Cadillac CT6 II
Car comparison
Cadillac CT6 II 28TvsDS 9 1.6 PureTech
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonDS 9
1.6 PureTech
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Cadillac CT6 II 28T
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.5 s
- Fastest top speed245 km/h152 mph Unrestricted230 km/h143 mph Restricted
- Most powerful237 hp177 kW
- Highest torque350 Nm258 lb-ft
- Best overall score62/100
- Best performance score55/100
- Best practicality score76/100
DS 9 1.6 PureTech
- Lightest1,540 kg3,395 lb
- Best power-to-weight146 hp/t109 kW/t6.8 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.7 L/100 km41.3 mpg US49.6 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,053 km654 mi
- Largest trunk510 L
- Best economy score91/100
Specification comparison
| Model | CadillacCT6 II28T | DS91.6 PureTech |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 237hp177kW | 225hp168kW |
| Torque | 350Nm258lb-ft | 300Nm221lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,760kg3,880lb | 1,540kg3,395lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,075kg4,575lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Calculated | 236 km/h 147 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 72.5s99% target: 243 km/h / 151 mph Calculated | 72.9s99% target: 234 km/h / 145 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.5s | 8.1s |
| 0-200 km/h | 25.5s Calculated | 28.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.2s Calculated | 7.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK | 5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.3s Calculated | 15.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 135hp/t100kW/t61hp/1000 lb Calculated | 146hp/t109kW/t66hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 199Nm/t133lb-ft/ton Calculated | 195Nm/t130lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 935km581mi Calculated | 1,053km654mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,998cc122cu in | 1,598cc98cu in |
| Length | 5,223mm206in | 4,934mm194in |
| Width | 1,890mm74in | 1,932mm76in |
| Height | 1,480mm58in | 1,460mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 3,109mm122in | 2,895mm114in |
| Front track | 1,631mm64in | 1,584mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,652mm65in | 1,566mm62in |
| Trunk volume | 508L | 510L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 72L | 60L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Cadillac CT6 II 28T: Power / Torque
- DS 9 1.6 PureTech: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| CadillacCT6 II28T | 5,000 rpm | 1,500-4,000 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
| DS91.6 PureTech | 5,500 rpm | 1,900 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | CadillacCT6 II28T | DS91.6 PureTech |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.2 s | 7.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.5 s | 8.1 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 25.5 s | 28.8 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Likely limited | 236 km/h 147 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.8 s | 2.9 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.0 s | 7.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.2 s | 10.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.0 s | 13.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.3 s | 15.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 158 km/h 98 mph | 154 km/h 96 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacCT6 II28T | 237 hp 177 kW |
| DS91.6 PureTech | 225 hp 168 kW |
Cadillac CT6 II 28T has 12 hp more than DS 9 1.6 PureTech.
The biggest power difference is between DS 9 1.6 PureTech and Cadillac CT6 II 28T: 12 hp (9 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacCT6 II28T | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
| DS91.6 PureTech | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacCT6 II28T | 1,760 kg 3,880 lb |
| DS91.6 PureTech | 1,540 kg 3,395 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacCT6 II28T | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
| DS91.6 PureTech | 236 km/h 147 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacCT6 II28T | 7.5 s |
| DS91.6 PureTech | 8.1 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Cadillac CT6 II 28T and DS 9 1.6 PureTech: 0.6 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacCT6 II28T | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK |
| DS91.6 PureTech | 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between DS 9 1.6 PureTech and Cadillac CT6 II 28T: 2.0 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacCT6 II28T | 135 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp |
| DS91.6 PureTech | 146 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacCT6 II28T | 935 km 581 mi |
| DS91.6 PureTech | 1,053 km 654 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| CadillacCT6 II28T | 237 hp 177 kW | 7.5 s | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
| DS91.6 PureTech | 225 hp 168 kW | 8.1 s | 236 km/h 147 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CadillacCT6 II28T |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| DS91.6 PureTech |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CadillacCT6 II28T |
| 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| DS91.6 PureTech |
| 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK | ||||||
Cadillac CT6 II 28T is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| CadillacCT6 II28T | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | 7.5 s |
| DS91.6 PureTech | 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK | 8.1 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| CadillacCT6 II28T | 135 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK |
| DS91.6 PureTech | 146 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | CadillacCT6 II28T | DS91.6 PureTech | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 237 hp 177 kW | 225 hp 168 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.5 s | 8.1 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph | 236 km/h 147 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,760 kg 3,880 lb | 1,540 kg 3,395 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 935 km 581 mi | 1,053 km 654 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 508 L 17.9 cu ft | 510 L 18.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 135 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp | 146 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Cadillac CT6 II 28T | DS 9 1.6 PureTech |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK | 5.7 L/100 km41.3 mpg US49.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.48 LC100 km | 9.98 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 21.69 LC100 mi | 16.05 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,155 L305 US gal254 UK gal | 855 L226 US gal188 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,021 LC/year | 1,496 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Cadillac CT6 II 28T
- Has 12 hp more
- Has 50 Nm more
- Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 9 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
DS 9 1.6 PureTech
- Is 220 kg lighter
- Uses 2.0 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 11 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 118 km (73 mi) more estimated range
- Has 2 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























