Car comparison

Alpine A110 GTS 1.8vsCaterham Project V 55 kWh

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Alpine A110

GTS 1.8

300 hp1798 ccGasolineRWDDual-clutchTurbochargedCoupe2025-present
VS

Caterham Project V

55 kWh

272 hpElectricRWDAutomaticCoupe2025-present

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Alpine A110 GTS 1.8

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    4.2 s
  • Fastest top speed
    275 km/h
    171 mph Unrestricted
    260 km/h
    162 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    300 hp
    224 kW
  • Lightest
    1,145 kg
    2,524 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    262 hp/t
    195 kW/t
    3.8 kg/hp
  • Best performance score
    71/100
  • Best economy score
    88/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelAlpineA110GTS 1.8CaterhamProject V55 kWh
Power
300hp224kW
272hp203kW
Torque
340Nm251lb-ft
-
Curb weight
1,145kg2,524lb
1,190kg2,624lb
Gross weight
1,360kg2,998lb
-
Top speed
Unrestricted
275 km/h171 mph
Restricted
260 km/h162 mph
Calculated
Unrestricted
245 km/h152 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
52.2s99% target: 272 km/h / 169 mph
Calculated
48.8s99% target: 243 km/h / 151 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
4.2s
4.5s
0-200 km/h
13.2s
Calculated
16.3s
Calculated
0-60 mph
4.0s
Calculated
4.3s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK
-
Quarter mile
12.2s
Calculated
12.6s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
262hp/t195kW/t119hp/1000 lb
Calculated
229hp/t170kW/t104hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
297Nm/t199lb-ft/ton
Calculated
-
Estimated range
634km394mi
Calculated
-
Displacement
1,798cc110cu in
-
Length
4,181mm165in
4,255mm168in
Width
1,798mm71in
1,893mm75in
Height
1,248mm49in
1,226mm48in
Wheelbase
2,420mm95in
-
Ground clearance
116mm5in
-
Doors
2
2
Seats
2
3
Fuel tank
45L
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricAlpineA110GTS 1.8CaterhamProject V55 kWh
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
4.0 s
4.3 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
4.2 s
4.5 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
13.2 s
16.3 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
275 km/h171 mph
Restricted
260 km/h162 mph
Likely limited
Unrestricted
245 km/h152 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.1 s
2.1 s
330 ft
101 m
5.4 s
5.5 s
1/8 mile
201 m
8.0 s
8.2 s
1000 ft
305 m
10.3 s
10.6 s
1/4 mile
402 m
12.2 s
12.6 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
192 km/h
120 mph
181 km/h
113 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AlpineA110GTS 1.8
300 hp
224 kW
CaterhamProject V55 kWh
272 hp
203 kW

Alpine A110 GTS 1.8 has 28 hp more than Caterham Project V 55 kWh.

The biggest power difference is between Caterham Project V 55 kWh and Alpine A110 GTS 1.8: 28 hp (21 kW).

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AlpineA110GTS 1.8
1,145 kg
2,524 lb
CaterhamProject V55 kWh
1,190 kg
2,624 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AlpineA110GTS 1.8
Unrestricted
275 km/h171 mph
Restricted
260 km/h162 mph
CaterhamProject V55 kWh
Unrestricted
245 km/h152 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AlpineA110GTS 1.84.2 s
CaterhamProject V55 kWh4.5 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Alpine A110 GTS 1.8 and Caterham Project V 55 kWh: 0.3 s.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AlpineA110GTS 1.8
262 hp/t
195 kW/t
3.8 kg/hp
CaterhamProject V55 kWh
229 hp/t
170 kW/t
4.4 kg/hp

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
AlpineA110GTS 1.8
300 hp
224 kW
4.2 s
Unrestricted
275 km/h171 mph
Restricted
260 km/h162 mph
CaterhamProject V55 kWh
272 hp
203 kW
4.5 s
Unrestricted
245 km/h152 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
AlpineA110GTS 1.8
Power
300 hp
224 kW
0-100 km/h4.2 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
275 km/h171 mph
Restricted
260 km/h162 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,181 mm
164.6 in
Height
1,248 mm
49.1 in
CaterhamProject V55 kWh
Power
272 hp
203 kW
0-100 km/h4.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
245 km/h152 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
3 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,255 mm
167.5 in
Height
1,226 mm
48.3 in

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleAlpineA110GTS 1.8CaterhamProject V55 kWh
Power
300 hp
224 kW
272 hp
203 kW
Torque
340 Nm
251 lb-ft
-
Acceleration
4.2 s
4.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
275 km/h171 mph
Restricted
260 km/h162 mph
Unrestricted
245 km/h152 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Lightness
1,145 kg
2,524 lb
1,190 kg
2,624 lb
Fuel consumption
7.1 L/100 km
33.1 mpg US
39.8 mpg UK
-
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,181 mm
164.6 in
Height
1,248 mm
49.1 in
Doors/seats
2 doors
3 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,255 mm
167.5 in
Height
1,226 mm
48.3 in
Range score
634 km
394 mi
-
Power-to-weight score
262 hp/t
195 kW/t
3.8 kg/hp
229 hp/t
170 kW/t
4.4 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleAlpine A110 GTS 1.8
Consumption7.1 L/100 km33.1 mpg US39.8 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km12.42 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi20.00 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,065 L281 US gal234 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,864 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Alpine A110 GTS 1.8

  • Has 28 hp more
  • Is 45 kg lighter
  • Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 30 km/h (19 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 33 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Caterham Project V 55 kWh

No measurable advantages in the available data.

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Alpine A110 GTS 1.8
Caterham Project V 55 kWh
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

GTS 1.8
M235
VS
AlpineA110GTS 1.8vsBMW2 Series Gran Coupe (F74)M235
55 kWh
GTS Aero Kit 1.8
VS
CaterhamProject V55 kWhvsAlpineA110GTS Aero Kit 1.8
GTS 1.8
M235i
VS
AlpineA110GTS 1.8vsBMW2 Series Gran Coupe (F44)M235i
GTS 1.8
2.0 TFSI
VS
AlpineA110GTS 1.8vsAUDITTS Coupe (8S)Facelift 20182.0 TFSI
55 kWh
GLE 300d
VS
CaterhamProject V55 kWhvsMercedes-BenzGLE Coupe (C167)Facelift 2023GLE 300d
GTS 1.8
500h V6
VS
AlpineA110GTS 1.8vsLexusLC500h V6
55 kWh
430d
VS
CaterhamProject V55 kWhvsBMW4 Series Gran Coupe (G26)430d
GTS 1.8
3.0 V6
VS
AlpineA110GTS 1.8vsPorscheCayenne IIIFacelift 20233.0 V6
55 kWh
430d
VS
CaterhamProject V55 kWhvsBMW4 Series Coupe (G22)430d
GTS 1.8
M240i
VS
AlpineA110GTS 1.8vsBMW2 Series Coupe (G42)M240i
55 kWh
GLE 350d
VS
CaterhamProject V55 kWhvsMercedes-BenzGLE Coupe (C167)Facelift 2026GLE 350d
GTS 1.8
2.0
VS
AlpineA110GTS 1.8vsPorsche718 Cayman (982)2.0
Alpine A110 GTS 1.8 vs Caterham Project V 55 kWh - car comparison - FastVsFaster