Car comparison

Skoda Octavia II Combi · Facelift 2009 RS 2.0 TSIvsCadillac BLS Wagon 2.0 T

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Skoda Octavia II Combi · Facelift 2009

RS 2.0 TSI

200 hp1984 ccGasolineFWDDual-clutchTurbochargedWagon / estate2009-2013
VS

Cadillac BLS Wagon

2.0 T

200 hp1998 ccGasolineFWDManualTurbochargedWagon / estate2007-2009

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Skoda Octavia II Combi Facelift 2009 RS 2.0 TSI

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.3 s
  • Fastest top speed
    237 km/h
    147 mph
  • Most powerful
    200 hp
    149 kW
  • Lightest
    1,485 kg
    3,274 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    135 hp/t
    100 kW/t
    7.4 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    7.7 L/100 km
    30.5 mpg US
    36.7 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    10.4 L/100 km
    22.6 mpg US
    27.2 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    6.2 L/100 km
    37.9 mpg US
    45.6 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    714 km
    444 mi
  • Largest trunk
    605 L
  • Best overall score
    63/100
  • Best performance score
    51/100
  • Best economy score
    86/100
  • Best practicality score
    87/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelSkodaOctavia II CombiFacelift 2009RS 2.0 TSICadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T
Power
200hp149kW
200hp149kW
Torque
280Nm207lb-ft
300Nm221lb-ft
Curb weight
1,485kg3,274lb
1,510kg3,329lb
Gross weight
1,965kg4,332lb
2,070kg4,564lb
Top speed
237 km/h
147 mph
225 km/h
140 mph
To 99% top speed
71.6s99% target: 235 km/h / 146 mph
Calculated
77.6s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.3s
8.2s
0-200 km/h
27.0s
Calculated
34.6s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.0s
Calculated
7.8s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK
8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
10.4L/100 km22.6mpg US27.2mpg UK
11.5L/100 km20.5mpg US24.6mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK
6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.2s
Calculated
15.9s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
135hp/t100kW/t61hp/1000 lb
Calculated
132hp/t99kW/t60hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
189Nm/t126lb-ft/ton
Calculated
199Nm/t133lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
714km444mi
Calculated
699km434mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,984cc121cu in
1,998cc122cu in
Length
4,599mm181in
4,716mm186in
Width
1,769mm70in
1,802mm71in
Height
1,451mm57in
1,543mm61in
Wheelbase
2,578mm101in
2,675mm105in
Front track
1,528mm60in
1,524mm60in
Rear track
1,508mm59in
1,506mm59in
Ground clearance
128mm5in
127mm5in
Trunk volume
605L
419L
Max trunk volume
1,655L
1,273L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
55L
58L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Skoda Octavia II Combi Facelift 2009 RS 2.0 TSICadillac BLS Wagon 2.0 TPowerTorque
  • Skoda Octavia II Combi Facelift 2009 RS 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
  • Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.0 T: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
SkodaOctavia II CombiFacelift 2009RS 2.0 TSI5,100-6,000 rpm1,700-5,000 rpm6,250 rpm
CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T5,500 rpm2,500-4,000 rpm5,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricSkodaOctavia II CombiFacelift 2009RS 2.0 TSICadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.0 s
7.8 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.3 s
8.2 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
27.0 s
34.6 s
Top speed
237 km/h
147 mph
225 km/h
140 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.7 s
2.8 s
330 ft
101 m
6.8 s
7.1 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.1 s
10.5 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.9 s
13.5 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.2 s
15.9 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
157 km/h
98 mph
149 km/h
92 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaOctavia II CombiFacelift 2009RS 2.0 TSI
200 hp
149 kW
CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T
200 hp
149 kW

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaOctavia II CombiFacelift 2009RS 2.0 TSI
280 Nm
207 lb-ft
CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T
300 Nm
221 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaOctavia II CombiFacelift 2009RS 2.0 TSI
1,485 kg
3,274 lb
CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T
1,510 kg
3,329 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaOctavia II CombiFacelift 2009RS 2.0 TSI
237 km/h
147 mph
CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T
225 km/h
140 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaOctavia II CombiFacelift 2009RS 2.0 TSI7.3 s
CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T8.2 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Skoda Octavia II Combi Facelift 2009 RS 2.0 TSI and Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.0 T: 0.9 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaOctavia II CombiFacelift 2009RS 2.0 TSI
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK
CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T
8.3 L/100 km
28.3 mpg US
34.0 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Skoda Octavia II Combi Facelift 2009 RS 2.0 TSI and Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.0 T: 0.6 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaOctavia II CombiFacelift 2009RS 2.0 TSI
135 hp/t
100 kW/t
7.4 kg/hp
CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T
132 hp/t
99 kW/t
7.5 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaOctavia II CombiFacelift 2009RS 2.0 TSI
714 km
444 mi
CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T
699 km
434 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
SkodaOctavia II CombiFacelift 2009RS 2.0 TSI
200 hp
149 kW
7.3 s
237 km/h
147 mph
CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T
200 hp
149 kW
8.2 s
225 km/h
140 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
SkodaOctavia II CombiFacelift 2009RS 2.0 TSI
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h7.3 s
Top speed
237 km/h
147 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
605 L
21.4 cu ft
Length
4,599 mm
181.1 in
Height
1,451 mm
57.1 in
CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h8.2 s
Top speed
225 km/h
140 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
419 L
14.8 cu ft
Length
4,716 mm
185.7 in
Height
1,543 mm
60.7 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
SkodaOctavia II CombiFacelift 2009RS 2.0 TSI
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h7.3 s
Top speed
237 km/h
147 mph
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK
CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h8.2 s
Top speed
225 km/h
140 mph
8.3 L/100 km
28.3 mpg US
34.0 mpg UK

Skoda Octavia II Combi Facelift 2009 RS 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
SkodaOctavia II CombiFacelift 2009RS 2.0 TSI
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK
7.3 s
CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T
8.3 L/100 km
28.3 mpg US
34.0 mpg UK
8.2 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
SkodaOctavia II CombiFacelift 2009RS 2.0 TSI
135 hp/t
100 kW/t
7.4 kg/hp
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK
CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T
132 hp/t
99 kW/t
7.6 kg/hp
8.3 L/100 km
28.3 mpg US
34.0 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleSkodaOctavia II CombiFacelift 2009RS 2.0 TSICadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T
Power
200 hp
149 kW
200 hp
149 kW
Torque
280 Nm
207 lb-ft
300 Nm
221 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.3 s
8.2 s
Top speed
237 km/h
147 mph
225 km/h
140 mph
Lightness
1,485 kg
3,274 lb
1,510 kg
3,329 lb
Fuel consumption
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK
8.3 L/100 km
28.3 mpg US
34.0 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
605 L
21.4 cu ft
Length
4,599 mm
181.1 in
Height
1,451 mm
57.1 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
419 L
14.8 cu ft
Length
4,716 mm
185.7 in
Height
1,543 mm
60.7 in
Range score
714 km
444 mi
699 km
434 mi
Trunk score
605 L
21.4 cu ft
419 L
14.8 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
135 hp/t
100 kW/t
7.4 kg/hp
132 hp/t
99 kW/t
7.6 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleSkoda Octavia II Combi Facelift 2009 RS 2.0 TSICadillac BLS Wagon 2.0 T
Consumption7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK8.3 L/100 km28.3 mpg US34 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km13.48 LC100 km14.53 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi21.69 LC100 mi23.38 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,155 L305 US gal254 UK gal1,245 L329 US gal274 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,021 LC/year2,179 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Skoda Octavia II Combi Facelift 2009 RS 2.0 TSI

  • Is 25 kg lighter
  • Is 0.9 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 12 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 0.6 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 2 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 15 km (10 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 186 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.0 T

  • Has 20 Nm more

Pros

  • Highest torque

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Skoda Octavia II Combi RS 2.0 TSI
Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.0 T
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

RS 2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
SkodaOctavia II CombiFacelift 2009RS 2.0 TSIvsSeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI
2.0 T
2.8 T V6
VS
CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 TvsCadillacBLS2.8 T V6
RS 2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
SkodaOctavia II CombiFacelift 2009RS 2.0 TSIvsSeatExeo ST2.0 TSI
2.0 T
2.4 JTDM 20V
VS
CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 TvsAlfa Romeo159 Sportwagon2.4 JTDM 20V
RS 2.0 TSI
2.4 i-VTEC
VS
SkodaOctavia II CombiFacelift 2009RS 2.0 TSIvsHondaAccord VIIIFacelift 20112.4 i-VTEC
2.0 T
2.4 D5
VS
CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 TvsVolvoV50Facelift 20072.4 D5
RS 2.0 TSI
GT 2.0 TCe
VS
SkodaOctavia II CombiFacelift 2009RS 2.0 TSIvsRenaultMegane III GrandtourGT 2.0 TCe
RS 2.0 TSI
Cooper S 1.6
VS
SkodaOctavia II CombiFacelift 2009RS 2.0 TSIvsMiniClubman (R55)Cooper S 1.6
2.0 T
2.0 i 16V GT
VS
CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 TvsRenaultLaguna II Grandtour2.0 i 16V GT
RS 2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
SkodaOctavia II CombiFacelift 2009RS 2.0 TSIvsVolkswagenPassat Alltrack (B7)2.0 TSI
2.0 T
2.5 i V6 24V Sport
VS
CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 TvsJaguarX-Type Estate2.5 i V6 24V Sport
2.0 T
1.6 RC
VS
CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 TvsPeugeot207 SW1.6 RC
Skoda Octavia II Combi · Facelift 2009 RS 2.0 TSI vs Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.0 T - car comparison - FastVsFaster