Car comparison

Cadillac CTS II V 6.2 V8vsMaybach Landaulet 6.0 V12

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Cadillac CTS II

V 6.2 V8

564 hp6162 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticSuperchargedSedan2008-2014
VS

Maybach Landaulet

6.0 V12

612 hp5980 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticTwin-turboSedan2008-2012

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Cadillac CTS II V 6.2 V8

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    4.0 s
  • Fastest top speed
    282 km/h
    175 mph
  • Lightest
    1,930 kg
    4,255 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    292 hp/t
    218 kW/t
    3.4 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    14.7 L/100 km
    16.0 mpg US
    19.2 mpg UK
  • Best overall score
    82/100
  • Best performance score
    87/100
  • Best economy score
    67/100

Maybach Landaulet 6.0 V12

  • Most powerful
    612 hp
    456 kW
  • Highest torque
    1,000 Nm
    738 lb-ft
  • Best estimated range
    696 km
    433 mi
  • Largest trunk
    590 L
  • Best practicality score
    75/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelCadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8MaybachLandaulet6.0 V12
Power
564hp421kW
612hp456kW
Torque
747Nm551lb-ft
1,000Nm738lb-ft
Curb weight
1,930kg4,255lb
2,855kg6,294lb
Gross weight-
3,380kg7,452lb
Top speed
282 km/h
175 mph
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
41.4s99% target: 279 km/h / 173 mph
Calculated
53.1s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
4.0s
5.1s
0-200 km/h
11.2s
Calculated
15.6s
Calculated
0-60 mph
3.8s
Calculated
4.9s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
14.7L/100 km16mpg US19.2mpg UK
15.8L/100 km14.9mpg US17.9mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
16.8L/100 km14mpg US16.8mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption highway
12.4L/100 km19mpg US22.8mpg UK
-
Quarter mile
11.7s
Calculated
13.1s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
292hp/t218kW/t133hp/1000 lb
Calculated
214hp/t160kW/t97hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
387Nm/t259lb-ft/ton
Calculated
350Nm/t234lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
463km287mi
Calculated
696km433mi
Calculated
Displacement
6,162cc376cu in
5,980cc365cu in
Length
4,859mm191in
-
Width
1,842mm73in
-
Height
1,473mm58in
-
Wheelbase
2,880mm113in
-
Front track
1,575mm62in
-
Rear track
1,577mm62in
-
Trunk volume
385L
590L
Doors
4
4
Seats
5
4
Fuel tank
68L
110L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Cadillac CTS II V 6.2 V8Maybach Landaulet 6.0 V12PowerTorque
  • Cadillac CTS II V 6.2 V8: Power / Torque
  • Maybach Landaulet 6.0 V12: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V86,100 rpm3,800 rpm6,350 rpm
MaybachLandaulet6.0 V124,800-5,100 rpm2,000-4,000 rpm5,350 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricCadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8MaybachLandaulet6.0 V12
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
3.8 s
4.9 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
4.0 s
5.1 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
11.2 s
15.6 s
Top speed
282 km/h
175 mph
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.1 s
2.4 s
330 ft
101 m
5.3 s
5.9 s
1/8 mile
201 m
7.8 s
8.7 s
1000 ft
305 m
10.0 s
11.1 s
1/4 mile
402 m
11.7 s
13.1 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
205 km/h
127 mph
184 km/h
114 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8
564 hp
421 kW
MaybachLandaulet6.0 V12
612 hp
456 kW

Maybach Landaulet 6.0 V12 has 48 hp more than Cadillac CTS II V 6.2 V8.

The biggest power difference is between Cadillac CTS II V 6.2 V8 and Maybach Landaulet 6.0 V12: 48 hp (36 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8
747 Nm
551 lb-ft
MaybachLandaulet6.0 V12
1,000 Nm
738 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8
1,930 kg
4,255 lb
MaybachLandaulet6.0 V12
2,855 kg
6,294 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8
282 km/h
175 mph
MaybachLandaulet6.0 V12
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V84.0 s
MaybachLandaulet6.0 V125.1 s

Although Maybach Landaulet 6.0 V12 has more power, Cadillac CTS II V 6.2 V8 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Cadillac CTS II V 6.2 V8 and Maybach Landaulet 6.0 V12: 1.1 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8
14.7 L/100 km
16.0 mpg US
19.2 mpg UK
MaybachLandaulet6.0 V12
15.8 L/100 km
14.9 mpg US
17.9 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Cadillac CTS II V 6.2 V8 and Maybach Landaulet 6.0 V12: 1.1 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8
292 hp/t
218 kW/t
3.4 kg/hp
MaybachLandaulet6.0 V12
214 hp/t
160 kW/t
4.7 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8
463 km
287 mi
MaybachLandaulet6.0 V12
696 km
433 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8
564 hp
421 kW
4.0 s
282 km/h
175 mph
MaybachLandaulet6.0 V12
612 hp
456 kW
5.1 s
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8
Power
564 hp
421 kW
0-100 km/h4.0 s
Top speed
282 km/h
175 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
385 L
13.6 cu ft
Length
4,859 mm
191.3 in
Height
1,473 mm
58.0 in
MaybachLandaulet6.0 V12
Power
612 hp
456 kW
0-100 km/h5.1 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
4 seats
Trunk
590 L
20.8 cu ft
Length-
Height-

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8
Power
564 hp
421 kW
0-100 km/h4.0 s
Top speed
282 km/h
175 mph
14.7 L/100 km
16.0 mpg US
19.2 mpg UK
MaybachLandaulet6.0 V12
Power
612 hp
456 kW
0-100 km/h5.1 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
15.8 L/100 km
14.9 mpg US
17.9 mpg UK

Cadillac CTS II V 6.2 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8
14.7 L/100 km
16.0 mpg US
19.2 mpg UK
4.0 s
MaybachLandaulet6.0 V12
15.8 L/100 km
14.9 mpg US
17.9 mpg UK
5.1 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8
292 hp/t
218 kW/t
3.4 kg/hp
14.7 L/100 km
16.0 mpg US
19.2 mpg UK
MaybachLandaulet6.0 V12
214 hp/t
160 kW/t
4.7 kg/hp
15.8 L/100 km
14.9 mpg US
17.9 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleCadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8MaybachLandaulet6.0 V12
Power
564 hp
421 kW
612 hp
456 kW
Torque
747 Nm
551 lb-ft
1,000 Nm
738 lb-ft
Acceleration
4.0 s
5.1 s
Top speed
282 km/h
175 mph
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Lightness
1,930 kg
4,255 lb
2,855 kg
6,294 lb
Fuel consumption
14.7 L/100 km
16.0 mpg US
19.2 mpg UK
15.8 L/100 km
14.9 mpg US
17.9 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
385 L
13.6 cu ft
Length
4,859 mm
191.3 in
Height
1,473 mm
58.0 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
4 seats
Trunk
590 L
20.8 cu ft
Length-
Height-
Range score
463 km
287 mi
696 km
433 mi
Trunk score
385 L
13.6 cu ft
590 L
20.8 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
292 hp/t
218 kW/t
3.4 kg/hp
214 hp/t
160 kW/t
4.7 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleCadillac CTS II V 6.2 V8Maybach Landaulet 6.0 V12
Consumption14.7 L/100 km16 mpg US19.2 mpg UK15.8 L/100 km14.9 mpg US17.9 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km25.72 LC100 km27.65 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi41.40 LC100 mi44.50 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used2,205 L582 US gal485 UK gal2,370 L626 US gal521 UK gal
Annual fuel cost3,859 LC/year4,148 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Cadillac CTS II V 6.2 V8

  • Is 925 kg lighter
  • Is 1.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 17 km/h (11 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 1.1 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 78 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Smallest trunk

Maybach Landaulet 6.0 V12

  • Has 48 hp more
  • Has 253 Nm more
  • Has 234 km (145 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 205 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Cadillac CTS II V 6.2 V8
Maybach Landaulet 6.0 V12
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

V 6.2 V8
V 6.2 V8
VS
CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8vsCadillacCTS IIIV 6.2 V8
6.0 V12
Speed 6.0i W12
VS
MaybachLandaulet6.0 V12vsBentleyContinental Flying SpurSpeed 6.0i W12
V 6.2 V8
V 6.0 i V8
VS
CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8vsCadillacCTS IV 6.0 i V8
6.0 V12
760i
VS
MaybachLandaulet6.0 V12vsBMW7 Series (F01)760i
V 6.2 V8
AMG S 63 V8
VS
CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8vsMercedes-BenzS-class (W221)Facelift 2009AMG S 63 V8
V 6.2 V8
R 5.0 V8 Supercharged
VS
CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8vsJaguarXJ (X351)R 5.0 V8 Supercharged
6.0 V12
R 5.0 V8
VS
MaybachLandaulet6.0 V12vsJaguarXF (X250)R 5.0 V8
V 6.2 V8
AMG E 63 V8 BITURBO
VS
CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8vsMercedes-BenzE-class (W212)AMG E 63 V8 BITURBO
6.0 V12
V 6.2 V8
VS
MaybachLandaulet6.0 V12vsCadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8
V 6.2 V8
R-S 5.0 V8
VS
CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8vsJaguarXF (X250)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8
V 6.2 V8
V 3.6 V6
VS
CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8vsCadillacATS SedanV 3.6 V6
V 6.2 V8
AMG C 63 Performance Package V8
VS
CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8vsMercedes-BenzC-class (W204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 Performance Package V8
Cadillac CTS II V 6.2 V8 vs Maybach Landaulet 6.0 V12 - car comparison - FastVsFaster