Car comparison

Skoda Octavia II Combi · Facelift 2009 RS 2.0 TSIvsRenault Megane III Grandtour GT 2.0 TCe

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Skoda Octavia II Combi · Facelift 2009

RS 2.0 TSI

200 hp1984 ccGasolineFWDDual-clutchTurbochargedWagon / estate2009-2013

Renault Megane III Grandtour

GT 2.0 TCe

180 hp1998 ccGasolineFWDManualTurbochargedWagon / estate2010-2012

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Skoda Octavia II Combi Facelift 2009 RS 2.0 TSI

Quickest 0-100 km/h
7.3 s
Fastest top speed
237 km/h
147 mph
Most powerful
200 hp
149 kW
Best power-to-weight
135 hp/t
100 kW/t
7.4 kg/hp
Lowest combined fuel consumption
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK
Lowest city consumption
10.4 L/100 km
22.6 mpg US
27.2 mpg UK
Largest trunk
605 L
Best overall score
63/100
Best performance score
51/100
Best economy score
86/100
Best practicality score
87/100

Renault Megane III Grandtour GT 2.0 TCe

Highest torque
300 Nm
221 lb-ft
Lightest
1,391 kg
3,067 lb
Lowest highway consumption
5.9 L/100 km
39.9 mpg US
47.9 mpg UK
Best estimated range
779 km
484 mi

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
Model	SkodaOctavia II CombiFacelift 2009RS 2.0 TSI	RenaultMegane III GrandtourGT 2.0 TCe
Power	200hp149kW	180hp134kW
Torque	280Nm207lb-ft	300Nm221lb-ft
Curb weight	1,485kg3,274lb	1,391kg3,067lb
Gross weight	1,965kg4,332lb	1,884kg4,154lb
Top speed	237 km/h 147 mph	225 km/h 140 mph
To 99% top speed	71.6s99% target: 235 km/h / 146 mph Calculated	73.9s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph Calculated
0-100 km/h	7.3s	8.0s
0-200 km/h	27.0s Calculated	33.2s Calculated
0-60 mph	7.0s Calculated	7.6s Calculated
Fuel consumption	7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK	7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption city	10.4L/100 km22.6mpg US27.2mpg UK	10.9L/100 km21.6mpg US25.9mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway	6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK	5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK
Quarter mile	15.2s Calculated	15.8s Calculated
Power-to-weight	135hp/t100kW/t61hp/1000 lb Calculated	129hp/t96kW/t59hp/1000 lb Calculated
Torque-to-weight	189Nm/t126lb-ft/ton Calculated	216Nm/t144lb-ft/ton Calculated
Estimated range	714km444mi Calculated	779km484mi Calculated
Displacement	1,984cc121cu in	1,998cc122cu in
Length	4,599mm181in	4,559mm179in
Width	1,769mm70in	1,766mm70in
Height	1,451mm57in	1,461mm58in
Wheelbase	2,578mm101in	2,703mm106in
Front track	1,528mm60in	1,546mm61in
Rear track	1,508mm59in	1,547mm61in
Ground clearance	128mm5in	120mm5in
Trunk volume	605L	524L
Max trunk volume	1,655L	1,595L
Doors	5	5
Seats	5	5
Fuel tank	55L	60L
CO2 emissions	-	178g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Skoda Octavia II Combi Facelift 2009 RS 2.0 TSIRenault Megane III Grandtour GT 2.0 TCePowerTorque

Dyno simulation data table
Vehicle	Peak power RPM	Peak torque RPM	Max engine speed
SkodaOctavia II CombiFacelift 2009RS 2.0 TSI	5,100-6,000 rpm	1,700-5,000 rpm	6,250 rpm
RenaultMegane III GrandtourGT 2.0 TCe	5,500 rpm	2,250 rpm	5,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
Metric	SkodaOctavia II CombiFacelift 2009RS 2.0 TSI	RenaultMegane III GrandtourGT 2.0 TCe
	Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h	7.0 s	7.6 s
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph	7.3 s	8.0 s
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph	27.0 s	33.2 s
Top speed	237 km/h 147 mph	225 km/h 140 mph
	Drag race simulation
60 ft 18 m	2.7 s	2.8 s
330 ft 101 m	6.8 s	7.0 s
1/8 mile 201 m	10.1 s	10.4 s
1000 ft 305 m	12.9 s	13.4 s
1/4 mile 402 m	15.2 s	15.8 s
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m	157 km/h 98 mph	150 km/h 93 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
SkodaOctavia II CombiFacelift 2009RS 2.0 TSI	200 hp 149 kW
RenaultMegane III GrandtourGT 2.0 TCe	180 hp 134 kW

Skoda Octavia II Combi Facelift 2009 RS 2.0 TSI has 20 hp more than Renault Megane III Grandtour GT 2.0 TCe.

The biggest power difference is between Renault Megane III Grandtour GT 2.0 TCe and Skoda Octavia II Combi Facelift 2009 RS 2.0 TSI: 20 hp (15 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
SkodaOctavia II CombiFacelift 2009RS 2.0 TSI	280 Nm 207 lb-ft
RenaultMegane III GrandtourGT 2.0 TCe	300 Nm 221 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
SkodaOctavia II CombiFacelift 2009RS 2.0 TSI	1,485 kg 3,274 lb
RenaultMegane III GrandtourGT 2.0 TCe	1,391 kg 3,067 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
SkodaOctavia II CombiFacelift 2009RS 2.0 TSI	237 km/h 147 mph
RenaultMegane III GrandtourGT 2.0 TCe	225 km/h 140 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
SkodaOctavia II CombiFacelift 2009RS 2.0 TSI	7.3 s
RenaultMegane III GrandtourGT 2.0 TCe	8.0 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Skoda Octavia II Combi Facelift 2009 RS 2.0 TSI and Renault Megane III Grandtour GT 2.0 TCe: 0.7 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
SkodaOctavia II CombiFacelift 2009RS 2.0 TSI	7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK
RenaultMegane III GrandtourGT 2.0 TCe	7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
SkodaOctavia II CombiFacelift 2009RS 2.0 TSI	135 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp
RenaultMegane III GrandtourGT 2.0 TCe	129 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
SkodaOctavia II CombiFacelift 2009RS 2.0 TSI	714 km 444 mi
RenaultMegane III GrandtourGT 2.0 TCe	779 km 484 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
Vehicle	Power	Acceleration	Top speed
SkodaOctavia II CombiFacelift 2009RS 2.0 TSI	200 hp 149 kW	7.3 s	237 km/h 147 mph
RenaultMegane III GrandtourGT 2.0 TCe	180 hp 134 kW	8.0 s	225 km/h 140 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Vehicle

Performance score

Practicality score

SkodaOctavia II CombiFacelift 2009RS 2.0 TSI

Power	200 hp 149 kW
0-100 km/h	7.3 s
Top speed 237 km/h 147 mph

Doors/seats	5 doors 5 seats
Trunk	605 L 21.4 cu ft
Length	4,599 mm 181.1 in
Height	1,451 mm 57.1 in

RenaultMegane III GrandtourGT 2.0 TCe

Power	180 hp 134 kW
0-100 km/h	8.0 s
Top speed 225 km/h 140 mph

Doors/seats	5 doors 5 seats
Trunk	524 L 18.5 cu ft
Length	4,559 mm 179.5 in
Height	1,461 mm 57.5 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Vehicle

Performance score

Fuel economy score

SkodaOctavia II CombiFacelift 2009RS 2.0 TSI

Power	200 hp 149 kW
0-100 km/h	7.3 s
Top speed 237 km/h 147 mph

7.7 L/100 km

30.5 mpg US

36.7 mpg UK

RenaultMegane III GrandtourGT 2.0 TCe

Power	180 hp 134 kW
0-100 km/h	8.0 s
Top speed 225 km/h 140 mph

7.7 L/100 km

30.5 mpg US

36.7 mpg UK

Skoda Octavia II Combi Facelift 2009 RS 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
Vehicle	Fuel consumption, L/100 km	0-100 km/h, s
SkodaOctavia II CombiFacelift 2009RS 2.0 TSI	7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK	7.3 s
RenaultMegane III GrandtourGT 2.0 TCe	7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK	8.0 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
Vehicle	Power-to-weight, hp/t	Fuel consumption, L/100 km
SkodaOctavia II CombiFacelift 2009RS 2.0 TSI	135 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp	7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK
RenaultMegane III GrandtourGT 2.0 TCe	129 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp	7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Vehicle

SkodaOctavia II CombiFacelift 2009RS 2.0 TSI

RenaultMegane III GrandtourGT 2.0 TCe

Power

200 hp

149 kW

180 hp

134 kW

Torque

280 Nm

207 lb-ft

300 Nm

221 lb-ft

Acceleration

7.3 s

8.0 s

Top speed

237 km/h

147 mph

225 km/h

140 mph

Lightness

1,485 kg

3,274 lb

1,391 kg

3,067 lb

Fuel consumption

7.7 L/100 km

30.5 mpg US

36.7 mpg UK

7.7 L/100 km

30.5 mpg US

36.7 mpg UK

Practicality

Doors/seats	5 doors 5 seats
Trunk	605 L 21.4 cu ft
Length	4,599 mm 181.1 in
Height	1,451 mm 57.1 in

Doors/seats	5 doors 5 seats
Trunk	524 L 18.5 cu ft
Length	4,559 mm 179.5 in
Height	1,461 mm 57.5 in

Range score

714 km

444 mi

779 km

484 mi

CO2 score

178 g/km

Trunk score

605 L

21.4 cu ft

524 L

18.5 cu ft

Power-to-weight score

135 hp/t

100 kW/t

7.4 kg/hp

129 hp/t

96 kW/t

7.7 kg/hp

Overall

Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Average annual distanceDistance unitFuel price in your local currencyPrice unit

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
Vehicle	Skoda Octavia II Combi Facelift 2009 RS 2.0 TSI	Renault Megane III Grandtour GT 2.0 TCe
Consumption	7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK	7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km	13.48 LC100 km	13.48 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi	21.69 LC100 mi	21.69 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used	1,155 L305 US gal254 UK gal	1,155 L305 US gal254 UK gal
Annual fuel cost	2,021 LC/year	2,021 LC/year