Car comparison

Skoda Octavia II Combi · Facelift 2009 RS 2.0 TSIvsSeat Exeo ST · Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Skoda Octavia II Combi · Facelift 2009

RS 2.0 TSI

200 hp1984 ccGasolineFWDDual-clutchTurbochargedWagon / estate2009-2013
VS

Seat Exeo ST · Facelift 2011

2.0 TSI

200 hp1984 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedWagon / estate2011-2012

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Skoda Octavia II Combi Facelift 2009 RS 2.0 TSI

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.3 s
  • Fastest top speed
    237 km/h
    147 mph
  • Most powerful
    200 hp
    149 kW
  • Highest torque
    280 Nm
    207 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,485 kg
    3,274 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    135 hp/t
    100 kW/t
    7.4 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    7.7 L/100 km
    30.5 mpg US
    36.7 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    10.4 L/100 km
    22.6 mpg US
    27.2 mpg UK
  • Largest trunk
    605 L
  • Best overall score
    63/100
  • Best performance score
    51/100
  • Best economy score
    86/100
  • Best practicality score
    87/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelSkodaOctavia II CombiFacelift 2009RS 2.0 TSISeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI
Power
200hp149kW
200hp149kW
Torque
280Nm207lb-ft
280Nm207lb-ft
Curb weight
1,485kg3,274lb
1,515kg3,340lb
Gross weight
1,965kg4,332lb
2,075kg4,575lb
Top speed
237 km/h
147 mph
230 km/h
143 mph
To 99% top speed
71.6s99% target: 235 km/h / 146 mph
Calculated
71.7s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.3s
7.6s
0-200 km/h
27.0s
Calculated
29.9s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.0s
Calculated
7.2s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK
7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
10.4L/100 km22.6mpg US27.2mpg UK
10.6L/100 km22.2mpg US26.6mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK
6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.2s
Calculated
15.5s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
135hp/t100kW/t61hp/1000 lb
Calculated
132hp/t98kW/t60hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
189Nm/t126lb-ft/ton
Calculated
185Nm/t124lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
714km444mi
Calculated
909km565mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,984cc121cu in
1,984cc121cu in
Length
4,599mm181in
4,666mm184in
Width
1,769mm70in
1,772mm70in
Height
1,451mm57in
1,454mm57in
Wheelbase
2,578mm101in
2,642mm104in
Front track
1,528mm60in
1,522mm60in
Rear track
1,508mm59in
1,523mm60in
Ground clearance
128mm5in
-
Trunk volume
605L
422L
Max trunk volume
1,655L
1,354L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
55L
70L
CO2 emissions-
179g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Skoda Octavia II Combi Facelift 2009 RS 2.0 TSISeat Exeo ST Facelift 2011 2.0 TSIPowerTorque
  • Skoda Octavia II Combi Facelift 2009 RS 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
  • Seat Exeo ST Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
SkodaOctavia II CombiFacelift 2009RS 2.0 TSI5,100-6,000 rpm1,700-5,000 rpm6,250 rpm
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI5,100 rpm1,800 rpm5,350 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricSkodaOctavia II CombiFacelift 2009RS 2.0 TSISeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.0 s
7.2 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.3 s
7.6 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
27.0 s
29.9 s
Top speed
237 km/h
147 mph
230 km/h
143 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.7 s
2.7 s
330 ft
101 m
6.8 s
6.9 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.1 s
10.2 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.9 s
13.1 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.2 s
15.5 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
157 km/h
98 mph
154 km/h
96 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaOctavia II CombiFacelift 2009RS 2.0 TSI
200 hp
149 kW
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI
200 hp
149 kW

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaOctavia II CombiFacelift 2009RS 2.0 TSI
280 Nm
207 lb-ft
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI
280 Nm
207 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaOctavia II CombiFacelift 2009RS 2.0 TSI
1,485 kg
3,274 lb
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI
1,515 kg
3,340 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaOctavia II CombiFacelift 2009RS 2.0 TSI
237 km/h
147 mph
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI
230 km/h
143 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaOctavia II CombiFacelift 2009RS 2.0 TSI7.3 s
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI7.6 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Skoda Octavia II Combi Facelift 2009 RS 2.0 TSI and Seat Exeo ST Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI: 0.3 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaOctavia II CombiFacelift 2009RS 2.0 TSI
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaOctavia II CombiFacelift 2009RS 2.0 TSI
135 hp/t
100 kW/t
7.4 kg/hp
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI
132 hp/t
98 kW/t
7.6 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaOctavia II CombiFacelift 2009RS 2.0 TSI
714 km
444 mi
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI
909 km
565 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
SkodaOctavia II CombiFacelift 2009RS 2.0 TSI
200 hp
149 kW
7.3 s
237 km/h
147 mph
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI
200 hp
149 kW
7.6 s
230 km/h
143 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
SkodaOctavia II CombiFacelift 2009RS 2.0 TSI
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h7.3 s
Top speed
237 km/h
147 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
605 L
21.4 cu ft
Length
4,599 mm
181.1 in
Height
1,451 mm
57.1 in
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h7.6 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
422 L
14.9 cu ft
Length
4,666 mm
183.7 in
Height
1,454 mm
57.2 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
SkodaOctavia II CombiFacelift 2009RS 2.0 TSI
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h7.3 s
Top speed
237 km/h
147 mph
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h7.6 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK

Skoda Octavia II Combi Facelift 2009 RS 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
SkodaOctavia II CombiFacelift 2009RS 2.0 TSI
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK
7.3 s
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK
7.6 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
SkodaOctavia II CombiFacelift 2009RS 2.0 TSI
135 hp/t
100 kW/t
7.4 kg/hp
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI
132 hp/t
98 kW/t
7.6 kg/hp
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleSkodaOctavia II CombiFacelift 2009RS 2.0 TSISeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI
Power
200 hp
149 kW
200 hp
149 kW
Torque
280 Nm
207 lb-ft
280 Nm
207 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.3 s
7.6 s
Top speed
237 km/h
147 mph
230 km/h
143 mph
Lightness
1,485 kg
3,274 lb
1,515 kg
3,340 lb
Fuel consumption
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
605 L
21.4 cu ft
Length
4,599 mm
181.1 in
Height
1,451 mm
57.1 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
422 L
14.9 cu ft
Length
4,666 mm
183.7 in
Height
1,454 mm
57.2 in
Range score
714 km
444 mi
909 km
565 mi
CO2 score
-
179 g/km
Trunk score
605 L
21.4 cu ft
422 L
14.9 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
135 hp/t
100 kW/t
7.4 kg/hp
132 hp/t
98 kW/t
7.6 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleSkoda Octavia II Combi Facelift 2009 RS 2.0 TSISeat Exeo ST Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI
Consumption7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km13.48 LC100 km13.48 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi21.69 LC100 mi21.69 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,155 L305 US gal254 UK gal1,155 L305 US gal254 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,021 LC/year2,021 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Skoda Octavia II Combi Facelift 2009 RS 2.0 TSI

  • Is 30 kg lighter
  • Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 7 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 3 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 183 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Skoda Octavia II Combi RS 2.0 TSI
Seat Exeo ST 2.0 TSI
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

RS 2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
SkodaOctavia II CombiFacelift 2009RS 2.0 TSIvsSeatExeo ST2.0 TSI
RS 2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
SkodaOctavia II CombiFacelift 2009RS 2.0 TSIvsSeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSIvsSeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI
RS 2.0 TSI
2.4 i-VTEC
VS
SkodaOctavia II CombiFacelift 2009RS 2.0 TSIvsHondaAccord VIIIFacelift 20112.4 i-VTEC
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSIvsSeatExeo2.0 TSI
RS 2.0 TSI
GT 2.0 TCe
VS
SkodaOctavia II CombiFacelift 2009RS 2.0 TSIvsRenaultMegane III GrandtourGT 2.0 TCe
2.0 TSI
2.0 TDI
VS
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSIvsSeatLeon III ST2.0 TDI
RS 2.0 TSI
Cooper S 1.6
VS
SkodaOctavia II CombiFacelift 2009RS 2.0 TSIvsMiniClubman (R55)Cooper S 1.6
2.0 TSI
1.8 TSI
VS
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSIvsSeatLeon X-Perience1.8 TSI
RS 2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
SkodaOctavia II CombiFacelift 2009RS 2.0 TSIvsVolkswagenPassat Alltrack (B7)2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
2.0 TDI
VS
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSIvsSeatLeon III STFacelift 20162.0 TDI
RS 2.0 TSI
2.0 T
VS
SkodaOctavia II CombiFacelift 2009RS 2.0 TSIvsCadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T
Skoda Octavia II Combi · Facelift 2009 RS 2.0 TSI vs Seat Exeo ST · Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI - car comparison - FastVsFaster