Car comparison

Cadillac CT6 II 28TvsLincoln Z 2.0T

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Cadillac CT6 II

28T

237 hp1998 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticTurbochargedSedan2023-present
VS

Lincoln Z

2.0T

246 hp1999 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedSedan2022-2024

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Lincoln Z 2.0T

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.8 s
  • Most powerful
    246 hp
    183 kW
  • Highest torque
    376 Nm
    277 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,640 kg
    3,616 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    150 hp/t
    112 kW/t
    6.7 kg/hp
  • Best overall score
    64/100
  • Best performance score
    57/100
  • Best practicality score
    78/100

Cadillac CT6 II 28T

  • Fastest top speed
    245 km/h
    152 mph Unrestricted
    230 km/h
    143 mph Restricted
  • Best economy score
    86/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelCadillacCT6 II28TLincolnZ2.0T
Power
237hp177kW
246hp183kW
Torque
350Nm258lb-ft
376Nm277lb-ft
Curb weight
1,760kg3,880lb
1,640kg3,616lb
Gross weight-
2,050kg4,519lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
245 km/h152 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Calculated
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
225 km/h140 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
72.5s99% target: 243 km/h / 151 mph
Calculated
61.8s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.5s
6.8s
0-200 km/h
25.5s
Calculated
23.4s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.2s
Calculated
6.5s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK
-
Quarter mile
15.3s
Calculated
14.7s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
135hp/t100kW/t61hp/1000 lb
Calculated
150hp/t112kW/t68hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
199Nm/t133lb-ft/ton
Calculated
229Nm/t153lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
935km581mi
Calculated
-
Displacement
1,998cc122cu in
1,999cc122cu in
Length
5,223mm206in
4,982mm196in
Width
1,890mm74in
1,865mm73in
Height
1,480mm58in
1,485mm58in
Wheelbase
3,109mm122in
2,930mm115in
Front track
1,631mm64in
1,599mm63in
Rear track
1,652mm65in
1,593mm63in
Trunk volume
508L
-
Doors
4
4
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
72L
66L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Cadillac CT6 II 28TLincoln Z 2.0TPowerTorque
  • Cadillac CT6 II 28T: Power / Torque
  • Lincoln Z 2.0T: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
CadillacCT6 II28T5,000 rpm1,500-4,000 rpm5,250 rpm
LincolnZ2.0T5,500 rpm2,500-4,000 rpm5,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricCadillacCT6 II28TLincolnZ2.0T
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.2 s
6.5 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.5 s
6.8 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
25.5 s
23.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
245 km/h152 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Likely limited
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
225 km/h140 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.8 s
2.7 s
330 ft
101 m
7.0 s
6.7 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.2 s
9.8 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.0 s
12.5 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.3 s
14.7 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
158 km/h
98 mph
164 km/h
102 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacCT6 II28T
237 hp
177 kW
LincolnZ2.0T
246 hp
183 kW

Lincoln Z 2.0T has 9 hp more than Cadillac CT6 II 28T.

The biggest power difference is between Cadillac CT6 II 28T and Lincoln Z 2.0T: 9 hp (7 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacCT6 II28T
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
LincolnZ2.0T
376 Nm
277 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacCT6 II28T
1,760 kg
3,880 lb
LincolnZ2.0T
1,640 kg
3,616 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacCT6 II28T
Unrestricted
245 km/h152 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
LincolnZ2.0T
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
225 km/h140 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacCT6 II28T7.5 s
LincolnZ2.0T6.8 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Lincoln Z 2.0T and Cadillac CT6 II 28T: 0.7 s.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacCT6 II28T
135 hp/t
100 kW/t
7.4 kg/hp
LincolnZ2.0T
150 hp/t
112 kW/t
6.7 kg/hp

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
CadillacCT6 II28T
237 hp
177 kW
7.5 s
Unrestricted
245 km/h152 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
LincolnZ2.0T
246 hp
183 kW
6.8 s
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
225 km/h140 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
CadillacCT6 II28T
Power
237 hp
177 kW
0-100 km/h7.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
245 km/h152 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
508 L
17.9 cu ft
Length
5,223 mm
205.6 in
Height
1,480 mm
58.3 in
LincolnZ2.0T
Power
246 hp
183 kW
0-100 km/h6.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
225 km/h140 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,982 mm
196.1 in
Height
1,485 mm
58.5 in

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleCadillacCT6 II28TLincolnZ2.0T
Power
237 hp
177 kW
246 hp
183 kW
Torque
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
376 Nm
277 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.5 s
6.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
245 km/h152 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
225 km/h140 mph
Lightness
1,760 kg
3,880 lb
1,640 kg
3,616 lb
Fuel consumption
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK
-
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
508 L
17.9 cu ft
Length
5,223 mm
205.6 in
Height
1,480 mm
58.3 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,982 mm
196.1 in
Height
1,485 mm
58.5 in
Range score
935 km
581 mi
-
Trunk score
508 L
17.9 cu ft
-
Power-to-weight score
135 hp/t
100 kW/t
7.4 kg/hp
150 hp/t
112 kW/t
6.7 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleCadillac CT6 II 28T
Consumption7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km13.48 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi21.69 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,155 L305 US gal254 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,021 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Cadillac CT6 II 28T

  • Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed

Pros

  • Highest top speed

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Heaviest

Lincoln Z 2.0T

  • Has 9 hp more
  • Has 26 Nm more
  • Is 120 kg lighter
  • Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 15 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Cadillac CT6 II 28T
Lincoln Z 2.0T
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Cadillac CT6 II 28T vs Lincoln Z 2.0T - car comparison - FastVsFaster