Cadillac CT6 II
Car comparison
Cadillac CT6 II 28TvsLincoln Z 2.0T
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonLincoln Z
2.0T
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Lincoln Z 2.0T
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.8 s
- Most powerful246 hp183 kW
- Highest torque376 Nm277 lb-ft
- Lightest1,640 kg3,616 lb
- Best power-to-weight150 hp/t112 kW/t6.7 kg/hp
- Best overall score64/100
- Best performance score57/100
- Best practicality score78/100
Cadillac CT6 II 28T
- Fastest top speed245 km/h152 mph Unrestricted230 km/h143 mph Restricted
- Best economy score86/100
Specification comparison
| Model | CadillacCT6 II28T | LincolnZ2.0T |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 237hp177kW | 246hp183kW |
| Torque | 350Nm258lb-ft | 376Nm277lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,760kg3,880lb | 1,640kg3,616lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,050kg4,519lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 72.5s99% target: 243 km/h / 151 mph Calculated | 61.8s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.5s | 6.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 25.5s Calculated | 23.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.2s Calculated | 6.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 15.3s Calculated | 14.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 135hp/t100kW/t61hp/1000 lb Calculated | 150hp/t112kW/t68hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 199Nm/t133lb-ft/ton Calculated | 229Nm/t153lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 935km581mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 1,998cc122cu in | 1,999cc122cu in |
| Length | 5,223mm206in | 4,982mm196in |
| Width | 1,890mm74in | 1,865mm73in |
| Height | 1,480mm58in | 1,485mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 3,109mm122in | 2,930mm115in |
| Front track | 1,631mm64in | 1,599mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,652mm65in | 1,593mm63in |
| Trunk volume | 508L | - |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 72L | 66L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Cadillac CT6 II 28T: Power / Torque
- Lincoln Z 2.0T: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| CadillacCT6 II28T | 5,000 rpm | 1,500-4,000 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
| LincolnZ2.0T | 5,500 rpm | 2,500-4,000 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | CadillacCT6 II28T | LincolnZ2.0T |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.2 s | 6.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.5 s | 6.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 25.5 s | 23.4 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.8 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.0 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.2 s | 9.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.0 s | 12.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.3 s | 14.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 158 km/h 98 mph | 164 km/h 102 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacCT6 II28T | 237 hp 177 kW |
| LincolnZ2.0T | 246 hp 183 kW |
Lincoln Z 2.0T has 9 hp more than Cadillac CT6 II 28T.
The biggest power difference is between Cadillac CT6 II 28T and Lincoln Z 2.0T: 9 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacCT6 II28T | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
| LincolnZ2.0T | 376 Nm 277 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacCT6 II28T | 1,760 kg 3,880 lb |
| LincolnZ2.0T | 1,640 kg 3,616 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacCT6 II28T | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
| LincolnZ2.0T | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacCT6 II28T | 7.5 s |
| LincolnZ2.0T | 6.8 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Lincoln Z 2.0T and Cadillac CT6 II 28T: 0.7 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacCT6 II28T | 135 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp |
| LincolnZ2.0T | 150 hp/t 112 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| CadillacCT6 II28T | 237 hp 177 kW | 7.5 s | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
| LincolnZ2.0T | 246 hp 183 kW | 6.8 s | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CadillacCT6 II28T |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| LincolnZ2.0T |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | CadillacCT6 II28T | LincolnZ2.0T | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 237 hp 177 kW | 246 hp 183 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | 376 Nm 277 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.5 s | 6.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,760 kg 3,880 lb | 1,640 kg 3,616 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 935 km 581 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 508 L 17.9 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 135 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp | 150 hp/t 112 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Cadillac CT6 II 28T |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.48 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 21.69 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,155 L305 US gal254 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,021 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Cadillac CT6 II 28T
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Highest top speed
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
Lincoln Z 2.0T
- Has 9 hp more
- Has 26 Nm more
- Is 120 kg lighter
- Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 15 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























