Car comparison

Cadillac CT6 II 28TvsHongqi H5 II 2.0T

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Cadillac CT6 II

28T

237 hp1998 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticTurbochargedSedan2023-present
VS

Hongqi H5 II

2.0T

224 hp1989 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedSedan2022-present

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Cadillac CT6 II 28T

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.5 s
  • Fastest top speed
    245 km/h
    152 mph Unrestricted
    230 km/h
    143 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    237 hp
    177 kW
  • Highest torque
    350 Nm
    258 lb-ft
  • Best estimated range
    935 km
    581 mi
  • Best overall score
    62/100
  • Best performance score
    55/100

Hongqi H5 II 2.0T

  • Lightest
    1,635 kg
    3,605 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    137 hp/t
    102 kW/t
    7.3 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    6.4 L/100 km
    36.8 mpg US
    44.1 mpg UK
  • Best economy score
    90/100
  • Best practicality score
    78/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelCadillacCT6 II28THongqiH5 II2.0T
Power
237hp177kW
224hp167kW
Torque
350Nm258lb-ft
340Nm251lb-ft
Curb weight
1,760kg3,880lb
1,635kg3,605lb
Gross weight-
2,085kg4,597lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
245 km/h152 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Calculated
Unrestricted
245 km/h152 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
72.5s99% target: 243 km/h / 151 mph
Calculated
74.7s99% target: 243 km/h / 151 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.5s
7.8s
0-200 km/h
25.5s
Calculated
26.4s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.2s
Calculated
7.4s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK
6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.3s
Calculated
15.6s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
135hp/t100kW/t61hp/1000 lb
Calculated
137hp/t102kW/t62hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
199Nm/t133lb-ft/ton
Calculated
208Nm/t139lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
935km581mi
Calculated
906km563mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,998cc122cu in
1,989cc121cu in
Length
5,223mm206in
4,988mm196in
Width
1,890mm74in
1,875mm74in
Height
1,480mm58in
1,470mm58in
Wheelbase
3,109mm122in
2,920mm115in
Front track
1,631mm64in
1,615mm64in
Rear track
1,652mm65in
1,607mm63in
Trunk volume
508L
-
Doors
4
4
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
72L
58L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricCadillacCT6 II28THongqiH5 II2.0T
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.2 s
7.4 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.5 s
7.8 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
25.5 s
26.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
245 km/h152 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Likely limited
Unrestricted
245 km/h152 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.8 s
2.8 s
330 ft
101 m
7.0 s
7.1 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.2 s
10.4 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.0 s
13.2 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.3 s
15.6 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
158 km/h
98 mph
157 km/h
97 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacCT6 II28T
237 hp
177 kW
HongqiH5 II2.0T
224 hp
167 kW

Cadillac CT6 II 28T has 13 hp more than Hongqi H5 II 2.0T.

The biggest power difference is between Hongqi H5 II 2.0T and Cadillac CT6 II 28T: 13 hp (10 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacCT6 II28T
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
HongqiH5 II2.0T
340 Nm
251 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacCT6 II28T
1,760 kg
3,880 lb
HongqiH5 II2.0T
1,635 kg
3,605 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacCT6 II28T
Unrestricted
245 km/h152 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
HongqiH5 II2.0T
Unrestricted
245 km/h152 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacCT6 II28T7.5 s
HongqiH5 II2.0T7.8 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Cadillac CT6 II 28T and Hongqi H5 II 2.0T: 0.3 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacCT6 II28T
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK
HongqiH5 II2.0T
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Hongqi H5 II 2.0T and Cadillac CT6 II 28T: 1.3 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacCT6 II28T
135 hp/t
100 kW/t
7.4 kg/hp
HongqiH5 II2.0T
137 hp/t
102 kW/t
7.3 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacCT6 II28T
935 km
581 mi
HongqiH5 II2.0T
906 km
563 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
CadillacCT6 II28T
237 hp
177 kW
7.5 s
Unrestricted
245 km/h152 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
HongqiH5 II2.0T
224 hp
167 kW
7.8 s
Unrestricted
245 km/h152 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
CadillacCT6 II28T
Power
237 hp
177 kW
0-100 km/h7.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
245 km/h152 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
508 L
17.9 cu ft
Length
5,223 mm
205.6 in
Height
1,480 mm
58.3 in
HongqiH5 II2.0T
Power
224 hp
167 kW
0-100 km/h7.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
245 km/h152 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,988 mm
196.4 in
Height
1,470 mm
57.9 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
CadillacCT6 II28T
Power
237 hp
177 kW
0-100 km/h7.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
245 km/h152 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK
HongqiH5 II2.0T
Power
224 hp
167 kW
0-100 km/h7.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
245 km/h152 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK

Cadillac CT6 II 28T is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
CadillacCT6 II28T
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK
7.5 s
HongqiH5 II2.0T
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK
7.8 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
CadillacCT6 II28T
135 hp/t
100 kW/t
7.4 kg/hp
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK
HongqiH5 II2.0T
137 hp/t
102 kW/t
7.3 kg/hp
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleCadillacCT6 II28THongqiH5 II2.0T
Power
237 hp
177 kW
224 hp
167 kW
Torque
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
340 Nm
251 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.5 s
7.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
245 km/h152 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Unrestricted
245 km/h152 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Lightness
1,760 kg
3,880 lb
1,635 kg
3,605 lb
Fuel consumption
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
508 L
17.9 cu ft
Length
5,223 mm
205.6 in
Height
1,480 mm
58.3 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,988 mm
196.4 in
Height
1,470 mm
57.9 in
Range score
935 km
581 mi
906 km
563 mi
Trunk score
508 L
17.9 cu ft
-
Power-to-weight score
135 hp/t
100 kW/t
7.4 kg/hp
137 hp/t
102 kW/t
7.3 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleCadillac CT6 II 28THongqi H5 II 2.0T
Consumption7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km13.48 LC100 km11.20 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi21.69 LC100 mi18.02 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,155 L305 US gal254 UK gal960 L254 US gal211 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,021 LC/year1,680 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Cadillac CT6 II 28T

  • Has 13 hp more
  • Has 10 Nm more
  • Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 29 km (18 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest

Hongqi H5 II 2.0T

  • Is 125 kg lighter
  • Uses 1.3 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 2 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Cadillac CT6 II 28T
Hongqi H5 II 2.0T
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Cadillac CT6 II 28T vs Hongqi H5 II 2.0T - car comparison - FastVsFaster