Car comparison

Qvale Mangusta 4.6 i V8 32VvsBMW Z8 (E52) 4.9

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Qvale Mangusta

4.6 i V8 32V

322 hp4601 ccGasolineManualNaturally aspiratedCabriolet / convertible1999-2002
VS

BMW Z8 (E52)

4.9

400 hp4941 ccGasolineRWDManualNaturally aspiratedCabriolet / convertible2000-2005

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

BMW Z8 (E52) 4.9

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    4.7 s
  • Most powerful
    400 hp
    298 kW
  • Highest torque
    500 Nm
    369 lb-ft
  • Best power-to-weight
    241 hp/t
    180 kW/t
    4.2 kg/hp
  • Lowest city consumption
    21.1 L/100 km
    11.1 mpg US
    13.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    10.6 L/100 km
    22.2 mpg US
    26.6 mpg UK
  • Best overall score
    61/100
  • Best performance score
    74/100
  • Best economy score
    68/100

Qvale Mangusta 4.6 i V8 32V

  • Fastest top speed
    270 km/h
    168 mph Unrestricted
    260 km/h
    162 mph Restricted
  • Lightest
    1,400 kg
    3,086 lb
  • Best practicality score
    35/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelQvaleMangusta4.6 i V8 32VBMWZ8 (E52)4.9
Power
322hp240kW
400hp298kW
Torque
425Nm313lb-ft
500Nm369lb-ft
Curb weight
1,400kg3,086lb
1,660kg3,660lb
Gross weight
1,670kg3,682lb
1,900kg4,189lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
270 km/h168 mph
Restricted
260 km/h162 mph
Calculated
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
76.8s99% target: 267 km/h / 166 mph
Calculated
59.2s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
5.8s
4.7s
0-200 km/h
19.3s
Calculated
16.3s
Calculated
0-60 mph
5.5s
Calculated
4.5s
Calculated
Fuel consumption-
14.5L/100 km16.2mpg US19.5mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
21.3L/100 km11mpg US13.3mpg UK
21.1L/100 km11.1mpg US13.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
11.4L/100 km20.6mpg US24.8mpg UK
10.6L/100 km22.2mpg US26.6mpg UK
Quarter mile
13.8s
Calculated
12.8s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
230hp/t172kW/t104hp/1000 lb
Calculated
241hp/t180kW/t109hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
304Nm/t203lb-ft/ton
Calculated
301Nm/t202lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range-
503km313mi
Calculated
Displacement
4,601cc281cu in
4,941cc302cu in
Length
4,190mm165in
4,400mm173in
Width
1,900mm75in
1,830mm72in
Height
1,270mm50in
1,317mm52in
Wheelbase
2,670mm105in
2,505mm99in
Front track
1,590mm63in
1,550mm61in
Rear track
1,590mm63in
1,570mm62in
Trunk volume-
203L
Doors
2
2
Seats
2
2
Fuel tank
80L
73L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Qvale Mangusta 4.6 i V8 32VBMW Z8 (E52) 4.9PowerTorque
  • Qvale Mangusta 4.6 i V8 32V: Power / Torque
  • BMW Z8 (E52) 4.9: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
QvaleMangusta4.6 i V8 32V6,000 rpm4,800 rpm6,250 rpm
BMWZ8 (E52)4.96,600 rpm3,800 rpm6,850 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricQvaleMangusta4.6 i V8 32VBMWZ8 (E52)4.9
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
5.5 s
4.5 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
5.8 s
4.7 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
19.3 s
16.3 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
270 km/h168 mph
Restricted
260 km/h162 mph
Likely limited
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.4 s
2.1 s
330 ft
101 m
6.1 s
5.6 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.1 s
8.4 s
1000 ft
305 m
11.7 s
10.8 s
1/4 mile
402 m
13.8 s
12.8 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
171 km/h
106 mph
180 km/h
112 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
QvaleMangusta4.6 i V8 32V
322 hp
240 kW
BMWZ8 (E52)4.9
400 hp
298 kW

BMW Z8 (E52) 4.9 has 78 hp more than Qvale Mangusta 4.6 i V8 32V.

The biggest power difference is between Qvale Mangusta 4.6 i V8 32V and BMW Z8 (E52) 4.9: 78 hp (58 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
QvaleMangusta4.6 i V8 32V
425 Nm
313 lb-ft
BMWZ8 (E52)4.9
500 Nm
369 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
QvaleMangusta4.6 i V8 32V
1,400 kg
3,086 lb
BMWZ8 (E52)4.9
1,660 kg
3,660 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
QvaleMangusta4.6 i V8 32V
Unrestricted
270 km/h168 mph
Restricted
260 km/h162 mph
BMWZ8 (E52)4.9
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
QvaleMangusta4.6 i V8 32V5.8 s
BMWZ8 (E52)4.94.7 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW Z8 (E52) 4.9 and Qvale Mangusta 4.6 i V8 32V: 1.1 s.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
QvaleMangusta4.6 i V8 32V
230 hp/t
172 kW/t
4.3 kg/hp
BMWZ8 (E52)4.9
241 hp/t
180 kW/t
4.1 kg/hp

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
QvaleMangusta4.6 i V8 32V
322 hp
240 kW
5.8 s
Unrestricted
270 km/h168 mph
Restricted
260 km/h162 mph
BMWZ8 (E52)4.9
400 hp
298 kW
4.7 s
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
QvaleMangusta4.6 i V8 32V
Power
322 hp
240 kW
0-100 km/h5.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
270 km/h168 mph
Restricted
260 km/h162 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,190 mm
165.0 in
Height
1,270 mm
50.0 in
BMWZ8 (E52)4.9
Power
400 hp
298 kW
0-100 km/h4.7 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
203 L
7.2 cu ft
Length
4,400 mm
173.2 in
Height
1,317 mm
51.9 in

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleQvaleMangusta4.6 i V8 32VBMWZ8 (E52)4.9
Power
322 hp
240 kW
400 hp
298 kW
Torque
425 Nm
313 lb-ft
500 Nm
369 lb-ft
Acceleration
5.8 s
4.7 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
270 km/h168 mph
Restricted
260 km/h162 mph
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Lightness
1,400 kg
3,086 lb
1,660 kg
3,660 lb
Fuel consumption
-
14.5 L/100 km
16.2 mpg US
19.5 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,190 mm
165.0 in
Height
1,270 mm
50.0 in
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
203 L
7.2 cu ft
Length
4,400 mm
173.2 in
Height
1,317 mm
51.9 in
Range score
-
503 km
313 mi
Trunk score
-
203 L
7.2 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
230 hp/t
172 kW/t
4.3 kg/hp
241 hp/t
180 kW/t
4.2 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleBMW Z8 (E52) 4.9
Consumption14.5 L/100 km16.2 mpg US19.5 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km25.38 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi40.84 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used2,175 L575 US gal478 UK gal
Annual fuel cost3,806 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Qvale Mangusta 4.6 i V8 32V

  • Is 260 kg lighter
  • Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Lightest

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power

BMW Z8 (E52) 4.9

  • Has 78 hp more
  • Has 75 Nm more
  • Is 1.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 11 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Qvale Mangusta 4.6 i V8 32V
BMW Z8 (E52) 4.9
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

4.6 i V8 32V
AMG CLK 55 V8
VS
QvaleMangusta4.6 i V8 32VvsMercedes-BenzCLK (A208)Facelift 1999AMG CLK 55 V8
4.9
3.2i 24V
VS
BMWZ8 (E52)4.9vsBMWM3 Convertible (E46)3.2i 24V
4.6 i V8 32V
Z28 5.7 i V8
VS
QvaleMangusta4.6 i V8 32VvsChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8
4.9
650i
VS
BMWZ8 (E52)4.9vsBMW6 Series Convertible (E64)650i
4.6 i V8 32V
3.2
VS
QvaleMangusta4.6 i V8 32VvsBMWM3 Convertible (E36)3.2
4.9
4.0 V8
VS
BMWZ8 (E52)4.9vsBMWM3 Convertible (E93)4.0 V8
4.9
650i
VS
BMWZ8 (E52)4.9vsBMW6 Series Convertible (E64)Facelift 2007650i
4.9
5.0 V10
VS
BMWZ8 (E52)4.9vsBMWM6 Convertible (E64)5.0 V10
4.6 i V8 32V
CLK 500
VS
QvaleMangusta4.6 i V8 32VvsMercedes-BenzCLK (A209)CLK 500
4.9
650i
VS
BMWZ8 (E52)4.9vsBMW6 Series Convertible (F12)650i
4.6 i V8 32V
6.7 i V8
VS
QvaleMangusta4.6 i V8 32VvsBentleyAzure6.7 i V8
4.9
360 Spider
VS
BMWZ8 (E52)4.9vsFerrari360 Modena Spider360 Spider
Qvale Mangusta 4.6 i V8 32V vs BMW Z8 (E52) 4.9 - car comparison - FastVsFaster