Car comparison

Cadillac CTS III 2.0vsCadillac CT6 II 28T

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Cadillac CTS III

2.0

272 hp1998 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSedan2014-2019
VS

Cadillac CT6 II

28T

237 hp1998 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticTurbochargedSedan2023-present

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Cadillac CTS III 2.0

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.8 s
  • Fastest top speed
    250 km/h
    155 mph
  • Most powerful
    272 hp
    203 kW
  • Highest torque
    400 Nm
    295 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,725 kg
    3,803 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    158 hp/t
    118 kW/t
    6.3 kg/hp
  • Best overall score
    62/100
  • Best performance score
    58/100

Cadillac CT6 II 28T

  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    7.7 L/100 km
    30.5 mpg US
    36.7 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    935 km
    581 mi
  • Largest trunk
    508 L
  • Best economy score
    86/100
  • Best practicality score
    76/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelCadillacCTS III2.0CadillacCT6 II28T
Power
272hp203kW
237hp177kW
Torque
400Nm295lb-ft
350Nm258lb-ft
Curb weight
1,725kg3,803lb
1,760kg3,880lb
Top speed
250 km/h
155 mph
Unrestricted
245 km/h152 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
71.1s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph
Calculated
72.5s99% target: 243 km/h / 151 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
6.8s
7.5s
0-200 km/h
23.2s
Calculated
25.5s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.5s
Calculated
7.2s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
9.8L/100 km24mpg US28.8mpg UK
7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
11.2L/100 km21mpg US25.2mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption highway
8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK
-
Quarter mile
14.7s
Calculated
15.3s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
158hp/t118kW/t72hp/1000 lb
Calculated
135hp/t100kW/t61hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
232Nm/t155lb-ft/ton
Calculated
199Nm/t133lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
735km457mi
Calculated
935km581mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,998cc122cu in
1,998cc122cu in
Length
4,966mm196in
5,223mm206in
Width
1,833mm72in
1,890mm74in
Height
1,454mm57in
1,480mm58in
Wheelbase
2,910mm115in
3,109mm122in
Front track
1,560mm61in
1,631mm64in
Rear track
1,568mm62in
1,652mm65in
Trunk volume
388L
508L
Doors
4
4
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
72L
72L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Cadillac CTS III 2.0Cadillac CT6 II 28TPowerTorque
  • Cadillac CTS III 2.0: Power / Torque
  • Cadillac CT6 II 28T: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
CadillacCTS III2.05,600 rpm3,000-4,500 rpm6,400 rpm
CadillacCT6 II28T5,000 rpm1,500-4,000 rpm5,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricCadillacCTS III2.0CadillacCT6 II28T
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.5 s
7.2 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
6.8 s
7.5 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
23.2 s
25.5 s
Top speed
250 km/h
155 mph
Unrestricted
245 km/h152 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.6 s
2.8 s
330 ft
101 m
6.6 s
7.0 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.8 s
10.2 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.5 s
13.0 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.7 s
15.3 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
163 km/h
101 mph
158 km/h
98 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacCTS III2.0
272 hp
203 kW
CadillacCT6 II28T
237 hp
177 kW

Cadillac CTS III 2.0 has 35 hp more than Cadillac CT6 II 28T.

The biggest power difference is between Cadillac CT6 II 28T and Cadillac CTS III 2.0: 35 hp (26 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacCTS III2.0
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
CadillacCT6 II28T
350 Nm
258 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacCTS III2.0
1,725 kg
3,803 lb
CadillacCT6 II28T
1,760 kg
3,880 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacCTS III2.0
250 km/h
155 mph
CadillacCT6 II28T
Unrestricted
245 km/h152 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacCTS III2.06.8 s
CadillacCT6 II28T7.5 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Cadillac CTS III 2.0 and Cadillac CT6 II 28T: 0.7 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacCTS III2.0
9.8 L/100 km
24.0 mpg US
28.8 mpg UK
CadillacCT6 II28T
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Cadillac CT6 II 28T and Cadillac CTS III 2.0: 2.1 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacCTS III2.0
158 hp/t
118 kW/t
6.3 kg/hp
CadillacCT6 II28T
135 hp/t
100 kW/t
7.4 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacCTS III2.0
735 km
457 mi
CadillacCT6 II28T
935 km
581 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
CadillacCTS III2.0
272 hp
203 kW
6.8 s
250 km/h
155 mph
CadillacCT6 II28T
237 hp
177 kW
7.5 s
Unrestricted
245 km/h152 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
CadillacCTS III2.0
Power
272 hp
203 kW
0-100 km/h6.8 s
Top speed
250 km/h
155 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
388 L
13.7 cu ft
Length
4,966 mm
195.5 in
Height
1,454 mm
57.2 in
CadillacCT6 II28T
Power
237 hp
177 kW
0-100 km/h7.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
245 km/h152 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
508 L
17.9 cu ft
Length
5,223 mm
205.6 in
Height
1,480 mm
58.3 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
CadillacCTS III2.0
Power
272 hp
203 kW
0-100 km/h6.8 s
Top speed
250 km/h
155 mph
9.8 L/100 km
24.0 mpg US
28.8 mpg UK
CadillacCT6 II28T
Power
237 hp
177 kW
0-100 km/h7.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
245 km/h152 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK

Cadillac CTS III 2.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
CadillacCTS III2.0
9.8 L/100 km
24.0 mpg US
28.8 mpg UK
6.8 s
CadillacCT6 II28T
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK
7.5 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
CadillacCTS III2.0
158 hp/t
118 kW/t
6.3 kg/hp
9.8 L/100 km
24.0 mpg US
28.8 mpg UK
CadillacCT6 II28T
135 hp/t
100 kW/t
7.4 kg/hp
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleCadillacCTS III2.0CadillacCT6 II28T
Power
272 hp
203 kW
237 hp
177 kW
Torque
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
Acceleration
6.8 s
7.5 s
Top speed
250 km/h
155 mph
Unrestricted
245 km/h152 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Lightness
1,725 kg
3,803 lb
1,760 kg
3,880 lb
Fuel consumption
9.8 L/100 km
24.0 mpg US
28.8 mpg UK
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
388 L
13.7 cu ft
Length
4,966 mm
195.5 in
Height
1,454 mm
57.2 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
508 L
17.9 cu ft
Length
5,223 mm
205.6 in
Height
1,480 mm
58.3 in
Range score
735 km
457 mi
935 km
581 mi
Trunk score
388 L
13.7 cu ft
508 L
17.9 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
158 hp/t
118 kW/t
6.3 kg/hp
135 hp/t
100 kW/t
7.4 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleCadillac CTS III 2.0Cadillac CT6 II 28T
Consumption9.8 L/100 km24 mpg US28.8 mpg UK7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km17.15 LC100 km13.48 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi27.60 LC100 mi21.69 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,470 L388 US gal323 UK gal1,155 L305 US gal254 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,573 LC/year2,021 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Cadillac CTS III 2.0

  • Has 35 hp more
  • Has 50 Nm more
  • Is 35 kg lighter
  • Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 23 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Smallest trunk

Cadillac CT6 II 28T

  • Uses 2.1 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 200 km (125 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 120 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Cadillac CTS III 2.0
Cadillac CT6 II 28T
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0
V 6.2 V8
VS
CadillacCTS III2.0vsCadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8
28T
28T
VS
CadillacCT6 II28TvsCadillacXTSFacelift 201728T
2.0
V 5.7 i V8
VS
CadillacCTS III2.0vsCadillacCTS IV 5.7 i V8
28T
EQE 300 98 kWh
VS
CadillacCT6 II28TvsMercedes-BenzEQE (V295)EQE 300 98 kWh
2.0
2.0
VS
CadillacCTS III2.0vsCadillacATS Sedan2.0
28T
2.0i
VS
CadillacCT6 II28TvsJaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i
2.0
28T
VS
CadillacCTS III2.0vsCadillacXTS28T
28T
380TSI
VS
CadillacCT6 II28TvsVolkswagenMagotan (B9)380TSI
28T
530i
VS
CadillacCT6 II28TvsBMW5 Series Sedan (G60)530i
2.0
730d
VS
CadillacCTS III2.0vsBMW7 Series (G11)730d
28T
45 TDI V6
VS
CadillacCT6 II28TvsAUDIA6 Sedan (C8)Facelift 202345 TDI V6
2.0
3.0d V6
VS
CadillacCTS III2.0vsMaseratiGhibli III (M157)Facelift 20173.0d V6
Cadillac CTS III 2.0 vs Cadillac CT6 II 28T - car comparison - FastVsFaster