Qvale Mangusta
Car comparison
Qvale Mangusta 4.6 i V8 32VvsBMW M3 Convertible (E46) 3.2i 24V
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW M3 Convertible (E46)
3.2i 24V
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW M3 Convertible (E46) 3.2i 24V
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.5 s
- Most powerful343 hp256 kW
- Lowest city consumption17.9 L/100 km13.1 mpg US15.8 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption8.8 L/100 km26.7 mpg US32.1 mpg UK
- Best overall score59/100
- Best economy score74/100
- Best practicality score44/100
Qvale Mangusta 4.6 i V8 32V
- Fastest top speed270 km/h168 mph Unrestricted260 km/h162 mph Restricted
- Highest torque425 Nm313 lb-ft
- Lightest1,400 kg3,086 lb
- Best power-to-weight230 hp/t172 kW/t4.3 kg/hp
- Best performance score68/100
Specification comparison
| Model | QvaleMangusta4.6 i V8 32V | BMWM3 Convertible (E46)3.2i 24V |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 322hp240kW | 343hp256kW |
| Torque | 425Nm313lb-ft | 365Nm269lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,400kg3,086lb | 1,655kg3,649lb |
| Gross weight | 1,670kg3,682lb | 2,100kg4,630lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 270 km/h168 mph Restricted 260 km/h162 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 76.8s99% target: 267 km/h / 166 mph Calculated | 76.2s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.8s | 5.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 19.3s Calculated | 20.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.5s Calculated | 5.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 12.1L/100 km19.4mpg US23.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 21.3L/100 km11mpg US13.3mpg UK | 17.9L/100 km13.1mpg US15.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 11.4L/100 km20.6mpg US24.8mpg UK | 8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.8s Calculated | 13.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 230hp/t172kW/t104hp/1000 lb Calculated | 207hp/t155kW/t94hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 304Nm/t203lb-ft/ton Calculated | 221Nm/t148lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 521km324mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 4,601cc281cu in | 3,246cc198cu in |
| Length | 4,190mm165in | 4,492mm177in |
| Width | 1,900mm75in | 1,780mm70in |
| Height | 1,270mm50in | 1,363mm54in |
| Wheelbase | 2,670mm105in | 2,731mm108in |
| Front track | 1,590mm63in | 1,508mm59in |
| Rear track | 1,590mm63in | 1,525mm60in |
| Trunk volume | - | 300L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 80L | 63L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Qvale Mangusta 4.6 i V8 32V: Power / Torque
- BMW M3 Convertible (E46) 3.2i 24V: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| QvaleMangusta4.6 i V8 32V | 6,000 rpm | 4,800 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| BMWM3 Convertible (E46)3.2i 24V | 7,900 rpm | 4,900 rpm | 8,150 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | QvaleMangusta4.6 i V8 32V | BMWM3 Convertible (E46)3.2i 24V |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.5 s | 5.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.8 s | 5.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 19.3 s | 20.0 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 270 km/h168 mph Restricted 260 km/h162 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.1 s | 5.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.1 s | 8.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.7 s | 11.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.8 s | 13.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 171 km/h 106 mph | 170 km/h 105 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| QvaleMangusta4.6 i V8 32V | 322 hp 240 kW |
| BMWM3 Convertible (E46)3.2i 24V | 343 hp 256 kW |
BMW M3 Convertible (E46) 3.2i 24V has 21 hp more than Qvale Mangusta 4.6 i V8 32V.
The biggest power difference is between Qvale Mangusta 4.6 i V8 32V and BMW M3 Convertible (E46) 3.2i 24V: 21 hp (16 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| QvaleMangusta4.6 i V8 32V | 425 Nm 313 lb-ft |
| BMWM3 Convertible (E46)3.2i 24V | 365 Nm 269 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| QvaleMangusta4.6 i V8 32V | 1,400 kg 3,086 lb |
| BMWM3 Convertible (E46)3.2i 24V | 1,655 kg 3,649 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| QvaleMangusta4.6 i V8 32V | Unrestricted 270 km/h168 mph Restricted 260 km/h162 mph |
| BMWM3 Convertible (E46)3.2i 24V | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| QvaleMangusta4.6 i V8 32V | 5.8 s |
| BMWM3 Convertible (E46)3.2i 24V | 5.5 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW M3 Convertible (E46) 3.2i 24V and Qvale Mangusta 4.6 i V8 32V: 0.3 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| QvaleMangusta4.6 i V8 32V | 230 hp/t 172 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp |
| BMWM3 Convertible (E46)3.2i 24V | 207 hp/t 155 kW/t 4.8 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| QvaleMangusta4.6 i V8 32V | 322 hp 240 kW | 5.8 s | Unrestricted 270 km/h168 mph Restricted 260 km/h162 mph |
| BMWM3 Convertible (E46)3.2i 24V | 343 hp 256 kW | 5.5 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QvaleMangusta4.6 i V8 32V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWM3 Convertible (E46)3.2i 24V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | QvaleMangusta4.6 i V8 32V | BMWM3 Convertible (E46)3.2i 24V | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 322 hp 240 kW | 343 hp 256 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 425 Nm 313 lb-ft | 365 Nm 269 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.8 s | 5.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 270 km/h168 mph Restricted 260 km/h162 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,400 kg 3,086 lb | 1,655 kg 3,649 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 12.1 L/100 km 19.4 mpg US 23.3 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 521 km 324 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | - | 300 L 10.6 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 230 hp/t 172 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | 207 hp/t 155 kW/t 4.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW M3 Convertible (E46) 3.2i 24V |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 12.1 L/100 km19.4 mpg US23.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 21.18 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 34.08 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,815 L479 US gal399 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,176 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Qvale Mangusta 4.6 i V8 32V
- Has 60 Nm more
- Is 255 kg lighter
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Has 23 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
BMW M3 Convertible (E46) 3.2i 24V
- Has 21 hp more
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























