Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206)
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 300vsLincoln Z 2.0T
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonLincoln Z
2.0T
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 300
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.0 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful258 hp192 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight156 hp/t116 kW/t6.4 kg/hp
- Best overall score67/100
- Best performance score63/100
- Best economy score87/100
Lincoln Z 2.0T
- Lightest1,640 kg3,616 lb
- Best practicality score78/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 300 | LincolnZ2.0T |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 258hp192kW | 246hp183kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 376Nm277lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,655kg3,649lb | 1,640kg3,616lb |
| Gross weight | 2,335kg5,148lb | 2,050kg4,519lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 58.3s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 61.8s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.0s | 6.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 18.3s Calculated | 23.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.7s Calculated | 6.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 13.9s Calculated | 14.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 156hp/t116kW/t71hp/1000 lb Calculated | 150hp/t112kW/t68hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 242Nm/t162lb-ft/ton Calculated | 229Nm/t153lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 685km426mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 1,999cc122cu in | 1,999cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,751mm187in | 4,982mm196in |
| Width | 1,820mm72in | 1,865mm73in |
| Height | 1,437mm57in | 1,485mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,865mm113in | 2,930mm115in |
| Front track | 1,601mm63in | 1,599mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,613mm64in | 1,593mm63in |
| Trunk volume | 455L | - |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 50L | 66L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 300: Power / Torque
- Lincoln Z 2.0T: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 300 | 5,800 rpm | 2,000-3,200 rpm | 6,050 rpm |
| LincolnZ2.0T | 5,500 rpm | 2,500-4,000 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 300 | LincolnZ2.0T |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.7 s | 6.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.0 s | 6.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 18.3 s | 23.4 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.4 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.3 s | 9.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.8 s | 12.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.9 s | 14.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 175 km/h 109 mph | 164 km/h 102 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 300 | 258 hp 192 kW |
| LincolnZ2.0T | 246 hp 183 kW |
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 300 has 12 hp more than Lincoln Z 2.0T.
The biggest power difference is between Lincoln Z 2.0T and Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 300: 12 hp (9 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 300 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| LincolnZ2.0T | 376 Nm 277 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 300 | 1,655 kg 3,649 lb |
| LincolnZ2.0T | 1,640 kg 3,616 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 300 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| LincolnZ2.0T | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 300 | 6.0 s |
| LincolnZ2.0T | 6.8 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 300 and Lincoln Z 2.0T: 0.8 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 300 | 156 hp/t 116 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp |
| LincolnZ2.0T | 150 hp/t 112 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 300 | 258 hp 192 kW | 6.0 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| LincolnZ2.0T | 246 hp 183 kW | 6.8 s | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 300 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| LincolnZ2.0T |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 300 | LincolnZ2.0T | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 258 hp 192 kW | 246 hp 183 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 376 Nm 277 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.0 s | 6.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,655 kg 3,649 lb | 1,640 kg 3,616 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 685 km 426 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 455 L 16.1 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 156 hp/t 116 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp | 150 hp/t 112 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 300 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.3 L/100 km32.2 mpg US38.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.78 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 20.56 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,095 L289 US gal241 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,916 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 300
- Has 12 hp more
- Has 24 Nm more
- Is 0.8 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 20 km/h (12 mph) higher top speed
- Has 6 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Heaviest
Lincoln Z 2.0T
- Is 15 kg lighter
Pros
- Lightest
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























