2
Power
322 hp
240 kW
321 hp
239 kW
Torque
425 Nm
313 lb-ft
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
Acceleration
5.8 s
5.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
270 km/h168 mph
Restricted
260 km/h162 mph
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Lightness
1,400 kg
3,086 lb
1,560 kg
3,439 lb
Fuel consumption
-
11.1 L/100 km
21.2 mpg US
25.4 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,190 mm
165.0 in
Height
1,270 mm
50.0 in
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
230 L
8.1 cu ft
Length
4,433 mm
174.5 in
Height
1,340 mm
52.8 in
Range score
-
559 km
347 mi
Trunk score
-
230 L
8.1 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
230 hp/t
172 kW/t
4.3 kg/hp
206 hp/t
153 kW/t
4.9 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleBMW M3 Convertible (E36) 3.2
Consumption11.1 L/100 km21.2 mpg US25.4 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km19.43 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi31.26 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,665 L440 US gal366 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,914 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Qvale Mangusta 4.6 i V8 32V

  • Has 1 hp more
  • Has 75 Nm more
  • Is 160 kg lighter
  • Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 24 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h

BMW M3 Convertible (E36) 3.2

  • Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Qvale Mangusta 4.6 i V8 32V
BMW M3 Convertible (E36) 3.2
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

4.6 i V8 32V
AMG CLK 55 V8
VS
QvaleMangusta4.6 i V8 32VvsMercedes-BenzCLK (A208)Facelift 1999AMG CLK 55 V8
3.2
3.2i 24V
VS
BMWM3 Convertible (E36)3.2vsBMWM3 Convertible (E46)3.2i 24V
4.6 i V8 32V
Z28 5.7 i V8
VS
QvaleMangusta4.6 i V8 32VvsChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8
3.2
3.2
VS
BMWM3 Convertible (E36)3.2vsBMWM3 Coupe (E36)3.2
3.2
3.2
VS
BMWM3 Convertible (E36)3.2vsBMWM3 (E36)3.2
4.6 i V8 32V
645Ci
VS
QvaleMangusta4.6 i V8 32VvsBMW6 Series Convertible (E64)645Ci
3.2
3.2i 24V
VS
BMWM3 Convertible (E36)3.2vsBMWM3 Coupe (E46)3.2i 24V
4.6 i V8 32V
CLK 500
VS
QvaleMangusta4.6 i V8 32VvsMercedes-BenzCLK (A209)CLK 500
3.2
4.0 V8
VS
BMWM3 Convertible (E36)3.2vsBMWM3 Convertible (E93)4.0 V8
4.6 i V8 32V
6.7 i V8
VS
QvaleMangusta4.6 i V8 32VvsBentleyAzure6.7 i V8
3.2
2.3
VS
BMWM3 Convertible (E36)3.2vsBMWM3 Convertible (E30)2.3
4.6 i V8 32V
4.9
VS
QvaleMangusta4.6 i V8 32VvsBMWZ8 (E52)4.9
Qvale Mangusta 4.6 i V8 32V vs BMW M3 Convertible (E36) 3.2 - car comparison - FastVsFaster