Chevrolet Camaro VI · Facelift 2018
Car comparison
Chevrolet Camaro VI · Facelift 2018 2.0 TvsCaterham Project V 55 kWh
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonCaterham Project V
55 kWh
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Caterham Project V 55 kWh
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.5 s
- Lightest1,190 kg2,624 lb
- Best power-to-weight229 hp/t170 kW/t4.4 kg/hp
- Best overall score62/100
- Best performance score71/100
Chevrolet Camaro VI Facelift 2018 2.0 T
- Fastest top speed250 km/h155 mph Unrestricted240 km/h149 mph Restricted
- Most powerful275 hp205 kW
- Best economy score82/100
- Best practicality score46/100
Specification comparison
| Model | ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20182.0 T | CaterhamProject V55 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 275hp205kW | 272hp203kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | - |
| Curb weight | 1,512kg3,333lb | 1,190kg2,624lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 81.3s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph Calculated | 48.8s99% target: 243 km/h / 151 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.9s | 4.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 23.2s Calculated | 16.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.6s Calculated | 4.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.4L/100 km25mpg US30.1mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 10.7L/100 km22mpg US26.4mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 14.0s Calculated | 12.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 182hp/t136kW/t82hp/1000 lb Calculated | 229hp/t170kW/t104hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 265Nm/t177lb-ft/ton Calculated | - |
| Estimated range | 766km476mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 1,998cc122cu in | - |
| Length | 4,784mm188in | 4,255mm168in |
| Width | 1,897mm75in | 1,893mm75in |
| Height | 1,348mm53in | 1,226mm48in |
| Wheelbase | 2,811mm111in | - |
| Front track | 1,588mm63in | - |
| Rear track | 1,618mm64in | - |
| Trunk volume | 258L | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 3 |
| Fuel tank | 72L | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20182.0 T | CaterhamProject V55 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.6 s | 4.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.9 s | 4.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 23.2 s | 16.3 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.1 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.1 s | 5.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.2 s | 8.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.8 s | 10.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.0 s | 12.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 163 km/h 101 mph | 181 km/h 113 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20182.0 T | 275 hp 205 kW |
| CaterhamProject V55 kWh | 272 hp 203 kW |
Chevrolet Camaro VI Facelift 2018 2.0 T has 3 hp more than Caterham Project V 55 kWh.
The biggest power difference is between Caterham Project V 55 kWh and Chevrolet Camaro VI Facelift 2018 2.0 T: 3 hp (2 kW).
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20182.0 T | 1,512 kg 3,333 lb |
| CaterhamProject V55 kWh | 1,190 kg 2,624 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20182.0 T | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
| CaterhamProject V55 kWh | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20182.0 T | 5.9 s |
| CaterhamProject V55 kWh | 4.5 s |
Although Chevrolet Camaro VI Facelift 2018 2.0 T has more power, Caterham Project V 55 kWh is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Caterham Project V 55 kWh and Chevrolet Camaro VI Facelift 2018 2.0 T: 1.4 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20182.0 T | 182 hp/t 136 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp |
| CaterhamProject V55 kWh | 229 hp/t 170 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20182.0 T | 275 hp 205 kW | 5.9 s | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
| CaterhamProject V55 kWh | 272 hp 203 kW | 4.5 s | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20182.0 T |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| CaterhamProject V55 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20182.0 T | CaterhamProject V55 kWh | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 275 hp 205 kW | 272 hp 203 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.9 s | 4.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,512 kg 3,333 lb | 1,190 kg 2,624 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 766 km 476 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 258 L 9.1 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 182 hp/t 136 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp | 229 hp/t 170 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Chevrolet Camaro VI Facelift 2018 2.0 T |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.4 L/100 km25 mpg US30.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 16.45 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 26.47 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,410 L372 US gal310 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,468 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Chevrolet Camaro VI Facelift 2018 2.0 T
- Has 3 hp more
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
Caterham Project V 55 kWh
- Is 322 kg lighter
- Is 1.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 47 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























