Mercedes-Benz CLK (A209)
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz CLK (A209) CLK 500vsChevrolet Camaro IV · Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonChevrolet Camaro IV · Facelift 1998
Z28 5.7 i V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Chevrolet Camaro IV Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.5 s
- Most powerful310 hp231 kW
- Highest torque472 Nm348 lb-ft
- Lightest1,605 kg3,538 lb
- Best power-to-weight193 hp/t144 kW/t5.2 kg/hp
- Lowest city consumption13.8 L/100 km17.0 mpg US20.5 mpg UK
- Best estimated range538 km334 mi
- Best performance score66/100
Mercedes-Benz CLK (A209) CLK 500
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Lowest combined fuel consumption11.6 L/100 km20.3 mpg US24.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption8.6 L/100 km27.4 mpg US32.8 mpg UK
- Largest trunk276 L
- Best overall score58/100
- Best economy score76/100
- Best practicality score44/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzCLK (A209)CLK 500 | ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 306hp228kW | 310hp231kW |
| Torque | 460Nm339lb-ft | 472Nm348lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,710kg3,770lb | 1,605kg3,538lb |
| Gross weight | 2,225kg4,905lb | 1,930kg4,255lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | 254 km/h 158 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 85.2s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 78.2s99% target: 251 km/h / 156 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.2s | 5.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 22.5s Calculated | 21.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.9s Calculated | 5.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 11.6L/100 km20.3mpg US24.4mpg UK | 11.8L/100 km19.9mpg US23.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 17.2L/100 km13.7mpg US16.4mpg UK | 13.8L/100 km17mpg US20.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.6L/100 km27.4mpg US32.8mpg UK | 9L/100 km26.1mpg US31.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.3s Calculated | 13.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 179hp/t133kW/t81hp/1000 lb Calculated | 193hp/t144kW/t88hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 269Nm/t180lb-ft/ton Calculated | 294Nm/t197lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 534km332mi Calculated | 538km334mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 4,966cc303cu in | 5,665cc346cu in |
| Length | 4,638mm183in | 4,914mm193in |
| Width | 1,740mm69in | 1,882mm74in |
| Height | 1,413mm56in | 1,315mm52in |
| Wheelbase | 2,715mm107in | 2,568mm101in |
| Front track | 1,497mm59in | 1,542mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,478mm58in | 1,540mm61in |
| Trunk volume | 276L | 215L |
| Max trunk volume | 390L | 930L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 62L | 64L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 278g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz CLK (A209) CLK 500: Power / Torque
- Chevrolet Camaro IV Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (A209)CLK 500 | 5,600 rpm | 2,700-4,250 rpm | 6,000 rpm |
| ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8 | 5,200 rpm | 4,000 rpm | 5,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzCLK (A209)CLK 500 | ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.9 s | 5.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.2 s | 5.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 22.5 s | 21.2 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited | 254 km/h 158 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.2 s | 5.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.4 s | 8.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.0 s | 11.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.3 s | 13.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 164 km/h 102 mph | 167 km/h 104 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (A209)CLK 500 | 306 hp 228 kW |
| ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8 | 310 hp 231 kW |
Chevrolet Camaro IV Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8 has 4 hp more than Mercedes-Benz CLK (A209) CLK 500.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz CLK (A209) CLK 500 and Chevrolet Camaro IV Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8: 4 hp (3 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (A209)CLK 500 | 460 Nm 339 lb-ft |
| ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8 | 472 Nm 348 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (A209)CLK 500 | 1,710 kg 3,770 lb |
| ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8 | 1,605 kg 3,538 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (A209)CLK 500 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8 | 254 km/h 158 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (A209)CLK 500 | 6.2 s |
| ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8 | 5.5 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Chevrolet Camaro IV Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8 and Mercedes-Benz CLK (A209) CLK 500: 0.7 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (A209)CLK 500 | 11.6 L/100 km 20.3 mpg US 24.4 mpg UK |
| ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8 | 11.8 L/100 km 19.9 mpg US 23.9 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (A209)CLK 500 | 179 hp/t 133 kW/t 5.6 kg/hp |
| ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8 | 193 hp/t 144 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (A209)CLK 500 | 534 km 332 mi |
| ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8 | 538 km 334 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (A209)CLK 500 | 306 hp 228 kW | 6.2 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8 | 310 hp 231 kW | 5.5 s | 254 km/h 158 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (A209)CLK 500 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (A209)CLK 500 |
| 11.6 L/100 km 20.3 mpg US 24.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8 |
| 11.8 L/100 km 19.9 mpg US 23.9 mpg UK | ||||||
Chevrolet Camaro IV Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (A209)CLK 500 | 11.6 L/100 km 20.3 mpg US 24.4 mpg UK | 6.2 s |
| ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8 | 11.8 L/100 km 19.9 mpg US 23.9 mpg UK | 5.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (A209)CLK 500 | 179 hp/t 133 kW/t 5.6 kg/hp | 11.6 L/100 km 20.3 mpg US 24.4 mpg UK |
| ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8 | 193 hp/t 144 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp | 11.8 L/100 km 19.9 mpg US 23.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzCLK (A209)CLK 500 | ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 306 hp 228 kW | 310 hp 231 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 460 Nm 339 lb-ft | 472 Nm 348 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.2 s | 5.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | 254 km/h 158 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,710 kg 3,770 lb | 1,605 kg 3,538 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 11.6 L/100 km 20.3 mpg US 24.4 mpg UK | 11.8 L/100 km 19.9 mpg US 23.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 534 km 332 mi | 538 km 334 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 278 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 276 L 9.7 cu ft | 215 L 7.6 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 179 hp/t 133 kW/t 5.6 kg/hp | 193 hp/t 144 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz CLK (A209) CLK 500 | Chevrolet Camaro IV Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 11.6 L/100 km20.3 mpg US24.4 mpg UK | 11.8 L/100 km19.9 mpg US23.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 20.30 LC100 km | 20.65 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 32.67 LC100 mi | 33.23 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,740 L460 US gal383 UK gal | 1,770 L468 US gal389 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,045 LC/year | 3,098 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz CLK (A209) CLK 500
- Has 6 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 61 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
Chevrolet Camaro IV Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8
- Has 4 hp more
- Has 12 Nm more
- Is 105 kg lighter
- Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 14 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 4 km (2 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























