Cadillac CTS II
Car comparison
Cadillac CTS II V 6.2 V8 · Stage 3vsCadillac CTS II V 6.2 V8 · Stage 2vsCadillac CTS II V 6.2 V8 · Stage 1vsCadillac CTS II V 6.2 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonCadillac CTS II
V 6.2 V8 (Stage 2)
Cadillac CTS II
V 6.2 V8 (Stage 1)
Cadillac CTS II
V 6.2 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Cadillac CTS II V 6.2 V8 (Stage 3) 801 hp
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.2 s
- Fastest top speed340 km/h211 mph Unrestricted325 km/h202 mph Restricted
- Most powerful801 hp597 kW
- Highest torque1,083 Nm799 lb-ft
- Lightest1,930 kg4,255 lb
- Best power-to-weight415 hp/t309 kW/t2.4 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption14.7 L/100 km16.0 mpg US19.2 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption16.8 L/100 km14.0 mpg US16.8 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption12.4 L/100 km19.0 mpg US22.8 mpg UK
- Best estimated range463 km287 mi
- Largest trunk385 L
- Best overall score85/100
- Best performance score92/100
- Best economy score67/100
- Best practicality score71/100
Specification comparison
| Model | CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8 (Stage 3)801 hp | CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8 (Stage 2)705 hp | CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8 (Stage 1)643 hp | CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8564 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 801hp597kW+237 hp | 705hp526kW+141 hp | 643hp479kW+79 hp | 564hp421kW |
| Torque | 1,083Nm799lb-ft+336 Nm | 956Nm705lb-ft+209 Nm | 867Nm639lb-ft+120 Nm | 747Nm551lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,930kg4,255lb | 1,930kg4,255lb | 1,930kg4,255lb | 1,930kg4,255lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 340 km/h211 mph Restricted 325 km/h202 mph Calculated | 313 km/h 194 mph | 305 km/h 190 mph | 282 km/h 175 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 38.2s99% target: 337 km/h / 209 mph-3.3 s Calculated | 37.6s99% target: 310 km/h / 193 mph-3.8 s Calculated | 39.6s99% target: 302 km/h / 188 mph-1.8 s Calculated | 41.4s99% target: 279 km/h / 173 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.2s-0.8 s | 3.5s-0.5 s | 3.7s-0.3 s | 4.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 7.9s-3.3 s Calculated | 8.9s-2.3 s Calculated | 9.6s-1.6 s Calculated | 11.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.1s-0.7 s Calculated | 3.4s-0.5 s Calculated | 3.5s-0.3 s Calculated | 3.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 14.7L/100 km16mpg US19.2mpg UK | 14.7L/100 km16mpg US19.2mpg UK | 14.7L/100 km16mpg US19.2mpg UK | 14.7L/100 km16mpg US19.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 16.8L/100 km14mpg US16.8mpg UK | 16.8L/100 km14mpg US16.8mpg UK | 16.8L/100 km14mpg US16.8mpg UK | 16.8L/100 km14mpg US16.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 12.4L/100 km19mpg US22.8mpg UK | 12.4L/100 km19mpg US22.8mpg UK | 12.4L/100 km19mpg US22.8mpg UK | 12.4L/100 km19mpg US22.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 10.4s-1.3 s Calculated | 10.9s-0.8 s Calculated | 11.2s-0.5 s Calculated | 11.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 415hp/t309kW/t188hp/1000 lb Calculated | 365hp/t272kW/t166hp/1000 lb Calculated | 333hp/t248kW/t151hp/1000 lb Calculated | 292hp/t218kW/t133hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 561Nm/t376lb-ft/ton Calculated | 495Nm/t331lb-ft/ton Calculated | 449Nm/t300lb-ft/ton Calculated | 387Nm/t259lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 463km287mi Calculated | 463km287mi Calculated | 463km287mi Calculated | 463km287mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 6,162cc376cu in | 6,162cc376cu in | 6,162cc376cu in | 6,162cc376cu in |
| Length | 4,859mm191in | 4,859mm191in | 4,859mm191in | 4,859mm191in |
| Width | 1,842mm73in | 1,842mm73in | 1,842mm73in | 1,842mm73in |
| Height | 1,473mm58in | 1,473mm58in | 1,473mm58in | 1,473mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,880mm113in | 2,880mm113in | 2,880mm113in | 2,880mm113in |
| Front track | 1,575mm62in | 1,575mm62in | 1,575mm62in | 1,575mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,577mm62in | 1,577mm62in | 1,577mm62in | 1,577mm62in |
| Trunk volume | 385L | 385L | 385L | 385L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 68L | 68L | 68L | 68L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Cadillac CTS II V 6.2 V8 (Stage 3) 801 hp: Power / Torque
- Cadillac CTS II V 6.2 V8 (Stage 2) 705 hp: Power / Torque
- Cadillac CTS II V 6.2 V8 (Stage 1) 643 hp: Power / Torque
- Cadillac CTS II V 6.2 V8 564 hp: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8 (Stage 3)801 hp | 6,100 rpm | 3,800 rpm | 6,350 rpm |
| CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8 (Stage 2)705 hp | 6,100 rpm | 3,800 rpm | 6,350 rpm |
| CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8 (Stage 1)643 hp | 6,100 rpm | 3,800 rpm | 6,350 rpm |
| CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8564 hp | 6,100 rpm | 3,800 rpm | 6,350 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8 (Stage 3)801 hp | CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8 (Stage 2)705 hp | CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8 (Stage 1)643 hp | CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8564 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.1 s | 3.4 s | 3.5 s | 3.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.2 s | 3.5 s | 3.7 s | 4.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 7.9 s | 8.9 s | 9.6 s | 11.2 s |
0-200 mph 0-322 km/h | 24.8 s | - | - | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 340 km/h211 mph Restricted 325 km/h202 mph Likely limited | 313 km/h 194 mph | 305 km/h 190 mph | 282 km/h 175 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||||
60 ft 18 m | 2.0 s | 2.1 s | 2.1 s | 2.1 s |
330 ft 101 m | 4.8 s | 5.0 s | 5.1 s | 5.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.0 s | 7.3 s | 7.5 s | 7.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 8.9 s | 9.3 s | 9.5 s | 10.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 10.4 s | 10.9 s | 11.2 s | 11.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 237 km/h 147 mph | 225 km/h 140 mph | 218 km/h 135 mph | 205 km/h 127 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8 (Stage 3)801 hp | 801 hp 597 kW |
| CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8 (Stage 2)705 hp | 705 hp 526 kW |
| CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8 (Stage 1)643 hp | 643 hp 479 kW |
| CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8564 hp | 564 hp 421 kW |
Cadillac CTS II V 6.2 V8 (Stage 3) 801 hp has 237 hp more than Cadillac CTS II V 6.2 V8 564 hp.
The biggest power difference is between Cadillac CTS II V 6.2 V8 564 hp and Cadillac CTS II V 6.2 V8 (Stage 3) 801 hp: 237 hp (177 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8 (Stage 3)801 hp | 1,083 Nm 799 lb-ft |
| CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8 (Stage 2)705 hp | 956 Nm 705 lb-ft |
| CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8 (Stage 1)643 hp | 867 Nm 639 lb-ft |
| CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8564 hp | 747 Nm 551 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8 (Stage 3)801 hp | 1,930 kg 4,255 lb |
| CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8 (Stage 2)705 hp | 1,930 kg 4,255 lb |
| CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8 (Stage 1)643 hp | 1,930 kg 4,255 lb |
| CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8564 hp | 1,930 kg 4,255 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8 (Stage 3)801 hp | Unrestricted 340 km/h211 mph Restricted 325 km/h202 mph |
| CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8 (Stage 2)705 hp | 313 km/h 194 mph |
| CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8 (Stage 1)643 hp | 305 km/h 190 mph |
| CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8564 hp | 282 km/h 175 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8 (Stage 3)801 hp | 3.2 s |
| CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8 (Stage 2)705 hp | 3.5 s |
| CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8 (Stage 1)643 hp | 3.7 s |
| CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8564 hp | 4.0 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Cadillac CTS II V 6.2 V8 (Stage 3) 801 hp and Cadillac CTS II V 6.2 V8 564 hp: 0.8 s.
The closest cars by acceleration are Cadillac CTS II V 6.2 V8 (Stage 2) 705 hp and Cadillac CTS II V 6.2 V8 (Stage 1) 643 hp, separated by only 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8 (Stage 3)801 hp | 14.7 L/100 km 16.0 mpg US 19.2 mpg UK |
| CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8 (Stage 2)705 hp | 14.7 L/100 km 16.0 mpg US 19.2 mpg UK |
| CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8 (Stage 1)643 hp | 14.7 L/100 km 16.0 mpg US 19.2 mpg UK |
| CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8564 hp | 14.7 L/100 km 16.0 mpg US 19.2 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8 (Stage 3)801 hp | 415 hp/t 309 kW/t 2.4 kg/hp |
| CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8 (Stage 2)705 hp | 365 hp/t 272 kW/t 2.7 kg/hp |
| CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8 (Stage 1)643 hp | 333 hp/t 248 kW/t 3.0 kg/hp |
| CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8564 hp | 292 hp/t 218 kW/t 3.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8 (Stage 3)801 hp | 463 km 287 mi |
| CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8 (Stage 2)705 hp | 463 km 287 mi |
| CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8 (Stage 1)643 hp | 463 km 287 mi |
| CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8564 hp | 463 km 287 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8 (Stage 3)801 hp | 801 hp 597 kW | 3.2 s | Unrestricted 340 km/h211 mph Restricted 325 km/h202 mph |
| CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8 (Stage 2)705 hp | 705 hp 526 kW | 3.5 s | 313 km/h 194 mph |
| CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8 (Stage 1)643 hp | 643 hp 479 kW | 3.7 s | 305 km/h 190 mph |
| CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8564 hp | 564 hp 421 kW | 4.0 s | 282 km/h 175 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8 (Stage 3)801 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8 (Stage 2)705 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8 (Stage 1)643 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8564 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8 (Stage 3)801 hp |
| 14.7 L/100 km 16.0 mpg US 19.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8 (Stage 2)705 hp |
| 14.7 L/100 km 16.0 mpg US 19.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8 (Stage 1)643 hp |
| 14.7 L/100 km 16.0 mpg US 19.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8564 hp |
| 14.7 L/100 km 16.0 mpg US 19.2 mpg UK | ||||||
Cadillac CTS II V 6.2 V8 (Stage 3) 801 hp is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8 (Stage 3)801 hp | 14.7 L/100 km 16.0 mpg US 19.2 mpg UK | 3.2 s |
| CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8 (Stage 2)705 hp | 14.7 L/100 km 16.0 mpg US 19.2 mpg UK | 3.5 s |
| CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8 (Stage 1)643 hp | 14.7 L/100 km 16.0 mpg US 19.2 mpg UK | 3.7 s |
| CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8564 hp | 14.7 L/100 km 16.0 mpg US 19.2 mpg UK | 4.0 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8 (Stage 3)801 hp | 415 hp/t 309 kW/t 2.4 kg/hp | 14.7 L/100 km 16.0 mpg US 19.2 mpg UK |
| CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8 (Stage 2)705 hp | 365 hp/t 272 kW/t 2.7 kg/hp | 14.7 L/100 km 16.0 mpg US 19.2 mpg UK |
| CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8 (Stage 1)643 hp | 333 hp/t 248 kW/t 3.0 kg/hp | 14.7 L/100 km 16.0 mpg US 19.2 mpg UK |
| CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8564 hp | 292 hp/t 218 kW/t 3.4 kg/hp | 14.7 L/100 km 16.0 mpg US 19.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8 (Stage 3)801 hp | CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8 (Stage 2)705 hp | CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8 (Stage 1)643 hp | CadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8564 hp | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 801 hp 597 kW | 705 hp 526 kW | 643 hp 479 kW | 564 hp 421 kW | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 1,083 Nm 799 lb-ft | 956 Nm 705 lb-ft | 867 Nm 639 lb-ft | 747 Nm 551 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.2 s | 3.5 s | 3.7 s | 4.0 s | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 340 km/h211 mph Restricted 325 km/h202 mph | 313 km/h 194 mph | 305 km/h 190 mph | 282 km/h 175 mph | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,930 kg 4,255 lb | 1,930 kg 4,255 lb | 1,930 kg 4,255 lb | 1,930 kg 4,255 lb | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 14.7 L/100 km 16.0 mpg US 19.2 mpg UK | 14.7 L/100 km 16.0 mpg US 19.2 mpg UK | 14.7 L/100 km 16.0 mpg US 19.2 mpg UK | 14.7 L/100 km 16.0 mpg US 19.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 463 km 287 mi | 463 km 287 mi | 463 km 287 mi | 463 km 287 mi | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 385 L 13.6 cu ft | 385 L 13.6 cu ft | 385 L 13.6 cu ft | 385 L 13.6 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 415 hp/t 309 kW/t 2.4 kg/hp | 365 hp/t 272 kW/t 2.7 kg/hp | 333 hp/t 248 kW/t 3.0 kg/hp | 292 hp/t 218 kW/t 3.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Cadillac CTS II V 6.2 V8 (Stage 3) 801 hp | Cadillac CTS II V 6.2 V8 (Stage 2) 705 hp | Cadillac CTS II V 6.2 V8 (Stage 1) 643 hp | Cadillac CTS II V 6.2 V8 564 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 14.7 L/100 km16 mpg US19.2 mpg UK | 14.7 L/100 km16 mpg US19.2 mpg UK | 14.7 L/100 km16 mpg US19.2 mpg UK | 14.7 L/100 km16 mpg US19.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 25.72 LC100 km | 25.72 LC100 km | 25.72 LC100 km | 25.72 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 41.40 LC100 mi | 41.40 LC100 mi | 41.40 LC100 mi | 41.40 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,205 L582 US gal485 UK gal | 2,205 L582 US gal485 UK gal | 2,205 L582 US gal485 UK gal | 2,205 L582 US gal485 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,859 LC/year | 3,859 LC/year | 3,859 LC/year | 3,859 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Cadillac CTS II V 6.2 V8 (Stage 3) 801 hp
- Has 96 hp more
- Has 127 Nm more
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 27 km/h (17 mph) higher top speed
- Has 50 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cadillac CTS II V 6.2 V8 (Stage 2) 705 hp
No measurable advantages in the available data.
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























