Car comparison

Cadillac BLS 2.8 T V6vsCadillac BLS Wagon 2.0 T

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Cadillac BLS

2.8 T V6

255 hp2792 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedSedan2006-2010
VS

Cadillac BLS Wagon

2.0 T

200 hp1998 ccGasolineFWDManualTurbochargedWagon / estate2007-2009

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Cadillac BLS 2.8 T V6

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.5 s
  • Fastest top speed
    245 km/h
    152 mph
  • Most powerful
    255 hp
    190 kW
  • Highest torque
    365 Nm
    269 lb-ft
  • Best power-to-weight
    161 hp/t
    120 kW/t
    6.2 kg/hp
  • Largest trunk
    425 L
  • Best overall score
    61/100
  • Best performance score
    56/100

Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.0 T

  • Lightest
    1,510 kg
    3,329 lb
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    8.3 L/100 km
    28.3 mpg US
    34.0 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    11.5 L/100 km
    20.5 mpg US
    24.6 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    6.4 L/100 km
    36.8 mpg US
    44.1 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    699 km
    434 mi
  • Best economy score
    85/100
  • Best practicality score
    81/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelCadillacBLS2.8 T V6CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T
Power
255hp190kW
200hp149kW
Torque
365Nm269lb-ft
300Nm221lb-ft
Curb weight
1,585kg3,494lb
1,510kg3,329lb
Gross weight
2,100kg4,630lb
2,070kg4,564lb
Top speed
245 km/h
152 mph
225 km/h
140 mph
To 99% top speed
70.0s99% target: 243 km/h / 151 mph
Calculated
77.5s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.5s
8.2s
0-200 km/h
25.1s
Calculated
34.6s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.2s
Calculated
7.8s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
10.8L/100 km21.8mpg US26.2mpg UK
8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
16.9L/100 km13.9mpg US16.7mpg UK
11.5L/100 km20.5mpg US24.6mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK
6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.3s
Calculated
15.9s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
161hp/t120kW/t73hp/1000 lb
Calculated
132hp/t99kW/t60hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
230Nm/t154lb-ft/ton
Calculated
199Nm/t133lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
537km334mi
Calculated
699km434mi
Calculated
Displacement
2,792cc170cu in
1,998cc122cu in
Length
4,680mm184in
4,716mm186in
Width
1,752mm69in
1,802mm71in
Height
1,471mm58in
1,543mm61in
Wheelbase
2,675mm105in
2,675mm105in
Front track
1,524mm60in
1,524mm60in
Rear track
1,506mm59in
1,506mm59in
Ground clearance
127mm5in
127mm5in
Trunk volume
425L
419L
Max trunk volume-
1,273L
Doors
4
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
58L
58L
CO2 emissions
259g/km
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Cadillac BLS 2.8 T V6Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.0 TPowerTorque
  • Cadillac BLS 2.8 T V6: Power / Torque
  • Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.0 T: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
CadillacBLS2.8 T V65,500 rpm1,800-4,500 rpm5,750 rpm
CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T5,500 rpm2,500-4,000 rpm5,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricCadillacBLS2.8 T V6CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.2 s
7.8 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.5 s
8.2 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
25.1 s
34.6 s
Top speed
245 km/h
152 mph
225 km/h
140 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.8 s
2.8 s
330 ft
101 m
7.0 s
7.1 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.3 s
10.5 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.0 s
13.5 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.3 s
15.9 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
159 km/h
99 mph
149 km/h
92 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacBLS2.8 T V6
255 hp
190 kW
CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T
200 hp
149 kW

Cadillac BLS 2.8 T V6 has 55 hp more than Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.0 T.

The biggest power difference is between Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.0 T and Cadillac BLS 2.8 T V6: 55 hp (41 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacBLS2.8 T V6
365 Nm
269 lb-ft
CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T
300 Nm
221 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacBLS2.8 T V6
1,585 kg
3,494 lb
CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T
1,510 kg
3,329 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacBLS2.8 T V6
245 km/h
152 mph
CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T
225 km/h
140 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacBLS2.8 T V67.5 s
CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T8.2 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Cadillac BLS 2.8 T V6 and Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.0 T: 0.7 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacBLS2.8 T V6
10.8 L/100 km
21.8 mpg US
26.2 mpg UK
CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T
8.3 L/100 km
28.3 mpg US
34.0 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.0 T and Cadillac BLS 2.8 T V6: 2.5 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacBLS2.8 T V6
161 hp/t
120 kW/t
6.2 kg/hp
CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T
132 hp/t
99 kW/t
7.5 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacBLS2.8 T V6
537 km
334 mi
CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T
699 km
434 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
CadillacBLS2.8 T V6
255 hp
190 kW
7.5 s
245 km/h
152 mph
CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T
200 hp
149 kW
8.2 s
225 km/h
140 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
CadillacBLS2.8 T V6
Power
255 hp
190 kW
0-100 km/h7.5 s
Top speed
245 km/h
152 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
425 L
15.0 cu ft
Length
4,680 mm
184.3 in
Height
1,471 mm
57.9 in
CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h8.2 s
Top speed
225 km/h
140 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
419 L
14.8 cu ft
Length
4,716 mm
185.7 in
Height
1,543 mm
60.7 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
CadillacBLS2.8 T V6
Power
255 hp
190 kW
0-100 km/h7.5 s
Top speed
245 km/h
152 mph
10.8 L/100 km
21.8 mpg US
26.2 mpg UK
CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h8.2 s
Top speed
225 km/h
140 mph
8.3 L/100 km
28.3 mpg US
34.0 mpg UK

Cadillac BLS 2.8 T V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
CadillacBLS2.8 T V6
10.8 L/100 km
21.8 mpg US
26.2 mpg UK
7.5 s
CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T
8.3 L/100 km
28.3 mpg US
34.0 mpg UK
8.2 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
CadillacBLS2.8 T V6
161 hp/t
120 kW/t
6.2 kg/hp
10.8 L/100 km
21.8 mpg US
26.2 mpg UK
CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T
132 hp/t
99 kW/t
7.6 kg/hp
8.3 L/100 km
28.3 mpg US
34.0 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleCadillacBLS2.8 T V6CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T
Power
255 hp
190 kW
200 hp
149 kW
Torque
365 Nm
269 lb-ft
300 Nm
221 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.5 s
8.2 s
Top speed
245 km/h
152 mph
225 km/h
140 mph
Lightness
1,585 kg
3,494 lb
1,510 kg
3,329 lb
Fuel consumption
10.8 L/100 km
21.8 mpg US
26.2 mpg UK
8.3 L/100 km
28.3 mpg US
34.0 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
425 L
15.0 cu ft
Length
4,680 mm
184.3 in
Height
1,471 mm
57.9 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
419 L
14.8 cu ft
Length
4,716 mm
185.7 in
Height
1,543 mm
60.7 in
Range score
537 km
334 mi
699 km
434 mi
CO2 score
259 g/km
-
Trunk score
425 L
15.0 cu ft
419 L
14.8 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
161 hp/t
120 kW/t
6.2 kg/hp
132 hp/t
99 kW/t
7.6 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleCadillac BLS 2.8 T V6Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.0 T
Consumption10.8 L/100 km21.8 mpg US26.2 mpg UK8.3 L/100 km28.3 mpg US34 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km18.90 LC100 km14.53 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi30.42 LC100 mi23.38 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,620 L428 US gal356 UK gal1,245 L329 US gal274 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,835 LC/year2,179 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Cadillac BLS 2.8 T V6

  • Has 55 hp more
  • Has 65 Nm more
  • Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 20 km/h (12 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 28 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 6 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest

Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.0 T

  • Is 75 kg lighter
  • Uses 2.5 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 162 km (101 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Cadillac BLS 2.8 T V6
Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.0 T
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.8 T V6
2.8 T V6
VS
CadillacBLS2.8 T V6vsCadillacBLS Wagon2.8 T V6
2.0 T
2.8 T V6
VS
CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 TvsCadillacBLS2.8 T V6
2.8 T V6
3.6 i V6
VS
CadillacBLS2.8 T V6vsCadillacSTS3.6 i V6
2.0 T
2.4 JTDM 20V
VS
CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 TvsAlfa Romeo159 Sportwagon2.4 JTDM 20V
2.8 T V6
3.2 V6 FSI
VS
CadillacBLS2.8 T V6vsVolkswagenPassat (B6)3.2 V6 FSI
2.0 T
2.4 D5
VS
CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 TvsVolvoV50Facelift 20072.4 D5
2.8 T V6
3.2 JTS V6
VS
CadillacBLS2.8 T V6vsAlfa Romeo1593.2 JTS V6
2.0 T
2.0 TSI
VS
CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 TvsSeatExeo ST2.0 TSI
2.8 T V6
3.3 V6
VS
CadillacBLS2.8 T V6vsHyundaiSonata V (NF)Facelift 20083.3 V6
2.0 T
2.0 i 16V GT
VS
CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 TvsRenaultLaguna II Grandtour2.0 i 16V GT
2.8 T V6
2.4i T5 20V
VS
CadillacBLS2.8 T V6vsVolvoS602.4i T5 20V
2.0 T
2.5 i V6 24V Sport
VS
CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 TvsJaguarX-Type Estate2.5 i V6 24V Sport
Cadillac BLS 2.8 T V6 vs Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.0 T - car comparison - FastVsFaster